Journal of Korean Dental Science

Korean Academy of Dental Science (대한치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D Facial Scanners: How to Make the Right Choice for Orthodontists

  • Young-Soo Seo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Do-Gil Kim (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Gye-Hyeong Lee (21st Century Orthodontic Clinic) ;
  • Kyungmin Clara Lee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2023.09.27
  • Accepted : 2023.11.24
  • Published : 2024.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the advances of digital scanning technology in dentistry, the interests in facial scanning in orthodontics have increased. There are many different manufacturers of facial scanners marketing to the dental practice. How do you know which one will work best for you? What questions should you be asking? We suggest a clinical guideline which may help you make an informed decision when choosing facial scanners. The characteristics of 7 facial scanners were discussed in this article. Here are some considerations for choosing a facial scanner. *Accuracy: For facial scanners to be of real value, having an appropriate camera resolution is necessary to achieve more accurate facial image representation. For orthodontic application, the scanner must create an accurate representation of an entire face. *Ease of Use: Scanner-related issues that impact their ease of use include type of light; scan type; scan time; file type generated by the scanner; unit size and foot print; and acceptance of scans by third-party providers. *Cost: Most of the expenses associated with facial scanning involve the fixed cost of purchase and maintenance. Other expenses include technical support, warranty costs, transmission fees, and supply costs. This article suggests a clinical guideline to make the right choice for facial scanner in orthodontics.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2021-3860).

References

  1. Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J, Xia JJ. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3:97-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.141
  2. Tzou CH, Frey M. Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19:591-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2011.07.003
  3. Schendel SA, Duncan KS, Lane C. Image fusion in preoperative planning. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19:577-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2011.07.002
  4. Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I, Hold A, Placheta E, Kropatsch WG, Frey M. Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:489-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.003
  5. Cho RY, Byun SH, Yi SM, Ahn HJ, Nam YS, Park IY, On SW, Kim JC, Yang BE. Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10:545.
  6. Aljawad H, Lim HJ, Lee KC. Anthropometric comparison of 3-dimensional facial scan taken with a low-cost facial scanner with cone-beam computed tomography scan. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34:1456-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009076
  7. Aljawad H, Lee KC. Validity of three-dimensional facial scan taken with facial scanner and digital photo wrapping on the cone-beam computed tomography: Comparison of soft tissue parameters. J Korean Dent Sci. 2022;15:19-30.
  8. 3dMD. Available from URL: https://3dmd.com/prod-ucts (Accessed on March 12, 2024).
  9. Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:612-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.023
  10. Direct Dimensions. Available from URL: http://3dcadmodeling.com/port_ffproducts.php?fileName=ffp_ di3d (Accessed on March 12, 2024).
  11. Aljawad H, Kang N, Lee KC. Integration accuracy of craniofacial cone-beam computed tomography images with three-dimensional facial scans according to different registration areas. Angle Orthod. 2023;93:66-70. https://doi.org/10.2319/021422-135.1
  12. Park JH, Lee GH, Moon DN, Kim JC, Park M, Lee KM. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:849-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.002
  13. Pfeifer N, Briese C. Laser scanning - principles and applications. Available from URL: https://publik.tuwien. ac.at/files/pub-geo_1951.pdf (Accessed on March 12, 2024).
  14. Marshall GF, Stutz GE. Handbook of Optical and Laser Scanning. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012.
  15. Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:612-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.023
  16. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17:318-30.
  17. Klette R, Schluns K, Koschan A. Computer Vision: Three-Dimensional Data from Images. Singapore: Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte. Ltd.; 1998. p. 347-76.
  18. Bell T, Li B, Zhang S. Structured Light Techniques and Applications. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2016.
  19. Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med. 2010:6:18.
  20. Gangapurwala P. Methods of Stereophotogrammetry: A Review. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Science & Technology (ICAST2021). Available from URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3866518 (Accessed on March 12, 2024).
  21. Brown M, Burschka D, Hager GD. Advances in computational stereo. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2003;25:993-1008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1217603
  22. Siebert JP, Marshall SJ. Human body 3D imaging by speckle texture projection photogrammetry. Sensor Rev. 2000;20:218-26.