DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of PM2.5 Concentrations and Comparison of Affecting Factors in Residential Houses in Summer and Autumn

여름과 가을의 주택실내 초미세먼지(PM2.5) 농도 측정 및 영향요인 비교

  • Dongjun Kim (Department of Health and Safety, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Gihong Min (Department of Health and Safety, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Jihun Shin (Department of Health and Safety, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Youngtae Choe (Department of Health and Safety, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kilyoong Choi (Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Sang Hyo Sim (Department of Health Administration, Hanyang Women's University) ;
  • Wonho Yang (Department of Health and Safety, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 김동준 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건안전학과) ;
  • 민기홍 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건안전학과) ;
  • 신지훈 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건안전학과) ;
  • 최영태 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건안전학과) ;
  • 최길용 (안양대학교 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 심상효 (한양여자대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 양원호 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건안전학과)
  • Received : 2024.01.04
  • Accepted : 2024.01.25
  • Published : 2024.02.28

Abstract

Background: Indoor PM2.5 concentrations in residential houses can be affected by various factors depending on the season. This is because not only do the climate characteristics depend on the season, but the activity patterns of occupants are also different. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare factors affecting indoor PM2.5 concentrations in apartments and detached houses in Daegu according to seasonal changes. Methods: This study included 20 households in Daegu, South Korea. The study was conducted during the summer (from July 10 to August 10, 2023) and the autumn (from September 11 to October 9, 2023). A sensor-based instrument for PM2.5 levels was installed in the living room of each residence, and measurements were taken continuously for 24 hours at intervals of one minute during the measurement period. Based on the air quality monitoring system data in Daegu, outdoor PM2.5 concentrations were estimated using ordinary kriging (OK) in Python. In addition, the indoor activities of the occupants were investigated using a time-activity pattern diary. The affecting factors of indoor PM2.5 concentration were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. Results: Indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations of the residences during summer were 15.27±11.09 ㎍/m3 and 11.52±7.56 ㎍/m3, respectively. Indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations during autumn were 13.82±9.61 ㎍/m3 and 9.57±5.50 ㎍/m3, respectively. The PM2.5 concentrations were higher in summer compared to autumn both indoors and outdoors. The primary factor affecting indoor PM2.5 concentration in summer was occupant activity. On the other hand, during the autumn season, the primary affecting factor was outdoor PM2.5 concentration. Conclusions: Indoor PM2.5 concentration in residential houses is affected by occupant activity such as the inflow of outdoor PM2.5 concentration, cooking, and cleaning, as found in previous studies. However, it was revealed that there were differences depending on the season.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 환경성 질환 예방관리 핵심 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 수행되었으며(과제번호: 2021003320001), 환경부, 환경보건학회 환경보건센터 "2023년 환경보건 전문인력 양성사업 위탁사업(환경보건학회)"에서 지원받아 수행된 결과이며 이에 감사드립니다.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Household air pollution. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health?gclid=Cj0KCQiAmNeqBhD4ARIsADsYfTf2iN52jV1-AiqB7-VXNNTGFeW4ypYvTXtTobPygNe-EpdB4XMAxTEaAhfgEALw_wcB [Accessed 1 December 2023]. 
  2. Tan CCL, Finney KN, Chen Q, Russell NV, Sharifi VN, Swithenbank J. Experimental investigation of indoor air pollutants in residential buildings. Indoor Built Environ. 2013; 22(3): 471-489. 
  3. Elgethun K, Yost MG, Fitzpatrick CT, Nyerges TL, Fenske RA. Comparison of global positioning system (GPS) tracking and parent-report diaries to characterize children's time-location patterns. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007; 17(2): 196-206. 
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths. Lyon: IARC; 2013. 
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Health and environmental effects of particulate matter (PM). Available: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm [Accessed 1 December 2023]. 
  6. Jung EM, Kim KN, Park H, Shin HH, Kim HS, Cho SJ, et al. Association between prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and the increased risk of specified infant mortality in South Korea. Environ Int. 2020; 144: 105997. 
  7. Burke JM, Zufall MJ, Ozkaynak H. A population exposure model for particulate matter: case study results for PM2.5 in Philadelphia, PA. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001; 11(6): 470-489. 
  8. Riley WJ, McKone TE, Lai AC, Nazaroff WW. Indoor particulate matter of outdoor origin: importance of size-dependent removal mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(2): 200-207. Erratum in: Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(8): 1868. 
  9. Abt E, Suh HH, Allen G, Koutrakis P. Characterization of indoor particle sources: a study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(1): 35-44. 
  10. AirKorea. Available: https://www.airkorea.or.kr/web/?isPC=Y [Accessed 1 December 2023]. 
  11. Kim SY, Yi SJ, Eum YS, Choi HJ, Shin H, Ryou HG, et al. Ordinary kriging approach to predicting long-term particulate matter concentrations in seven major Korean cities. Environ Health Toxicol. 2014; 29: e2014012. 
  12. Solihah KI, Martono DN, Haryanto B. Identifying the best spatial interpolation method for estimating spatial distribution of PM2.5 in Jakarta. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 893: 012043. 
  13. Lee M. An analysis on the concentration characteristics of PM2.5 in Seoul, Korea from 2005 to 2012. Asia Pac J Atmos Sci. 2014; 50(Suppl 1): 585-594. 
  14. Leung DYC. Outdoor-indoor air pollution in urban environment: challenges and opportunity. Front Environ Sci. 2015; 2: 69. 
  15. Weschler CJ, Shields HC. The influence of ventilation on reactions among indoor pollutants: modeling and experimental observations. Indoor Air. 2000; 10(2): 92-100. 
  16. Lee S, Lee K. Seasonal differences in determinants of time location patterns in an urban population: a large population-based study in Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(7): 672. 
  17. Choi JK, Heo JB, Ban SJ, Yi SM, Zoh KD. Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 aerosol in Incheon, Korea. Atmos Environ. 2012; 60: 583-592. 
  18. Kim HS, Huh JB, Hopke PK, Holsen TM, Yi SM. Characteristics of the major chemical constituents of PM2.5 and smog events in Seoul, Korea in 2003 and 2004. Atmos Environ. 2007; 41(32): 6762-6770. 
  19. Korea Meteorological Administration. Available: https://www.weather.go.kr/w/index.do [Accessed 1 December 2023]. 
  20. Kweather. Available: https://www.kweather.co.kr/sub/vent/view.php?pnum=111 [Accessed 1 December 2023]. 
  21. Guak S. Estimation of population exposure to particulate matter in Seoul [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Seoul National University; 2021. 
  22. Lin YC, Chi WJ, Lin YQ. The improvement of spatial-temporal resolution of PM2.5 estimation based on micro-air quality sensors by using data fusion technique. Environ Int. 2020; 134: 105305. 
  23. Fitri DW, Afifah N, Anggarani SMD, Chamidah N. Prediction concentration of PM2.5 in Surabaya using ordinary kriging method. AIP Conf Proc. 2021; 2329: 060030. 
  24. Ahmed SO, Mazloum R, Abou-Ali H. Spatiotemporal interpolation of air pollutants in the Greater Cairo and the Delta, Egypt. Environ Res. 2018; 160: 27-34. 
  25. Alimissis A, Philippopoulos K, Tzanis CG, Deligiorgi D. Spatial estimation of urban air pollution with the use of artificial neural network models. Atmos Environ. 2018; 191: 205-213. 
  26. Jung CC, Lin WY, Hsu NY, Wu CD, Chang HT, Su HJ. Development of hourly indoor PM2.5 concentration prediction model: the role of outdoor air, ventilation, building characteristic, and human activity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16): 5906. 
  27. Yang Q, Yuan Q, Li T, Shen H, Zhang L. The Relationships between PM2.5 and meteorological factors in China: seasonal and regional variations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(12): 1510. 
  28. Liu Z, Shen L, Yan C, Du J, Li Y, Zhao H. Analysis of the influence of precipitation and wind on PM2.5 and PM10 in the atmosphere. Adv Meteorol. 2020; 2020; 5039613. 
  29. Hwang SH, Park DU. Ambient endotoxin and chemical pollutant (PM10, PM2.5, and O3) levels in South Korea. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2019; 19(4): 786-793. 
  30. Li R, Li Z, Gao W, Ding W, Xu Q, Song X. Diurnal, seasonal, and spatial variation of PM2.5 in Beijing. Sci Bull. 2015; 60(3): 387-395. 
  31. Park J, Kim E, Choe Y, Ryu H, Kim S, Woo BL, et al. Indoor to outdoor ratio of fine particulate matter by time of the day in house according to time-activity patterns. J Environ Health Sci. 2020; 46(5): 504-512. 
  32. Kim H, Jung KM. Seasonal variations of human exposure to residential fine particles (PM2.5) and particle-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Chuncheon. J Environ Toxicol. 2006; 21(1): 57-69. 
  33. Birjandi N, Ghobadi M, Ahmadi M. Analysis and zoning of air pollution in urban landscape using different models of spatial analysis (case study: Tehran). Adv Environ Technol. 2019; 5(3): 185-191. 
  34. Lin J, Zhang A, Chen W, Lin M. Estimates of daily PM2.5 exposure in Beijing using spatio-temporal kriging model. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8): 2772. 
  35. Yang WH, Kim DH, Son BS, Yoon CS, Lee KY, Lee JD, et al. Research on personal exposure assessment according to national daily activity time patterns (II). Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2010 Jul. Report No.: TRKO201300007829. 
  36. Scibor M, Balcerzak B, Galbarczyk A, Targosz N, Jasienska G. Are we safe inside? Indoor air quality in relation to outdoor concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 and to characteristics of homes. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019; 48: 101537. 
  37. Kim S, Kang K, Park D, Kim T. Assessment of PM2.5 penetration based on airflow paths in Korean classrooms. Build Environ. 2024; 248: 111103. 
  38. Yang J, Nam I, Sohn JR. The influence of seasonal characteristics in elderly thermal comfort in Korea. Energy Build. 2016; 128: 583-591. 
  39. Lee K, Lee D. The relationship between indoor and outdoor temperature in two types of residence. Energy Procedia. 2015; 78: 2851-2856. 
  40. See SW, Balasubramanian R. Risk assessment of exposure to indoor aerosols associated with Chinese cooking. Environ Res. 2006; 102(2): 197-204. 
  41. See SW, Karthikeyan S, Balasubramanian R. Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to particulate-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with Chinese, Malay and Indian cooking. J Environ Monit. 2006; 8(3): 369-376. 
  42. See SW, Balasubramanian R. Chemical characteristics of fine particles emitted from different gas cooking methods. Atmos Environ. 2008; 42(39): 8852-8862. 
  43. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Household use of solid fuels and high-temperature frying. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010; 95: 1-430. 
  44. Wang B, Tang Z, Li Y, Cai N, Hu X. Experiments and simulations of human walking-induced particulate matter resuspension in indoor environments. J Clean Prod. 2021; 295: 126488. 
  45. Geng Y, Lin B, Yu J, Zhou H, Ji W, Chen H, et al. Indoor environmental quality of green office buildings in China: large-scale and long-term measurement. Build Environ. 2019; 150: 266-280. 
  46. Tanaka N, Munaka T. Influence of human behavior on indoor air quality in a care facility for the elderly in Japan. Asian J Atmos Environ. 2021; 15(4): 2021089. 
  47. Delgado-Rodriguez M, Llorca J. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58(8): 635-641. 
  48. Seppanen OA, Fisk WJ, Mendell MJ. Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. Indoor Air. 1999; 9(4): 226-252.