DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cyclic performance of repaired welded unreinforced flange-bolted web connections

  • Yu-Lin Chung (Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University) ;
  • Geng-Jhou He (Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.09
  • 심사 : 2024.09.18
  • 발행 : 2024.12.25

초록

Three post-earthquake repair techniques were developed to restore or upgrade the capacity of fractured pre-Northridge beam-column connections. Four full-scale beam-to-box column connections were prepared and cyclically loaded until fracture. Three of them fractured at the bottom flange under the drift of about 2 to 3%, and one fractured at the top flange. The bottom flange fractured connections were then repaired and tested again. The results showed that the combination of applying supplemental welds at the web and attaching wing plates to the bottom flange increased the strength and ductility. The repaired connection fractured at the top flange at the drift amplitude of 4%. When inner flange stiffeners were additionally applied on the top flange for enhancement, the stress concentration was moved to the beam from the connection and resulted in a most ductile behavior among the repair techniques. The weld-free repair technique, which attaching the reduced section plate at the bottom flange by high tension bolts, exhibited a comparable performance to the connection repaired by adding additional welds and wing plates. Overall, the combination of attaching wing plates and inner stiffeners at the bottom and top flanges, respectively, would provide reliable performance.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank the technicians of NCREE South Laboratory for their technical support.

참고문헌

  1. ANSI/AISC 341-16 (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Atashzaban, A., Hajirasouliha, I., Jazany, R.A. and Izadinia, M. (2015), "Optimum drilled flange moment resisting connections for seismic regions", J. Constr. Steel Res., 112, 325-338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.013.
  3. Bertero, V.V., Anderson, J.C. and Krawinkler, H. (1994), "Performance of steel building structures during the Northridge earthquake", Report No. UCB/EERC-94/09; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  4. Carter, C.J. and Iwankiw, N.R. (1998), "Improved ductility in seismic steel moment frames with dogbone connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 46(1-3), 448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(98)80078-3
  5. Chen, S.J., Tsao, Y.C. and Chao, Y.C. (2001), "Enhancement of ductility of existing seismic steel moment connections", J. Struct. Eng., 127(5), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(538).
  6. Chi, B., Uang, C.M. and Chen, A. (2006), "Seismic rehabilitation of pre-Northridge steel moment connections: A case study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 62(8), 783-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.001.
  7. Chou, C.C. and Jao, C.K. (2010), "Seismic rehabilitation of welded steel beam-to-box column connections utilizing internal flange stiffeners", Earthq. Spectra, 26(4), 927-950. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3480275.
  8. Chou, C.C., Tsai, K.C., Wang, Y.Y. and Jao, C.K. (2010), "Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.931.
  9. Chung, Y.L., Du, L.J. and Pan, H.H. (2019), "Performance evaluation of a rocking steel column base equipped with asymmetrical resistance friction damper", Earthq. Struct., 17(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.1.049.
  10. Chung, Y.L., Nagae, T., Hitaka, T. and Nakashima, M. (2010), "Seismic resistance capacity of high-rise buildings subjected to long-period ground motions: E-Defense shaking table test", J. Struct. Eng., 136(6), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000161.
  11. Chung, Y.L., Nagae, T., Matsumiya, T. and Nakashima, M. (2011), "Seismic resistance capacity of beam-column connections in high‐rise buildings: E‐Defense shaking table test", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(6), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1037.
  12. Chung, Y.L., Nagae, T., Matsumiya, T. and Nakashima, M. (2012), "Seismic capacity of retrofitted beam-column connections in high-rise steel frames when subjected to long-period ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(4-10), 735-753, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1154.
  13. Engelhardt, M.D. and Husain, A.S. (1993), "Cyclic loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections", J. Struct. Eng., 9(12), 3537-3550. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3537).
  14. FEMA352 (2000), Recommended Postearthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded repair, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  15. FEMA355D (2000), State of the Art Report on Connection Performance, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, D.C., USA.
  16. Güneyisi, E.M. and Azez, I. (2016), "Seismic upgrading of structures with different retrofitting methods", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.589.
  17. Kim, S.Y. and Lee, C.H. (2017), "Seismic retrofit of welded steel moment connections with highly composite floor slabs", J. Constr. Steel Res., 139, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.010.
  18. Lee, C.H., Jung, J.H., Oh, M.H. and Koo, E.S. (2003), "Cyclic seismic testing of steel moment connections reinforced with welded straight haunch", Eng. Struct., 25, 1743-1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00176-7.
  19. Mahin, S.A. (1998), "Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00032-1.
  20. Nakashima, M., Roeder, C.W. and Maruoka, Y. (2000), "Steel moment frames for earthquakes in United Stated and Japan", J. Struct. Eng., 1268, 861-868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(861).
  21. Ricles, J.M., Fisher, J.W., Lu, L.W. and Kaufmann, E.J. (2002), "Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design", J. Constr. Steel Res., 58, 565-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00095-5.
  22. Tabar, A.M., Alonso-Rodriguez, A. and Tsavdaridis, K.D. (2022), "Building retrofit with reduced web (RWS) and beam (RBS) section limited-ductility connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 197, 107459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107459.
  23. Uang, C.M., Bondad, D. and Lee, C.H. (1998), "Cyclic performance of haunch repaired steel moment connections: Experimental testing and analytical modeling", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 552-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00093-X.
  24. Yu, K., Uang, C.M. and Gross, J. (2000), "Seismic rehabilitation design of steel moment connection with welded haunch", J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(69).
  25. Zirakian, T. and Zhang, J. (2016), "Study on seismic retrofit of structures using SPSW systems and LYP steel material", Earthq. Struct., 10(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.1.001.