Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cases of Judicial Decisions Related to the Human Health Effects of Low-Dose Radiation in Korea

  • Eunok Han (Department of Education & Research, Korea Association of Nuclear.Radiation Safety)
  • Received : 2024.10.29
  • Accepted : 2024.12.08
  • Published : 2024.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study is a comparative analysis of legal decisions by the Korean judiciary regarding human health effects of radiation exposure in lawsuits related to the linear no threshold hypothesis of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), particularly following the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in 2011. Materials and Methods: The legal cases related to radiation exposure and human health effects were searched and compiled using legal databases such as 'national law information center,' 'case note,' and 'LBOX.' Keywords such as 'radiation,' 'human health effects,' 'lawsuit,' 'radiation effects,' and 'disease' were used to search for relevant legal cases, leading to the identification of a total of nine legal decisions. The original texts of these cases were analyzed. The analysis categorized the cases based on the distinction between the plaintiff, radiation doses, types of diseases, and the results of the lawsuits. Results and Discussion: Four lawsuits ruled that there is a causal relationship between radiation exposure and human health effects. These rulings were made in 2016 (two cases), 2018, and 2022. In cases where the radiation exposure doses were precisely recorded as 1.71 mSv and 2.09 mSv, the rulings also concluded that there was a causal relationship between radiation exposure and human health effects. In contrast, five lawsuits concluded that there was no causal relationship between low-dose radiation exposure and human health effects, ruling that a radiation exposure of 12.25 mSv was not related to the disease. Conclusion: Judicial rulings on radiation risks must be consistent and equitable. The ICRP recommends standards for radiation protection and dose limits. Based on these recommendations, the executive branch must establish consistent guidelines, and judicial rulings must maintain consistency in accordance with these standards.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee BH. Constitutional theory in relation to the safety protection of citizens in the guaranteeing state. Const Law. 2016;22(1):217-246 (Korean).
  2. Hong WS. Legislation policy for the realization of the right to safety. Eur Const. 2013;14:225-250 (Korean).
  3. Constitutional Court 2004 Heonba 81 (Jul 31, 2008). Available from: https://casenote.kr/%E0%97%8C%EB%62%9596EC%9E%AC%ED%8C%90%EC%86%8C/2004%ED%97%8C%EB%B0%9481 (Korean).
  4. Constitutional Court 94 Heonma 136 (Jul 21, 1995). Available from: https://casenote.kr/%E1%97%8C%EB96B2%9596EC%9E%AC%ED%8C%90%EC%86%8C/94%ED%97%8C%EB%A7%88136 (Korean).
  5. Constitutional Court Decision 2004 Heonma 554 (Oct 21, 2004). Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%97%8C96EC%9E%AC%EA%B2%B0%EC%A0%95%EB%A1%80/(2004%ED%97%8C%EB%A7%88554) (Korean).
  6. Ono KJ, Kumasawa T Shimatani K, Kanou M, Yamaguchi l, Kumugita N. Radiation dose distribution of a surgeon and medical staff during orthopedic balloon kyphoplasty in Japan. J Radiat Prot Res. 2022;47(2):86-92. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2021.00304
  7. Kim HS, Jeong H, Moon H, Park SH. Analytic hierarchy process for prioritizing radiation safety measures in medical institutions. J Radiat Prot Res. 2024;49(1):40-49. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2023.00654
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radio-logical Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332.
  9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The precautionary principle [Internet]. UNESCO; 2005 [cited 2024 Dec10]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139578
  10. Valentin J. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. ICRP Publication 99. Ann ICRP. 2005;35(4):1-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2005.11.005
  11. Chang KW. Precautionary principle in EU environmental law. Adm Law J. 2011:31:171-194 (Korean).
  12. Cho TJ. Risk management organization in food law. Hanyang Law Rev. 2007;24(4):331-469 (Korean).
  13. Choi S. Opening judicial decisions and judicial accountability. Const Law. 2022;28(1):421-452 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.35901/kjcl.2022.28.1.421
  14. Ulsan District Court Decision 2013 Guhap 981: Cancellation of disapproval of medical care (May 14, 2015). Available from: https://casenote.k:1%EC%9A%B8%EC%82%B0%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%EC%9B%90/2013%EA%B5%AC%ED%95%A9981 (Korean).
  15. Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2014 Guhap 18220: Can-cellation of the decision to not pay survivors benefits and funer-al expenses (May 12, 2016). Available from: https://legalengine.co.kr/cases/J6IPCkLazbHgtmZLxFuMW (Korean).
  16. Busan District Court Decision 2015 Gudan 21388: Denying reg-istration of national meritorious person, etc. (Nov 21, 2018). Available from: https://casenote.k:/%EB%B6%80%EC%82%B0%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%EC%9B%90/2015%EA%B5%AC%EB%8B%A821388 (Korean).
  17. Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2021 Gudan 63436: Can-cellation of disapproval of nursing care benefits (Apr 29, 2022). Available from: https://casenote.kr/%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EB%B2%95%EC%9B%90/2021%EA%B5%AC%EB%8B%A863436 (Korean).
  18. Seoul High Court Decision 2015 Nu 64239: Cancellation of the order to not pay survivors benefits and funeral expenses (Feb 3, 2017) (Korean).
  19. Busan District Court Eastern Branch Decision 2012 Gahap100370: Damages (Oct 17, 2014). Available from: https://casenote.kr/%EB%B6%80%EC%82%B0%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%EC%9B%90_%EB%8F%99%EB%B69680%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90/2012%EA%B0%80%ED%95%A9100370 (Korean).
  20. Seoul High Court Decision 2019 Nu 64091: Cancellation of non-approval of official medical care (May 15, 2020) (Korean).
  21. Ulsan District Court Decision 2016 Guhap 5932: Cancellation of non-approval of medical care (Jun 28, 2018).
  22. Gwangju District Court Decision 2020 Gahap 58330: Occupation-al medical expenses (Jun 16, 2022).
  23. Kwon S. A study on the historical changes in the style of court judgments: focusing on supreme court precedent. J East Asian Cult. 2024:98:77-119 (Korean).
  24. Chang C. An analysis on competitions of constitutional inter-pretations for seeking compromise between conservatives and liberals in Korea. Korean J Law Soc. 2022;69:163-197 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.33446/KJLS.69.6
  25. Geyh CG. The endless judicial selection debate and why it mat-ters for judicial independence. Georget J Leg Ethics. 2008;21:1259-1281.
  26. Vanberg G. Establishing and maintaining judicial independence. In: Caldeira GA, Kelemen RD, Whittington KE, editors. The Oxford handbook of law and politics. Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 99-118.
  27. Mainwaring S. Introduction: democratic accountability in Latin America. In: Mainwaring S, Welna C. editors. Democratic account-ability in Latin America. Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 3-33.
  28. Mulgan R. Holding power to account: accountability in modern democracies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
  29. Schedler A. Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler A, Diamond L, Plattner MF, editors. The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1999. p. 11-28.
  30. Geyh CG. Rescuing judicial accountability from the realm of po-litical rhetoric. Case West Reserve Law Rev. 2006;56:911-935.
  31. Choi S. Increased judicial power and control over it. Const Law. 2015;21(jL):165-197 (Korean).
  32. Dworkin R. Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press; 1977.
  33. Lee JT, Kim H. Epidemiologic methods and study designs for in-vestigating adverse health effects of ambient air pollution. Kore-an) Prev Med. 2001;34(2):119-126 (Korean).
  34. Office for Government Policy Coordination (Regulatory Policy Coordination Division). Framework act on administrative regu-lations [Internet]. National Lega Information Center; 2024 [cited2024Dec10]. Available from: https://Iaw.go.kr/LSW/IsInfoP.do?lsId=001360&ancYnChk=0#0000
  35. Kim JK. Legal issues on the installation of nuclear power plants. J Legis Res. 2002;22:177-199 (Korean).
  36. Kim MS. Problems of administrative rules in Korea and ways to ensure legal system compatibility. Proceedings of the Academic Conference of Kookmin University Law Research Institute; 2015 Oct 22; Seoul, Korea. p.79-94 (Korean).
  37. Lee WW. Innovation and regulation: the legal structure of their relations and legal means to resolve their mutual conflicts. J Law Econ Regul. 2016;9(2):7-29 (Korean).
  38. Seo Y. System legitimacy in the legislation theory. Unification Humanit. 2016;65:273-300 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.21185/jhu.2016.03.65.273
  39. Ham CH. Nuclear safety legislation. Vol. 1. Jinwon Publishing; 2016 (Korean).
  40. Jo SH. Regulation, the tool of governance. Korean Policy Sci Rev 2006;10(4):1-18 (Korean).
  41. Ryu KH. Comparative analysis of legal systems on radiation safety regulations. Issue Brief Foreign Laws. 2007;17(13):I-47 (Korean).
  42. Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute 448 U.S. 607 (Jul 2, 1980). Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial Union_Departmentv_American_Petroleum_Institute
  43. Legal Information Institute. 5 U.S. Code S706 Scope of review [Internet]. LII; 2000 [cited 2024 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/706
  44. Fischer F. Citizens, experts and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press; 2000.
  45. Kim JC. National safety protection obligation to prevent risk, dan-ger caused by development of science-technology. HUFS Law Review. 2009;33(1):339-389 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.17257/hufslr.2009.33.1.339
  46. Choi YS, Jung SJ, Choi KS. Safety culture of regulatory body: its expectations and limitations as a complementary role for nucle-ar safety regulatory institutions. J Regul Stud. 2020;29(2):197-224 (Korean).
  47. Lee SY. A study on the reorganization of the nuclear law system. Korea Legislation Research Institute; 2011 (Korean).