Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soil Sampling Procedure for Management and Analysis of Legacy Sites in the Korean Peninsula

  • Yongmin Kim (Department of Radiological Science, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Suhui Park (Department of Radiological Science, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Jiyoung Han (Department of Radiological Science, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Jewan Park (Department of Radiological Science, Daegu Catholic University)
  • Received : 2024.01.19
  • Accepted : 2024.09.10
  • Published : 2024.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The Korean Peninsula is split between the South Korea and Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK, North Korea), with North Korea possessing nuclear weapons. There are rising concerns over legacy sites, areas contaminated primarily by nuclear activities. In North Korea, these sites lack regulatory oversight and are likely neglected even if inactive. Hence, it is vital to devise strategies to manage and assess these sites. Yongbyon, a prominent nuclear site in North Korea, has been proposed for environmental sampling to gauge contamination levels. The goal is to determine contamination by suggesting sample collection points in Yongbyon. Materials and Methods: Using recent data and satellite imagery from the International Atomic Energy Agency's periodic Safety Measures Report, we selected legacy sites to assess their contamination levels with recent data and satellite imagery. We identified sampling locations using the Visual Sample Plan (VSP) to check nuclear contamination. From these results, we devised a scenario evaluating accessibility and the local environment. Results and Discussion: For Yongbyon in North Korea, this study created two sampling scenarios based on interior access feasibility. Given North Korea's constraints, we finalized the scenario without interior access. The sampling areas include two steam lines, four vehicle paths, and five green zones outside the facility. Conclusion: Nuclear facility operations worldwide are concerning. When halted, these become legacy sites requiring contamination management. Despite North Korea's limited recordkeeping and challenges in determining contamination, we devised a sampling scenario using VSP software, factoring in accessibility and movement paths.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) of South Korea (Grant No. 202000810004).

References

  1. Park I, Kim IH, Nam SY, Nam Goong T. Kim HA, Koo HY, et al. 2021 Disarmament non-proliferation [Internet]. Office of Disarmament and Nonproliferation Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; 2021 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://mexmofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_3988/riww.2o?seq=362189&page=1 (Korean).
  2. Nuclear Energy Agency. Challenges in nuclear and radiological legacy site management: towards a common regulatory framework [Internet]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2020 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/CCb40709-en
  3. Chang S. A study on nuclear legacy site management according to international management guidance. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022;16(2):185-194.
  4. Oh IS, Cho EJ. A proposed scheme for assessing and managing uranium in North Korea for peaceful purposes [Internet]. Institute for National Security Strategy; 2019 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://www.inss.re.kr/upload/bbs/BBSA05/202010/F10531.pdf (Korean).
  5. Pabian F, Heinonen O, Liu J, Makowsky P. North Korea's Yongbyon Nuclear Center: reprocessing status remains unclear [Internet]. 38 North; 2021 [cited 2024 Sep14. Available from: https://www.38north.org/2021/04/north-koreas-yongbyon-nuclear-center-reprocessing-status-remains-unclear
  6. Hansen N. Major development: reactor fuel fabrication facilities identified at Yongbyon Nuclear Complex [Internet]. 38 North; 2013 [cited 2024 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.38north.org/2013/12/yongbyon122313
  7. Hong WT. Study on North Korea's nuclear and missile countermeasures [Internet]. Korea Institute for National Unification; 2013 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://repo.kinu.or.kr/bitstream/2015.0ak/2268/1/0001462001.pdf (Korean).
  8. Matzke BD, Wilson JE, Newburn LL, Dowson ST, Hathaway JE, Sego LH, et al. Visual Sample Plan version 7.0 user's guide [Internet]. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2014 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://vsp.pnnl.gov/docs/PNNL-23211.pdf
  9. Pulsipher B, Hathaway J, Anderson K, Wilson J. Demonstration report for Visual Sample Plan (VSP) verification sampling meth-ods at the Navy/DRI site [Internet]. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2011 [cited 2024 Sep14]. Available from: https://apps.dtic.nil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA581965.pdf
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on systematic planning using the data quality objectives process (EPAQA/G-4) [Internet]. U.S. EPA; 2006 [cited 2024 Sep14|. Available from: https://v.ww.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/g4-final.pdf
  11. Sakaguchi A, Kadokura A, Steier P, Tanaka K, Takahashi Y, Chiga H, et al. Isotopic determination of U, Pu and Cs in environmen-tal waters following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Geochem J. 2012;46(4):355-360. https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.2.0216
  12. Barnekow U, Fesenko S, Kashparov V, Kis-Benedek G, Matisoff G, Onda Y, et al. Guidelines on soil and vegetation sampling for radiological monitoring (IAEA Technica Jyeports no. 486) [Internet]. International Atomic Energy Agency; 2019 [cited2024Sep14]. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/DOC_010_486_web.pdf
  13. International Atomic Energy Agency. Application of safeguards in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (GOV 2022/40-GC(66)16) [Internet]. IAEA; 2022 [cited 2024 Sep14. Available from: https://vww.iaea.org/sites/default/files/gc/gc66-16.pdf