DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Potential impact of metal crowns at varying distances from a carious lesion on its detection on cone-beam computed tomography scans with several protocols

  • Matheus Barros-Costa (Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento (Radiology Area, Dental School, University of Pernambuco) ;
  • Iago Filipe Correia-Dantas (Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Matheus L. Oliveira (Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Deborah Queiroz Freitas (Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
  • Received : 2023.09.09
  • Accepted : 2023.12.09
  • Published : 2024.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the impact of artifacts generated by metal crowns on the detection of proximal caries lesions in teeth at various distances using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, the diagnostic impacts of tube current and metal artifact reduction (MAR) were investigated. Materials and Methods: Thirty teeth were arranged within 10 phantoms, each containing 1 first premolar, 1 second premolar, and 1 second molar. A sound first molar (for the control group) or a tooth with a metal crown was placed. Of the 60 proximal surfaces evaluated, 15 were sound and 45 exhibited enamel caries. CBCT scans were acquired using an OP300 Maxio unit (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland), while varying the tube current (4, 8, or 12.5 mA) and enabling or disabling MAR. Five observers assessed mesial and distal surfaces using a 5-point scale. Multi-way analysis of variance was employed for data comparison, with P<0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) varied from 0.40 to 0.60 (sensitivity: 0.28-0.45, specificity: 0.44-0.80). The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly affected by the presence of a metal crown, milliamperage, or MAR(P>0.05). However, the overall AUC and specificity were significantly lower for surfaces near a crown (P<0.05). Conclusion: CBCT-based caries detection was not influenced by the presence of a metal crown, variations in milliamperage, or MAR activation. However, the diagnostic accuracy was low and was further diminished for surfaces near a crown. Consequently, CBCT is not recommended for the detection of incipient caries lesions.

Keywords

References

  1. Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S. Radiographic caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 924-33.
  2. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 18-22.
  3. Kulczyk T, Dyszkiewicz Konwinska M, Owecka M, Krzyzostaniak J, Surdacka A. The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20130342.
  4. Cebe F, Aktan AM, Ozsevik AS, Ciftci ME, Surmelioglu HD. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123: 392-400.
  5. Abu El-Ela WH, Farid MM, Abou El-Fotouh M. The impact of different dental restorations on detection of proximal caries by cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26: 2413-20.
  6. Neves FS, Freitas DQ, Campos PS, Ekestubbe A, Lofthag-Hansen S. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: the influence of imaging modes and root canal materials. J Endod 2014; 40: 1530-6.
  7. Vedpathak PR, Gondivkar SM, Bhoosreddy AR, Shah KR, Verma GR, Mehrotra GP, et al. Cone beam computed tomography - an effective tool in detecting caries under fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: ZC10-3.
  8. Isman O, Aktan AM, Ertas ET. Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 2487-96.
  9. Freitas DQ, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M. Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 1263-70.
  10. Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Demirturk Kocasarac H, Bechara B, Noujeim M. Evaluation and reduction of artifacts generated by 4 different root-end filling materials by using multiple cone-beam computed tomography imaging settings. J Endod 2016; 42: 307-14.
  11. Gaeta-Araujo H, Nascimento EH, Oliveira-Santos N, Pinheiro MC, Coelho-Silva F, Oliveira-Santos C. Influence of adjacent teeth restored with metal posts in the detection of simulated internal root resorption using CBCT. Int Endod J 2020; 53: 1299-306.
  12. Gaeta-Araujo H, Silva de Souza GQ, Freitas DQ, de Oliveira-Santos C. Optimization of tube current in cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of vertical root fractures with different intracanal materials. J Endod 2017; 43: 1668-73.
  13. Tangari-Meira R, Vancetto JR, Dovigo LN, Tosoni GM. Influence of tube current settings on diagnostic detection of root fractures using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Endod 2017; 43: 1701-5.
  14. Fontenele RC, Nascimento EH, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M, Freitas DQ. Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018; 47: 20180021.
  15. Oliveira ML, Ambrosano GM, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Tosoni GM. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 469-73.
  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
  17. Power M, Fell G, Wright M. Principles for high-quality, high-value testing. Evid Based Med 2013; 18: 5-10.
  18. Krzyzostaniak J, Surdacka A, Kulczyk T, Dyszkiewicz-Konwinska M, Owecka M. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions. Caries Res 2014; 48: 461-6.
  19. Cheng JG, Zhang ZL, Wang XY, Zhang ZY, Ma XC, Li G. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1015-21.
  20. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images. Eur J Radiol 2011; 79: 2009-12.
  21. Kamburoglu K, Sonmez G, Berktas ZS, Kurt H, Ozen D. Effects of various cone-beam computed tomography settings on the detection of recurrent caries under restorations in extracted primary teeth. Imaging Sci Dent 2017; 47: 109-15.
  22. Sousa Melo SL, Belem MD, Prieto LT, Tabchoury CP, Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 124: 306-14.
  23. Wenzel A, Hirsch E, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Scaf G, Frydenberg M. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 39458105.
  24. Gaalaas L, Tyndall D, Mol A, Everett ET, Bangdiwala A. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150281.
  25. Galvao NS, Nascimento EH, Lima CA, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML. Can a high-density dental material affect the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic images? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019; 48: 20180331.