DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problem-solving in multidisciplinary fashion design collaboration using virtual reality environments - A case study on Spatial.io -

가상현실 기술 기반 다학제적 패션디자인 협업의 문제 해결 과정 - Spatial.io 활용 사례 연구를 중심으로 -

  • 양은경 (연세대학교 통합디자인학과)
  • Received : 2024.11.12
  • Accepted : 2024.12.11
  • Published : 2024.12.31

Abstract

This study investigates the cognitive characteristics and transition flow of team mental models in virtual reality environments (VRE) compared to Zoom-based collaboration during fashion design problem-solving processes. Using the VRE platform Spatial.io as a case study, the study examines how virtual reality technologies influence the formation of shared mental models among collaborators. The objective is to identify key cognitive features that VREs offer to support problem-solving in multidisciplinary fashion design collaborations. The study employed a comparative experimental design, involving professionals from fashion design, marketing, and production. Participants completed the design concept generation tasks in both VRE and Zoom environments, all interactions were recorded and coded, with the analysis focusing on cognitive transitions, verbal dynamics, and collaborative behavior patterns across both environments. The results reveal that VRE fosters higher frequencies of environmental interaction (EI-EI), cognitive integration (CIM-CI), and planning to execution transitions in team interactions (PP-PIM), forming multidirectional feedback loops. These features enhanced dynamic adaptation to environmental stimuli. In contrast, Zoom-based collaboration relied heavily on linear verbal communication, with fewer cognitive transitions and limited structural feedback loops, thereby reducing efficiency in idea evaluation and execution in team interaction. The study highlights the potential of VREs to transform collaborative practices in fashion design by enabling immersive and multidimensional interactions, contributing to advancing digital collaboration strategies in creative industries, with implications for education and interdisciplinary innovation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020S1A5B5A16082911).

References

  1. Ahn, S., & Ryou, E. (2024). The impact of consumer smartness and the perceived intellectual capital of fashion firm on value co-creation behavior intention in virtual worlds. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 32(2), 148-163. doi:10.29049/rjcc.2024.32.2.148
  2. Akram, S. V., Malik, P. K., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Juyal, A., Ghafoor, K. Z., & Shrestha, S. (2022). Implementation of digitalized technologies for fashion industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges. Scienfitif Programming, 2022, 7523246. doi:10.1155/2022/7523246
  3. Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K., & Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3(1), 5-20. doi:10.1080/15710880601170768
  4. Casanueva, J. S., & Blake, E. (2001, September). The effects of avatars on co-presence in a collaborative virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologiest, Pretoria, South Africa.
  5. Chang, Y.-S., Kao, J.-Y., & Wang, Y.-Y. (2022). Influences of virtual reality on design creativity and design thinking. Thinking Sills and Creativity, 46, 101127. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101127
  6. Doroudian, S., & Wartell, Z. (2024). Collaboration in immersive environments: Challenges and solutions. arXiv, abs/2311.00689.
  7. Ericssion, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  8. Fröst, P., & Warren, P. (2000, July). Virtual reality used in a collaborative architectural design process. An International Conference of Computer Visualization and Graphics, London.
  9. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262-271. doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
  10. Kelion, L. (2020, December 2). NHS Covid-19 and Zoom top Apple's iPhone 2020 app charts. BBC. Retrieved November 27, 2024, from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55159944
  11. Kordova, S., & Hirschprung, R. S. (2023). Effectiveness of the forced usage of alternative digital platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic in project communication management. Heliyon, 9(11), e21812. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21812
  12. Kruger, C., & Cross, N. (2001). Modeling cognitive strategies in creative design. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Computational and cognitive models of creativie design V (pp. 1-25). Sydney: University of Sydney Press.
  13. Lee, J. H., Yang, E., & Sun, Z. Y. (2021). Using an immersive virtual reality design tool to support cognitive action and creativity: Educational insights from fashion designers. The Design Journal, 24(4), 503-524. doi:10.1080/14606925.2021.
  14. Licheva, Z. (2016). Interdisciplinary collaboration in the creative industries. Unpublished master's thesis. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Nederland.
  15. Lim, H. (2024). A study on the perception of the metaverse and luxury fashion brands. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 32(2), 125-147. doi:10.29049/rjcc.2024.32.2.125
  16. McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D. A., Zielinski, D. J., & Brady, R. B. (2012). Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game. IEEE Transactions on Visuzliation and Computer Graphics, 18(4), 626-633. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.43
  17. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321-1329.
  18. Paramasivam, I. (2023, March 10). Fashioning the future: Decentraland, Spatial.io and OVER come together for Metaverse Fashion Week 2023. VOGUE Singapore. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://vogue.sg/decentraland-spatialio-metaverse-fashion-week-2023/
  19. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15(3), 323-356. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb0 0188.x
  20. Schuemie, M. J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., & Van Der Mast, C. A. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 183-201. doi:10.1089/109493101300117884
  21. Seybold, C., & Mantwill, F. (2021). 3D sketches in virtual reality and their effect on development times. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 1-10. doi:10.1017/pds.2021.1
  22. Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2018). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2013-0-18583-2
  23. Sonnenburg, S. (2004). Creativity in communciation: A theoretical framework for collabrative product creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 254-262. doi:10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00314.x
  24. Sopher, H., & Dorta, T. (2022). Using social VR system in multidisciplinary codesign. Co-creating the Future: Inclusion in and through Design, 1, 547-556. doi:10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.1.547
  25. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams: An analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473-496. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2
  26. Vosinakis, S., Koutsabasis, P., Stavrakis, M., Viorres, N., & Darzentas, J. (2008). Virtual environments for collaborative design: Requirements and guidelines from a social action perspective. CoDesign, 4(3), 133-150. doi:10.1080/15710880802250112
  27. Yang, E. K., & Lee, J. H. (2020). Cognitive impact of virtual reality sketching on designers' concept generation. Digital Creativity, 31(2), 82-97. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2020.1726964
  28. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 108-110. doi:10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108