Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Legal Information Landmark, Court Library, Knowledge Information Sharing, Function and Role Expansion, Legal Information Hub

법률정보허브로서 법원도서관의 지식정보공유 기능과 역할 강화에 관한 연구

  • 곽승진 (충남대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 노영희 (건국대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 장인호 (대진대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 강봉숙 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 고재민 (수원대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.23
  • Accepted : 2024.06.09
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we aim to comprehensively examine how court libraries can enhance their function and role as a hub for judicial information sharing. To achieve this, the current status was holistically understood based on literature review, case studies, interviews with stakeholders, and surveys targeted at users. The study sought to explore and present ways in which court libraries can play a central role in the dissemination and sharing of legal knowledge. As a result of the research, we propose four roles of the judicial information sharing complex center as a court library, five functions of the judicial information sharing complex center, and nine strategies to enhance accessibility for the spread of legal culture. If court libraries function as next-generation shared complex centers with the goal of popularizing legal knowledge culture, it would be possible to expand access to legal knowledge for citizens interested in law and culture, professionals in legal and educational institutions, and residents living near the center.

본 연구에서는 법원도서관이 법률정보허브로서 어떻게 지식정보공유의 기능과 역할을 강화할 수 있는지에 대해 다각도로 조명하고자 하며, 이를 위해 문헌조사, 사례조사, 관계자 면담, 그리고 이용자를 대상으로 한 설문을 기반으로 현황을 총체적으로 파악하고, 이를 기반으로 법원도서관이 법률 지식의 보급과 공유에 있어서 중추적인 역할을 할 수 있는 방안을 모색하여 제시하고자 하였다. 연구결과, 법원도서관의 역할 및 기능으로, 4가지의 사법부 지식정보 공유 복합센터로서의 역할, 다섯 가지의 사법부 지식정보 공유 복합센터로서의 기능, 그리고 9가지의 법률 문화 확산을 위한 접근성 확대 방안을 제안하였다. 이렇게 법원도서관이 법률 지식 문화 대중화라는 목표를 가지고 차세대 공유 복합 센터로서의 기능을 수행한다면, 법률과 문화에 관심이 많은 국민과 법률 관련 기관 및 교육 기관 종사자, 센터의 근접지역에 거주하고 있는 국민을 상대로 법률 지식 접근성을 확대할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Sung-Eun & Jung, Jong-Kee (2011). An analysis of the current state of legal information usage education in the curriculum of Korean law schools. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(4), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.103
  2. Kim, Yong Hwan (2020). Text mining application methods for legal information systems: focused on defamation cases. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(1), 387-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.1.387
  3. Kwak, Jiyoung (2023). A study on user satisfaction and improvement measures for the Beopmaru service of court libraries. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 34(3), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2023.34.3.273
  4. Kwak, Seun-Jin & Noh, Yonghee (2018). A study on the analysis of user needs following the public service opening of court libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(3), 215-246. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.3.215
  5. Kwak, Seun-Jin, Noh, Yonghee, & Shin, Jae-Min (2017). A study on the spatial composition of libraries as complex cultural institutions. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(3), 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2017.28.3.007
  6. Noh, Younghee, Ahn, In-Ja, Choi, Man-Ho, & Ro, Ji-Yoon (2018). A study on deriving core values for public services of the Constitutional Court Library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(4), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.4.111
  7. Won, Jong Sam & Lee, Jee Yeon (2020). A study on legal commentary information services based on the usage patterns of legal information sources. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(1), 127-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.127
  8. Kadli, J. H. & Hanchinal, V. B. (2015). Information seeking behaviour of law students in the changing digital environment. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.1.8099
  9. Kumar, R. & Raghuveer, K. (2012). Legal document summarization using latent dirichlet allocation. International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3, 114-117.
  10. Leibon, G., Michael L., Reed H., Allen R., & Dan R. (2018). Bending the law: geometric tools for quantifying influence in the multinetwork of legal opinions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9224-2
  11. Makri, S., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: from ellis's model to design. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.001
  12. Solomon, Y. & Bronstein, J. (2016). Serendipity in legal information seeking behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2015-0056
  13. Van Der Haegen, M. (2017). Building a Legal Citation Network: The Influence of the Court of Cassation on the Lower Judiciary. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.406
  14. Winston, A., Roudik, P., Bavis, B., & Sokol, D. (2018). The law library of congress: a global resource for legal education. Journal of Legal Education, 67(4), 962-983.