Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Linking Structure for Authorized Access Point for Manifestation Based on the Current Bibliographic Trends in South Korea

국내 서지동향을 반영한 구현형의 전거형 접근점 연계 구조

  • 박믿음 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이승민 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.17
  • Accepted : 2024.06.04
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the bibliographic environment has been evolved towards linked data and semantic web, revision of KCR5 based on RDA is also in progress in Korea. Even authorized access points play an important role in identification and linkage between resources in the evolving bibliographic environment. However, the original RDA applied by KCR5 does not provide authorized access points for all entities. Based on the analysis of the authorized access point of manifestation in RDA 2020, this research identified properties and proposed a linking structure of the authorized access point that can be applied to the revision of KCR5. An authorized access point for manifestation is an access point that considers both intellectual and physical aspects, and can be the foundation for linking and identifying actual resources. The proposed structure is expected to be a linking structure for authority record optimized to the current bibliographic environment, which can be helpful in the practical application of the authorized access point for manifestation.

서지환경이 링크드 데이터, 시맨틱웹 기반으로 전환됨에 따라 국내에서도 RDA를 기반으로 한 KCR5 개정 작업을 진행 중에 있다. 변화하는 서지환경에서도 전거형 접근점은 자원의 식별 및 자원 간의 연계에 중요한 역할을 하고 있으나, KCR5가 준용하는 원본 RDA는 모든 개체에 대한 전거형 접근점이 마련되지 않은 상황이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 RDA 2020의 구현형의 전거형 접근점 분석을 토대로 국내 서지환경 및 원본 RDA에 적용 가능한 구현형의 전거형 접근점의 속성을 선정하고 연계 구조를 제안하였다. 구현형의 전거형 접근점은 지적 측면과 물리적 측면을 모두 고려한 접근점으로, 실제 자원의 연계와 식별이 더욱 원활해지는 토대를 마련할 수 있다. 또한 국내 서지환경에 적합한 구현형의 전거레코드 연계 구조 구성은 향후 구현형의 전거형 접근점의 실제적인 적용에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년도 중앙대학교 CAU GRS 지원에 의하여 작성되었음.

References

  1. Cho, Jane (2009). A study for RDA implementation scenarios and future bibliographic control. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.085
  2. Doh, Taehyeon (2012). A study on instructions for access points representing works and expressions in RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.43.3.201209.27
  3. Kim, Jeong Hyen (2013). A study on the direction for the revision of Korean cataloguing rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.4.201312.123
  4. KLA Cataloging Committee (2024). Korean Cataloging Rules (5th ed.) Draft. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  5. Lee, Eun Ju (2024). A study on the proposal of guideline for uniform title of legal works. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 58(1), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2024.58.1.329
  6. Lee, Mihwa (2016). A study on the construction of work and expression authority records. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.3.201609.71
  7. Lee, Mihwa (2023). A study on methods of describing manifestation applying RDA 2020. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(3), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.3.049
  8. Lee, Mihwa, Lee, Eun Ju, & Rho, Jee Hyun (2022). Cataloging trends after LRM and its acceptance in KORMARC bibliographic format. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 33(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2022.33.1.025
  9. Lee, Mihwa & Rho, Jee Hyun (2016). A study on the directions of authorized access point in KCR4. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 47-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201603.47
  10. Lee, Seungmin (2021). Construction of BIBFRAME-Based linking structure for interrelating bibliographic records for alternative format materials. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(3), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.3.281
  11. Metadata & Sustainable Access Division, National Library of Korea (2023). The National Bibliography 2030 Toward the Next Generation of Library Metadata. Available: https://www.oak.go.kr/nl-ir/handle/2020.oak/981
  12. Rho, Jee Hyun (2016a). Suggestions on the revision of Korean cataloging rules for personal name authority records and authorized access point. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 201-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201606.201
  13. Rho, Jee Hyun (2016b). A study on the language and script of authorized access points representing multilingual works. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.123
  14. Rho, Jee Hyun (2023). A study on constructing preferred titles and authorized acess point for religious works. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(4), 105-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.54.4.202312.105
  15. Rho, Jee Hyun, Lee, Mihwa, & Lee, Eun Ju (2023). Cataloging Theory and Practice. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  16. ALA, CFLA, & CILIP (2024). RDA Toolkit. Available: https://access.rdatoolkit.org/
  17. Delsey, T. (2009). RDA Database Implementation Scenarios. Available: http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/5editor2rev.pdf
  18. IFLA Study Group on the FRBR (2009). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Available: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr
  19. IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2009). Functional Requirements for Authority Data. 김태수 번역 (2012). 전거 데이터의 기능 요건(FRAD) 개념모형. 서울: 국립중앙도서관.
  20. RDA Steering Committee (2017). RDA original toolkit. Available: https://original.rdatoolkit.org/
  21. Taniguchi, S. (2012). Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model?. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(8), 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.712631
  22. 古川 肇 (2011). 体現形.個別資料に対する典拠形アクセスポイントはなぜ必要か. 資料組織化研究-e, 61, 31-34. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/8804313