DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

What Drives Purchase Intention in Live-streaming Commerce in South Korea? Perspectives of IT Affordance and Streamer Characteristics

  • Jinyoung Nam (Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hanbyul Choi (Department of Management Information Systems, Dong-A University) ;
  • Yoonhyuk Jung (School of Media and Communication, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.26
  • 심사 : 2024.06.21
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30

초록

Live-streaming commerce has gained popularity in recent years, shifting users' shopping patterns from traditional experiences to real-time interactions, by delivering information and entertainment to users. Drawing upon the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework, this study investigates the influence of perceived live-streaming affordance and perceived streamer characteristics on users' cognitive and emotional states (enjoyment, psychological distance, trust) and behavioral response (purchase intention) from a live-streaming commerce perspective. The data were collected through a survey administered to South Korean respondents with prior experience in using live-streaming commerce. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method was used to verify the relationships proposed in the model. The results showed that perceived live-streaming affordance and perceived streamer characteristics have a positive impact on enjoyment and trusting the seller, reducing psychological distance and promoting users' purchase behavior. The results provide theoretical and practical insights into the psychological mechanisms of live-streaming commerce that influence the psychological distance felt by users towards the products. Relevant managerial implications are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. PWC. (2020). Pulling the future forward: The entertainment and media industry reconfigures amid recovery. Global Entertainment & Media Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/jp/ja/knowledge/thoughtleadership/2020/assets/pdf/outlook2020-global.pdf
  2. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., and Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886
  3. Statista. (2023). Interest in livestream commerce from online shoppers worldwide as of April 2021, by region. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1275093/global-consumer-appetite-for-livestream-commerce/
  4. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Ready for prime time? The state of live commerce. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/ready-for-prime-time-the-state-of-live-commerce
  5. Emarketer. (2023). Live Commerce 2023 - What Retailers in Asia-Pacific and the US Need to Know Now. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/content/live-commerce-2023
  6. GlobalData. (2023). South Korea e-commerce market to surpass $160 billion mark in 2027, forecasts GlobalData. Retrieved from https://www.globaldata.com/media/banking/south-korea-e-commerce-market-to-surpass-160-billion-mark-in-2027-forecasts-globaldata/
  7. Statista. (2024a). Live commerce market size South Korea 2020-2023. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1238226/south-korea-live-commerce-market-size/
  8. Ebest Investment & Securities. (2020). Live streaming commerce is alive. Retrieved from https://ssl.pstatic.net/imgstock/upload/research/industry/1600644329845.pdf
  9. Reuters. (2023). YouTube to launch its first official shopping channel in South Korea, Yonhap reports.
  10. Ma, Y. (2021). To shop or not: Understanding Chinese consumers' live-stream shopping intentions from the perspectives of uses and gratifications, perceived network size, perceptions of digital celebrities, and shopping orientations. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101562
  11. Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., and Zhao, L. (2022). How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107052
  12. Choi, E. J., and Jeon, S. M. (2022). How IT affordance influences engagement in live commerce: An empirical analysis focusing on social cues as moderating effect. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 327-353. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2022.32.2.327
  13. Hu, M., and Chaudhry, S. S. (2020). Enhancing consumer engagement in e-commerce live streaming via relational bonds. Internet Research, 30(3), 1019-1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0082
  14. Fengliang, X. I. E., and Jianhong, L. U. O. (2021, March). Research on the influence of live streaming commerce affordances on consumers' impulse purchase intention based on SPSS25. 0 and Amos23. 0. In 2021 2nd International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology (ECIT) (pp. 95-99). IEEE.
  15. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., and Nie, K. (2020). A 2020 perspective on "How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective". Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 40, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100958
  16. Yang, Q., Huo, J., Li, H., Xi, Y., and Liu, Y. (2023). Can social interaction-oriented content trigger viewers' purchasing and gift-giving behaviors? Evidence from live-streaming commerce. Internet Research, 33(7), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2021-0861
  17. Li, Y., and Peng, Y. (2021). What drives gift-giving intention in live streaming? The perspectives of emotional attachment and flow experience. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(14), 1317-1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1885224
  18. Xu, X., Wu, J. H., and Li, Q. (2020). What Drives Consumer Shopping Behavior in Live Streaming Commerce? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 21(3), 144-167.
  19. Statista. (2024b). eCommerce - South Korea. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/outlook/emo/ecommerce/south-korea
  20. KCA. (2020). Convergence of content and commerce: Trends and prospects of media commerce. Media Issues & Trends. Retrieved from https://www.kca.kr/Media_Issue_Trend/vol44/KCA_Media_Issue_Trend_vol44.pdf
  21. Statista. (2022). Popular live commerce websites and apps South Korea 2021. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1259450/south-korea-popular-live-commerce-platforms/
  22. Ked Global. (2023). Live commerce app Grip aims to expand into Japan, US in 2024. Retrieved from https://www.kedglobal.com/e-commerce/newsView/ked202309200019
  23. Lin, G. Y., Lee, M. X., and Wang, Y. S. (2023). Developing and validating a live streaming social commerce success model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2251417
  24. Yang, Q., and Lee, Y. C. (2023). The effect of live streaming commerce quality on customers' purchase intention: extending the elaboration likelihood model with herd behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(5), 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196355
  25. Shang, Q., Ma, H., Wang, C., and Gao, L. (2023). Effects of background fitting of e-commerce live streaming on consumers' purchase intentions: a cognitive-affective perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S393492
  26. Chen, H., Dou, Y., and Xiao, Y. (2023). Understanding the role of live streamers in live-streaming e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 59, 101266. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141 864
  27. Shin, H. R., Oh, C. H., Kim, N. Y., Choi, H. B., Kim, B. Y., and Ji, Y. G. (2024). Evaluating and eliciting design requirements for an improved user experience in live-streaming commerce interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107990. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4498305
  28. Xin, B., Hao, Y., and Xie, L. (2023). Strategic product showcasing mode of E-commerce live streaming. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103360
  29. Luo, X., Lim, W. M., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Live streaming commerce: a review and research agenda. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2290574
  30. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. NY: Psychology Press.
  31. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2), 67-82.
  32. Markus, M. L., and Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 609-632. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
  33. Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, K., and Zhang, C. (2020). Examining user satisfaction and stickiness in social networking sites from a technology affordance lens: uncovering the moderating effect of user experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(7), 1331-1360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0614
  34. Koroleva, K., and Kane, G. C. (2017). Relational affordances of information processing on Facebook. Information & Management, 54(5), 560-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.007
  35. Tang, J., and Zhang, P. (2020). The impact of atmospheric cues on consumers' approach and avoidance behavioral intentions in social commerce websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 105729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.038
  36. Lin, J., Luo, Z., Cheng, X., and Li, L. (2019). Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study. Information & Management, 56(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.05.009
  37. Fang, Y. H., Li, C. Y., and Bhatti, Z. A. (2020). Building brand loyalty and endorsement with brand pages: integration of the lens of affordance and customer-dominant logic. Information Technology & People, 34(2), 731-769. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2019-0208
  38. Dong, X., Wang, T., and Benbasat, I. (2016). IT affordances in online social commerce: Conceptualization validation and scale development Trans. In Americas Conference on Information Systems. Reprinted from https://web.archive.org/web/20160922145456id_/http://aisel.aisnet.org:80/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=amcis2016
  39. Li, P., Lee, S. Y., Lee, K. Y., Yang, S. B., and Chang, Y. H. (2023). What makes viewers engage in live streaming shopping during and after the pandemic: an affordance perspective. Service Business, 17(4), 963-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00542-y
  40. Xiong, J., Wang, Y., and Li, Z. (2023). Understanding the relationship between IT affordance and consumers' purchase intention in e-commerce live streaming: the moderating effect of gender. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2250607
  41. Yan, Y., Chen, H., Shao, B., and Lei, Y. (2023). How IT affordances influence customer engagement in live streaming commerce? A dual-stage analysis of PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103390
  42. Hovland, C. I., and Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
  43. Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication-A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2), 1-33.
  44. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  45. Sautter, P., Hyman, M. R., and Lukosius, V. (2004). E-tail atmospherics: A critique of the literature and model extension. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), 14-24.
  46. Nguyen, B., Melewar, T. C., and Chen, J. (2013). A framework of brand likeability: An exploratory study of likeability in firm-level brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(4), 368-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2013.790472
  47. Andersen, K., and Clevenger Jr, T. (1963). A summary of experimental research in ethos. Communications Monographs, 30(2), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/
  48. Baker, M. J., and Churchill Jr, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151194
  49. Bhatt, N., Jayswal, R. M., and Patel, J. D. (2013). Impact of celebrity endorser's source credibility on attitude towards advertisements and brands. South Asian Journal of Management, 20(4), 74-95.
  50. Heo, J. K., Kim, Y. J., and Yan, J. (2020). Sustainability of live video streamer's strategies: Live streaming video platform and audience's social capital in South Korea. Sustainability, 12(5), 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051969
  51. Yu, H. J., and Kim, H. (2020). The Effect of Influencer Factors in Personal Media Contents on Purchase Intention. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.01.045
  52. Yang, S. C., Feng, T. T., and Wang, Y. H. (2019). Exploring the influencing factors of live-streaming viewers' participation intention from the perspective of source credibility model and cognitive load-an example of mobile device users. In International Conference on Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research, 1131, (pp. 79-92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1758-7_7
  53. Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press.
  54. Li, C. Y. (2019). How social commerce constructs influence customers' social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.026
  55. Tuncer, İ. (2021). The relationship between IT affordance, flow experience, trust, and social commerce intention: An exploration using the SOR paradigm. Technology in Society, 65, 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101567
  56. Zhao, Q., Chen, C. D., Cheng, H. W., and Wang, J. L. (2018). Determinants of live streamers' continuance broadcasting intentions on Twitch: A self-determination theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.018
  57. Liu, X., and Oda, T. (2021). The impact of the Live streamer on Trust in China during COVID-19 pandemic. In ISPIM Conference.
  58. Park, H. J., and Lin, L. M. (2020). The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934
  59. Bagozzi, R. P. (1986). Principles of Marketing Management. Science Research Associates.
  60. Cai, J., Wohn, D. H. Y., Mittal, A., and Sureshbabu, D. (2018). Utilitarian and hedonic motivations for live streaming shopping. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 81-88). https://doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3210837
  61. Llorens-Largo, F., Gallego-Durán, F. J., Villagrá-Arnedo, C. J., Compañ-Rosique, P., Satorre-Cuerda, R., and Molina-Carmona, R. (2016). Gamification of the learning process: lessons learned. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 11(4), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1109/rita.2016.2619138
  62. Wongkitrungrueng A., and Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032
  63. Friedrich, T., Schlauderer, S., and Overhage, S. (2019). The impact of social commerce feature richness on website stickiness through cognitive and affective factors: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36, 100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100861
  64. Tseng, C. H., and Wei, L. F. (2020). The efficiency of mobile media richness across different stages of online consumer behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.010
  65. Kim, J. B. (2015). The mediating role of presence on consumer intention to participate in a social commerce site. Journal of Internet Commerce, 14(4), 425-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2015.1092067
  66. Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., and Oh, W. S. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 789-810. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042809
  67. Chang, H. H., and Chen, S. W. (2008). The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator. Online Information Review, 32(6), 818-841. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810923953
  68. Hsu, M. H., Chuang, L. W., and Hsu, C. S. (2014). Understanding online shopping intention: the roles of four types of trust and their antecedents. Internet Research, 24(3), 332-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2013-0007
  69. Wang, Y. D., and Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in human behavior, 21(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008
  70. Wang, Y., and Herrando, C. (2019). Does privacy assurance on social commerce sites matter to millennials? International Journal of Information Management, 44, 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.016
  71. Lu, B., and Chen, Z. (2021). Live streaming commerce and consumers' purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Information & Management, 58(7), 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103509
  72. Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
  73. Edwards, S. M., Lee, J. K., and Ferle, C. L. (2009). Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2009.10722161
  74. Hernández-Ortega, B. (2018). Don't believe strangers: Online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Information & Management, 55(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.007
  75. Alalwan, A. A. (2018). Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.001
  76. Dong, X., and Wang, T. (2018). Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: The role of IT affordances. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.002
  77. Xue, J., Liang, X., Xie, T., and Wang, H. (2020). See now, act now: How to interact with customers to enhance social commerce engagement? Information & Management, 57(6), 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103324
  78. Handayani, R. C., Purwandari, B., Solichah, I., and Prima, P. (2018). The Impact of Instagram "Call-to-Action" Buttons on Customers' Impulse Buying. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278252.32782
  79. Chen, C. C., and Lin, Y. C. (2018). What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003
  80. Zhou, M., Huang, J., Wu, K., Huang, X., Kong, N., and Campy, K. S. (2021). Characterizing Chinese consumers' intention to use live e-commerce shopping. Technology in Society, 67, 101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101767
  81. Yahia, I. B., Al-Neama, N., and Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.021
  82. Becker, J. M., Klein, K., and Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long range planning, 45(5-6), 359-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
  83. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., and Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  84. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285-309.
  85. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., and Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  86. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  87. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., and Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
  88. Kang, K., Lu, J., Guo, L., and Li, W. (2021). The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102251
  89. Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., and Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of SOR theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012
  90. Zhang, L., Chen, M., and Zamil, A. M. A. (2023). Live stream marketing and consumers' purchase intention: An IT affordance perspective using the SOR paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1069050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069050
  91. Guo, Y., Zhang, K., and Wang, C. (2022). Way to success: Understanding top streamer's popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102786
  92. Faraj, S., and Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, 237(1), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0012
  93. Yu, J. E., Ha, I. S., Choi, M. K., and Rho, J. J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management, 42(7), 965-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001
  94. Saffanah, L., Handayani, P. W., and Sunarso, F. P. (2023). Actual purchases on Instagram Live Shopping: The influence of live shopping engagement and information technology affordance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.09.002
  95. Arenas-Márquez, F. J., Martínez-Torres, M. R., and Toral, S. L. (2021). How can trustworthy influencers be identified in electronic word-of-mouth communities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120596
  96. McKinsey Digital. (2021). It's showtime! How live commerce is transforming the shopping experience. McKinsey & Company Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/its-showtime-how-live-commerce-is-transforming-the-shopping-experience
  97. Obeidat, M. S., and Young, W. D. (2017). An assessment of the recognition and use of online shopping by digital immigrants and natives in India and China. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2017.1391426