한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 대학 연구윤리지침의 연구데이터 관련 내용 분석

A Study on the Analyzing Research Data-related Content in the Research Ethics Guidelines of Korean Universities

  • 장수현 (중앙대학교 문헌정보학과 ) ;
  • 남영준 (중앙대학교 문헌정보학전공 )
  • 투고 : 2024.02.21
  • 심사 : 2024.03.07
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 변화하는 연구 환경에 맞춘 국내 대학의 연구윤리지침의 방향성을 제안하는 것이다. 이를 위해 국내외 연구윤리지침과 연구진실성 관련 원칙을 분석해 연구데이터 관리와 연구진실성 간 연관성을 파악하였으며 해외 연구전문대학의 연구데이터 관련 지침 현황을 확인하였다. 이러한 분석 결과와 국내 4년제 대학 204개교를 대상으로 대학 연구윤리지침에서 나타난 "연구데이터" 관련 내용의 통계 결과를 비교해 본 연구는 국가 차원의 연구윤리지침인 연구윤리 확보를 위한 지침과 각 대학의 연구윤리지침의 연구데이터 관련 측면에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다.

The purpose of this study is to suggest the direction of korean universities' research ethics guidelines in line with the changing research environment. To this end, the relationship between research data management and research integrity was identified by analyzing domestic and international research ethics guidelines and principles related to research integrity, and the current status of research data-related guidelines of overseas research colleges was confirmed. Comparing the results of this analysis with the statistical results of the contents related to "research data" in the university research ethics guidelines for 204 four-year universities in Korea, this study drew implications for securing research ethics, which are national research ethics guidelines, and for aspects related to research data in each university's research ethics guidelines.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bak, JiWon & Chang, WooKwon (2021). A study on factors affecting the reuse of research data by academic researchers in the social sciences. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(4), 199-230. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.4.199
  2. Chae, HyunSoo, Chun, JungHyun, Kim, Giyeong, & Lee, JeeYeon (2021). A study on the perceptions and experiences of university constituents on research data management. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(4), 173-198. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.4.173
  3. Guidelines for ensuring research ethics. Ministry of Educaton Commandments Act No.449
  4. Hanyang University (2022). Hanyang University research ethics regulations Available: https://research.hanyang.ac.kr/support/ethics_data.php
  5. KAIST LIBRARY [n,d]. DMP writing guide. Available: https://library.kaist.ac.kr/rsrchLrnSport/dmpSupport/tab2.do
  6. Kim, Haklae (2021). FAIR principles: considerations for implementing digital archives from a data perspective. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.2.155
  7. Kim, Moonjeong & Kim, SeongHee (2015). A study on the factors affecting sharing of research data of science and technology researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(2), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313
  8. Kim, Seonghun & Oh, SamGyun (2018). Key factors in the implementation of research data management services. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.141
  9. Lee, InJae (2010). Research integrity and research ethics. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 21, 269-290.
  10. Lee, InJae (2016). The backgrounds and main contents of the revised guideline for securing of research ethics. Asian J Beauty Cosmetol, 14(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2016.0035
  11. Ministry of Government Legislation (2023. 09. 27.). Proposed legislation to promote national research data management and utilization. Available: https://www.moleg.go.kr/lawinfo/makingInfo.mo?lawSeq=74834&lawCd=0&lawType=TYPE5&mid=a10104010000
  12. Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (2023). National R&D Research Ethics Guide (Revisioned version).
  13. National Research And Development Information Processing Standards. Announcements of Ministry of Science and ICT. Act No. 2020-102
  14. National Research Foundation of Korea (2023). 2022 University Research Ethics Survey Report.
  15. Park, Miyoung, Ahn, Inja, & Kim, Junmo (2018). A study on use case of research data sharing in biotechnology. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 29(1), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.1.393
  16. Pusan National University (2019). Guidelines for securing research ethics at Pusan National University Available: https://sanhak.pusan.ac.kr/Board/BoardView.aspx?CategoryNo=0&PageNo=1&KeyWord=&KeyField=TITLE&CategoryYN=N&BoardNo=132650&BoardMstNo=10
  17. SCIENCES PROMOTION ACT. Act No. 17954
  18. Seoul National University (2023). Seoul National University research ethics guidelines Available: https://snurnd.snu.ac.kr/?q=node/724
  19. Shim, Wonsik (2016). A case study of U.S. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311
  20. Shim, Yunhee & Kim, Jihyun (2019). A study on the development of research data management service in a domestic university library: focused on the analysis on the needs of researchers affiliated in Seoul National University. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(3), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.3.061
  21. STAR Library [n.d]. Research Data Management. Available: https://starlibrary.org/research-data-management
  22. All European Academies (2023a). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Available: https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
  23. All European Academies (2023b). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - Revised Edition 2023. Berlin. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECOC
  24. Armond, A. C. V. & Kakuk, P. (2023). Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil. Accountability in Research, 30(3), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969
  25. Aubert Bonn N., Godecharle S., & Dierickx K. (2017). European universities' guidance on research integrity and misconduct. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. JERHRE, 12(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616688980
  26. Dunie, M. (2017). The importance of research data management: The value of electronic laboratory notebooks in the management of data integrity and data availability. Information Services & Use, 37(3), 355-359.
  27. Errington, T. M., Iorns, E., Gunn, W., Tan, F. E., Lomax, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research. Elife, 3, e04333.
  28. Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A.-M., Foeger, N., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
  29. Pilat, D. & Fukasaku, Y. (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Data Science Journal, 6, OD4-OD11.
  30. Sorensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Marusic, A., Elizondo, A. R., Kavouras, P., Tijdink, J. K., & Bendtsen, A. K. (2021). Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-15.
  31. World Conferences on Research Integrity [n.d.]. Hong Kong Principles. Available: https://www.wcrif.org/guidance/hong-kong-principles
  32. Yi, N., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2019). How do chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? a review of university documents. Developing World Bioethics, 19(2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12231
  33. Zhaksylyk, A., Zimba, O., Yessirkepov, M., & Kocyigit, B. F. (2023). Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(47), e405. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405
  34. 池内 有為, 林 和弘, [n.d.], 研究データ公開と研究データ管理に関する実態調査2022:⽇本におけるオープン サイエンスの現状: 文部科学省 科学技術.学術政策研究所.