Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Awareness Patterns Regarding Radiation Safety Management in Fields Related to Radiation Safety Regulations: Focusing on Companies that Must Report Radiation Sources

  • Eunok Han (Department of Education & Research, Korea Academy of Nuclear Safety) ;
  • Yoonseok Choi (Department of Education & Research, Korea Academy of Nuclear Safety)
  • Received : 2022.09.12
  • Accepted : 2024.02.13
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze radiation safety management and regulatory perceptions, focusing on companies that must report radiation sources. The intent is to reduce the gap between regulation measures and addressing real concerns while improving practical safety management measures and regulations for all stakeholders. Materials and Methods: Radiation safety officers at a total of 244 reporting companies using radiation generators (79.8%) and sealed radioisotopes (15.1%) were surveyed using a questionnaire. Results and Discussion: The perception that regulation is stronger than the actual risk of the radiation source used was 3.47 points (out of 5 points), indicating a score above average. The most important factors and considerations were education and training (48%) as a human factor, safety devices of the radiation source (71.3%) as a hazardous material factor, the use of radiation (50.8%) as an organizational environment, and the radiation effect of nearby facilities (67.2%) as a physical environment. Radiation safety management educational experience (F= 5.030, p< 0.01), the group with high subjective knowledge (t= 6.017, p< 0.001), and the group with high objective knowledge (t= 1.989, p< 0.05) was found to be better at radiation safety management. Conclusion: It is necessary to standardize the educational experience regarding radiation safety management because each staff member has individual differences in educational experience. It is necessary to provide more information on how to solve radiation accidents via educational content. Applying radiation safety regulations based on the factors that significantly affect radiation safety management shown in this survey will help improve safety.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by ministry of nuclear safety and security commission of South Korea (Grant No. 12218087800). This work was supported by the project coordinated by ministry of nuclear safety and security commission in Korea. We thank our co-researchers in the project. The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. Kim SH, Jang W. A legal study on the nuclear safety administration system: focused on the nuclear safety commission. Yonsei ILS J. 2013;23(4):241-274.
  2. Park KS. Reexamination of nuclear safety legislation. Adm Law J. 2012;33:169-190.
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency. Human and organizational aspects of assuring nuclear safety: exploring 30 years of safety culture. IAEA; 2019.
  4. Choi YS, Jung SJ, Choi KS. Safety culture of regulatory body: its expectations and limitations as a complementary role for nuclear safety regulatory institutions. J Regul Stud. 2020;29(2):197-224.
  5. Park SJ. Safety culture management for safety reinforcement of public institutions. KIPF Public Inst Issue Focus. 2019;31:77-82.
  6. Lee SK, Park CB, Yoon YS. Research about researcher's safety ethnic level and improvement extent of safety culture, based on organizational safety efforts. J Korean Soc Saf. 2015;30(3):123-134.
  7. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission. Nuclear safety act no. 18972 [Internet]. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; 2022 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%EC%9B%90%EC%9E%90%EB%A0%A5%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EB%B2%95#undefined
  8. Cho J, Jang KS. Legal issues for safety regulation of atomic energy and management of nuclear spent fuel. Law Rev. 2015;58:61-94.
  9. Han EO. Development of a measurement tool for radiation safety regulations. J Korea Acad-Ind Coop Soc. 2012;13(12):6203-6207.
  10. Han EO, Cho DH. Differences between each requirement for radiation safety regulation levels. J Radiat Prot. 2012;37(4):219-225.
  11. Lim JH, Choi YS, Chung YH. Identification of good practices for safety culture through the analysis of successful work cases based on safety-II concept. J Ergon Soc Korea. 2020;39(4):291-302.
  12. International Atomic Energy Agency. The management system for nuclear installations: safety guide, No. GS-G-3.5. IAEA; 2009.
  13. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Safety culture common language (NUREG-2165) [Internet]. U.S. NRC; 2014 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr2165/index.html
  14. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96-102.
  15. Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The role of the nuclear regulator in promoting and evaluating safety culture: NEA no. 1547. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; 1999.
  16. Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership: the Jossey-Bass business & management series. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  17. Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The characteristics of an effective nuclear regulator: NEA no. 7185. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; 2014.
  18. Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The safety culture of an effective nuclear regulatory body: NEA no. 7247. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; 2016.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency. Ensuring robust national nuclear safety systems. Institutional strength in depth: a report by the International Nuclear Safety Group. IAEA; 2017.
  20. Hwang I, Park JH. A study on safety culture compliance in nuclear power plant organization. Korean Syst Dyn Rev. 2019;20(3):49-74.
  21. International Atomic Energy Agency. Governmental, legal and regulatory framework for safety: general safety requirements. IAEA; 2016.
  22. Hong I, Baek JB. Towards an effective assessment of safety culture. J Korean Soc Saf. 2016;31(1):118-125.
  23. Jeon GS, Yoon JH. A study on promoting safety culture in public institutions and improving management assessment indicators: focusing on disaster safety management indicators for public enterprise through AHP analysis. J Korean Reg Econ. 2021;49:95-124.