DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase alone or combination of xylanase and β-glucanase on growth performance, meat quality, intestinal measurements, and nutrient utilization in broiler chickens

  • Deok Yun Kim (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kang Hyeon Kim (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Eun Cheol Lee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Ju Kyoung Oh (Application Center, CJ Blossom Park) ;
  • Min Ah Park (Application Center, CJ Blossom Park) ;
  • Dong Yong Kil (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2024.06.24
  • Accepted : 2024.08.30
  • Published : 2025.02.01

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase alone or combination of xylanase and β-glucanase in high non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) diets with low energy on growth performance, meat quality, intestinal measurements, stress responses, and energy and nutrient utilization in broiler chickens. Methods: A total of four hundred 8-d-old Ross 308 broiler chickens were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatment groups with 10 replicates. A positive control (PC) diet was formulated with adequate energy and nutrients, whereas a negative control (NC) diet had 100 kcal/kg less nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy than the PC diet with increasing inclusion of high NSP ingredients. Two additional diets were produced by supplementing 0.1% xylanase alone or 0.1% xylanase and β-glucanase mixture in the NC diet. Experiments lasted for 27 d. Results: Birds fed PC diets had less (p<0.05) feed conversion ratio (FCR) than those fed NC diets. Birds fed NC diets supplemented with xylanase alone or combination of xylanase and β-glucanase had less (p<0.05) FCR than those fed NC diets. Dietary supplementation of xylanase alone in NC diets exhibited the highest (p<0.05) breast meat pH among dietary treatments. Birds fed PC diets or NC diets supplemented with xylanase and β-glucanase combination exhibited greater (p<0.05) villus height:crypt depth ratio than those fed NC diets. Dietary supplementation of xylanase alone and combination of xylanase and β-glucanase in NC diets decreased (p<0.05) ileal digesta viscosity and increased (p<0.05) xylo-oligosaccharide concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) compared with NC diets without affecting energy and nutrient utilization in NC diets. Conclusion: Dietary supplementation of xylanase in high NSP diets with low energy concentrations improves growth performance by decreasing digesta viscosity and increasing concentrations of xylo-oligosaccharides in the GIT of broiler chickens. However, little additional benefits of β-glucanase supplementation in combination with xylanase are identified for broiler chickens.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship (Academic scholarship for College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources) in 2024.

References

  1. Knudsen KEB. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1997;67:319-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00009-6
  2. Choct M. Feed non-starch polysaccharides for monogastric animals: classification and function. Anim Prod Sci 2015;55:1360-6. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15276
  3. Bedford Ma, Schulze H. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutr Res Rev 1998;11:91-114. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19980007
  4. Baker JT, Duarte ME, Holanda DM, Kim SW. Friend orfoe? impacts ofdietary xylans, xylooligosaccharides, and xylanases on intestinal health and growth performance ofmonogastric animals. Animals 2021;11:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030609
  5. Bedford MR, ApajalahtiJH. The role offeed enzymes in main-taining poultry intestinal health.JSciFood Agric 2022;102:1759-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11670
  6. Kiarie E, Romero LF, Nyachoti CM. The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry. Nutr Res Rev 2013;26:71-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422413000048
  7. Kim HY, Moon J, Kim SW. Development and application of a multi-step porcine in vitro system to evaluate feedstuffs and feed additives for their efficacyin nutrient digestion, digesta characteristics, and intestinal immune responses. Anim Nutr 2024;17:265-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.01.006
  8. Kiarie E, Romero LF, Ravindran V. Growth performance, nutrient utilization, and digesta characteristics in broiler chickens fed corn or wheat diets without or with supplemental xylanase. Poult Sci 2014;93:1186-96. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03715
  9. Coppedge JR, Oden LA, RatliffB, Brown B, Ruch F Lee JT. Evaluation ofnonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes in broiler diets varying in nutrient and energy levels as mea-sured by broiler performance and processing parameters.] Appl Poult Res 2012:21:226-34 https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2011-00329
  10. Saleh AA, Kirrella AA, Abdo SE,etal. Effects ofdietaryxylanase and arabinofuranosidase combination on the growth perfor-mance, lipid peroxidation, blood constituents, and immune response of broilers fed low-energy diets. Animals 2019;9:467. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070467
  11. Slominski BA. Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets. Poult Sci 2011;90:2013-23. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01372
  12. Munyaka PM, Nandha NK, Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM,Khafipour E. Impact of combined 3-glucanase and xylanase enzymes on growth performance, nutrients utilization and gut micro-biota in broiler chickens fed corn or wheat-based diets. Poult Sci 2016;95:528-40. https://cloi.org/10.3382/ps/pev333
  13. Mathlouthi N, Mallet S. SaulnierL, Quemener B, Larbier M. Effects ofxylanase and 3-glucanase addition on performance, nutrient digestibility, and physico-chemical conditions in the small intestine contents and caecal microflora ofbroiler chickens fed a wheat and barley-based diet. Anim Res 2002;51:395-406. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2002034
  14. Kouzounis D, Kers JG, Soares N, Smidt H, Kabel MA, Schols HA. Cereal type and combined xylanase/glucanase supple-mentation influence the cecal microbiota composition in broilers. U Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022;13:51. https://doi.org10.1186/s40104-022-00702-6
  15. Aviagen. Ross 308 broiler: nutrition specifications. Huntsville, AL, USA: Aviagen Inc;2019.
  16. Choi WJ,Kim JH, Han GP,Kwon CH,KilDY. Effectsofdietary hatchery by-products on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, meat quality, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens. Anim Biosci 2021;34:1181-92. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0755
  17. Lentfer TL, Pendl H, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Frohlich E, Von Borell E. H/L ratio as a measurement of stress inlayinghens-methodology and reliability. Br Poult Sci 2015;56:157-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1008993
  18. Kim DY, Kim JH, Choi WJ, Han GP, Kil DY. Comparative effects ofdietary functional nutrients on growth performance, meat quality, immune responses, and stress biomarkers in broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions. Anim Biosci 2021;34:1839-48. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0230
  19. Wiersema ML, Koester LR, Schmitz-Esser S, Koltes DA. Comparison of intestinal permeability, morphology, and ileal microbial communities of commercial hens housed in conventional cages and cage-free housing systems. Poult Sci 2021;1001178-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.052
  20. Lee JH, Kwon CH, Won SY, Kim HW, Kil DY. Evaluation of tryptophan biomass as an alternative to conventional crystalline tryptophan in broiler diets. Appl Poult Res 2023;32:100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjapr.2022.100302
  21. AOAC International. Official methods ofanalysis of AOAC International 18th Ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2007.
  22. Kim JW, Kim JH, Shin JE, Kil DY. Relative bioavailability of copper in tribasic copper chloride to copperin copper sulfate forlaying hens based on eggyolkand feather copper concen-trations. Poult Sci 2016;95:1591-7. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew049
  23. Kim JH, Park GH, Han GP, Kil DY. Effect offeeding corn distillers dried grains with solubles naturally contaminated with deoxynivalenol on growth performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and utilization ofenergy and nutrients in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2021;100:101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101215
  24. Wolynetz MS, Sibbald IR. Relationships between apparent and true metabolizable energy and the effects ofa nitrogen correction. PoultSci 1984;63:1386-99.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0631386
  25. Cowieson AJ, Bedford MR, Ravindran V.Interactions between xylanase and glucanase in maize-soy-based diets for broilers. Br Poult Sci 2010;51:246-57.https://doi.org/10.1080/00071661003789347
  26. Ebringerova A, Heinze T.Xylan andxylan derivatives-biopoly-mers with valuable properties, 1. naturallyoccurringxylans structures, isolation procedures and properties. Macromol Rapid Commun 2000;21:542-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3927(20000601)21:9<542::AID-MARC542>30.CO;2-7
  27. Dale T, Hannay I, Bedford MR, Tucker GA, Brameld JM, Parr T. The effects of exogenous xylanase supplementation on the in viVO generation ofxylooligosaccharides and mono-saccharides in broilers fed a wheat-based diet. Br Poult Sci 2020;61:471-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1751805
  28. Mandalari G, Mackie AM, Rigby NM, Wickham MSJ, Mills ENC. Physiological phosphatidylcholine protects bovine B-lactoglobulin from simulated gastrointestinal proteolysis. Mol Nutr Food Res 2009;53:S131-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200800321
  29. Greiner R. Limitations of an in vitro model ofthe poultry digestive tract on the evaluation ofthe catalytic performance ofphytases.JSci Food Agric 2021;101:2519-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10878
  30. Suman SP, Joseph P. Myoglobin chemistry and meat color. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2013;4:79-99. https://doi.org10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182623
  31. Wei Y, QinK, Qin X, SongF XuX. Effects ofdifferent types ofxanthophyl extracted from marigold on pigmentation of yellow-feathered chickens. Anim Biosci2023;36:1853-9.https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0097
  32. Lee C, Kim JH, Kil DY. Comparison of stress biomarkers in laying hens raised under along-term multiple stress condition. Poult Sci 2022;101:101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101868
  33. Ghasemi HA, Ghasemi R, Torki M. Periodic usage oflow-protein methionine-fortified diets in broiler chickens under high ambienttemperature conditions: Effects on performance, slaughter traits, leukocyte profiles and antibody response. IntJ Biometeorol 2014:58:1405-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0741-0
  34. Fatemi M, Toghyani M. Effect oftryptophan supplementation in protein deficient diets on performance, gutdevelopment and immune responses in broiler chickens. Iran J Appl Anim Sci2018:8:101-8.
  35. Nari N, Ghasemi HA, Hajkhodadadi 1, Farahani AK. Intestinal microbial ecology, immune response, stress indicators, and gutmorphoogyofmale broiler chickens fed low-phosphorus diets supplemented with phytase, butyric acid, or saccharo-myces boulardii. LivestSci 2020;234103975. https://doi.org10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103975
  36. CVB. CVB Feed Table 2021: Chemical composition and nutritional values of feedstuffs. Wageningen, Netherlands: CVB;2021.
  37. Englyst H, Wiggins HS, Cummings JH. Determination of the non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods by Gas-Liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 1982;107:307-18. https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9820700307