DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SRXN1 is a novel protective factor against methylmercury‑induced apoptosis in C17.2 mouse neural stem cells

  • Naoya Yamashita (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Yukie Yokoyama (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Ayano Kumagai (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Ryoko Fukushima (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Ryota Yamagata (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University) ;
  • Gi‑Wook Hwang (Laboratory of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.16
  • 심사 : 2024.12.18
  • 발행 : 2025.03.15

초록

Methylmercury is an environmental pollutant that exhibits severe cerebral neurotoxicity and remains a worldwide problem. Motor and mental development disorders have been observed in children born to women who consumed relatively large amounts of methylmercury via contaminated fish during pregnancy. We previously found by RNA-sequencing analysis that treatment of C17.2 mouse neural stem cells with methylmercury induced the expression of SRXN1 (sulfiredoxin-1), a redox regulator. In this study, we examined the effect of methylmercury on SRXN1 expression and the role of SRXN1 in methylmercury-induced cell death. After C17.2 cells were treated with methylmercury, both mRNA and protein expression of SRXN1 increased in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Because the induction of SRXN1 expression by methylmercury was suppressed by pretreatment with a transcription inhibitor, we searched the upstream region of the SRXN1 gene and found a binding sequence for transcription factor 3 (TCF3). Interestingly, the induction of SRXN1 expression by methylmercury was attenuated in cells in which TCF3 expression was suppressed by siRNA compared with control cells. This suggests that TCF3 is involved in the induction of SRXN1 expression by methylmercury. We previously reported that TCF3 overexpression suppressed methylmercury-induced apoptosis; in the present study, we found that SRXN1 overexpression also suppressed methylmercury-induced apoptosis, as assessed by cleaved caspase-3 expression. In summary, our results indicate that SRXN1 induced by TCF3-mediated expression is a novel protective factor against methylmercury-induced apoptosis.

키워드

과제정보

We thank Michal Bell, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

참고문헌

  1. Miyamoto K, Nakanishi H, Moriguchi S et al (2001) Involvement of enhanced sensitivity of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in vulnerability of developing cortical neurons to methylmercury neurotoxicity. Brain Res 901:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02281-8
  2. Fujimura M, Usuki F (2022) Cellular conditions responsible for methylmercury-mediated neurotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci 23:7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137218
  3. Yoshimoto K, Van Anh HT, Yamamoto A et al (2016) Simple analysis of total mercury and methylmercury in seafood using heating vaporization atomic absorption spectrometry. J Toxicol Sci 41:489–500. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.41.489
  4. Eto K (1997) Review article: pathology of minamata disease. Toxicol Pathol 25:614–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/019262339702500612
  5. Tatsuta N, Murata K, Iwai-Shimada M et al (2017) Psychomotor ability in children prenatally exposed to methylmercury: the 18-month follow-up of Tohoku Study of Child Development. Tohoku J Exp Med 242:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.242.1
  6. Tatsuta N, Nakai K, Sakamoto M et al (2018) Methylmercury exposure and developmental outcomes in Tohoku study of child development at 18 months of age. Toxics 6:49. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics6030049
  7. Jacobson JL, Muckle G, Ayotte P et al (2015) Relation of prenatal methylmercury exposure from environmental sources to childhood IQ. Environ Health Perspect 123:827–833. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408554
  8. Hwang GW, Hayashi T, Kita K et al (2007) siRNA-mediated inhibition of phosphatidylinositol glycan Class B (PIGB) confers resistance to methylmercury in HEK293 cells. J Toxicol Sci 32:581–583. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.32.581
  9. Hwang GW, Oh S, Takahashi T et al (2010) siRNA-mediated knockdown of the melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein 2 (MRAP2) gene confers resistance to methylmercury on HEK293 cells. J Toxicol Sci 35:947–950. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.947
  10. Iwai-Shimada M, Takahashi T, Kim M et al (2016) Methylmercury induces the expression of TNF-α selectively in the brain of mice. Sci Rep 6:38294. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38294
  11. Hwang GW, Ryoke K, Takahashi T, Naganuma A (2010) Silencing of the gene for homeobox protein HOXB13 by siRNA confers resistance to methylmercury on HEK293 cells. J Toxicol Sci 35:941–944. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.941
  12. Toyama T, Xu S, Nakano R et al (2020) The nuclear protein HOXB13 enhances methylmercury toxicity by inducing oncostatin M and promoting its binding to TNFR3 in cultured cells. Cells 9:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010045
  13. Toyama T, Xu S, Kanemitsu Y et  al (2023) Methylmercury directly modifes the 105th cysteine residue in oncostatin M to promote binding to tumor necrosis factor receptor 3 and inhibit cell growth. Arch Toxicol 97:1887–1897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03520-5
  14. Yamashita N, Uchiyama M, Yamagata R, Hwang GW (2024) Methylmercury induces apoptosis in mouse C17.2 neural stem cells through the induction of OSGIN1 expression by NRF2. Int J Mol Sci 25:3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073886
  15. Hwang GW, Tobita M, Takahashi T et al (2010) siRNA-mediated AMPKα1 subunit gene PRKAA1 silencing enhances methylmercury toxicity in HEK293 cells. J Toxicol Sci 35:601–604. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.601
  16. Takahashi T, Kim MS, Iwai-Shimada M et al (2019) Induction of chemokine CCL3 by NF-κB reduces methylmercury toxicity in C17.2 mouse neural stem cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 71:103216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.103216
  17. Takahashi T, Kim MS, Iwai-Shimada M et al (2018) Chemokine CCL4 induced in mouse brain has a protective role against methylmercury toxicity. Toxics 6:36. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics6030036
  18. Hwang GW, Ryoke K, Lee JY et al (2011) siRNA-mediated silencing of the gene for heat shock transcription factor 1 causes hypersensitivity to methylmercury in HEK293 cells. J Toxicol Sci 36:851–853. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.36.851
  19. Toyama T, Wang Y, Kim MS et al (2021) Increased expression of TCF3, transcription factor 3, is a defense response against methylmercury toxicity in mouse neuronal C17.2 cells. Toxicol Res 37:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-021-00087-0
  20. Chang TS, Jeong W, Woo HA et al (2004) Characterization of Mammalian sulfredoxin and its reactivation of hyperoxidized peroxiredoxin through reduction of cysteine sulfnic acid in the active site to cysteine. J Biol Chem 279:50994–51001. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M409482200
  21. Lowther WT, Haynes AC (2011) Reduction of cysteine sulfnic acid in eukaryotic, typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxins by sulfredoxin. Antioxid Redox Signal 15:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3564
  22. Watanabe J, Nakamachi T, Ohtaki H et al (2013) Low dose of methylmercury (MeHg) exposure induces caspase mediated-apoptosis in cultured neural progenitor cells. J Toxicol Sci 38:931–935. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.38.931
  23. Franco JL, Posser T, Dunkley PR et al (2009) Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase. Free Radic Biol Med 47:449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.05.013
  24. Sato M, Toyama T, Lee JY et al (2018) Activation of ornithine decarboxylase protects against methylmercury toxicity by increasing putrescine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 356:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2018.08.002
  25. Sato M, Toyama T, Kim MS et al (2020) Increased putrescine levels due to ODC1 overexpression prevents mitochondrial dysfunction-related apoptosis induced by methylmercury. Life Sci 256:118031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118031
  26. Takahashi T, Wang Y, Toyama T et al (2017) Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of the transcription factor TCF3 enhances sensitivity to methylmercury in mouse neural stem cells. Fundam Toxicol Sci 4:41–43. https://doi.org/10.2131/fts.4.41
  27. Soriano FX, Léveillé F, Papadia S et al (2008) Induction of sulfredoxin expression and reduction of peroxiredoxin hyperoxidation by the neuroprotective Nrf2 activator 3H–1,2-dithiole-3-thione. J Neurochem 107:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05648.x
  28. Glauser DA, Brun T, Gauthier BR, Schlegel W (2007) Transcriptional response of pancreatic beta cells to metabolic stimulation: large scale identifcation of immediate-early and secondary response genes. BMC Mol Biol 8:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-54
  29. Soriano FX, Baxter P, Murray LM et al (2009) Transcriptional regulation of the AP-1 and Nrf2 target gene sulfredoxin. Mol Cells 27:279–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-009-0050-y
  30. Toyama T, Sumi D, Shinkai Y et al (2007) Cytoprotective role of Nrf2/Keap1 system in methylmercury toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363:645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.017
  31. Toyama T, Hoshi T, Noguchi T et al (2021) Methylmercury induces neuronal cell death by inducing TNF-α expression through the ASK1/p38 signaling pathway in microglia. Sci Rep 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89210-7
  32. Kim MS, Takahashi T, Lee JY et al (2017) Identifcation of transcription factors activated by methylmercury in mouse brain. Fundam Toxicol Sci 4:37–39. https://doi.org/10.2131/fts.4.37
  33. Huggins GS, Chin MT, Sibinga NES et al (1999) Characterization of the mUBC9-binding sites required for E2A protein degradation. J Biol Chem 274:28690–28696. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.40.28690
  34. Sun L, Trausch-Azar JS, Ciechanover A, Schwartz AL (2007) E2A protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is stagedependent during muscle diferentiation. Oncogene 26:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209793
  35. Hwang GW, Furuchi T, Naganuma A (2002) Ubiquitin-proteasome system is responsible for the protection of yeast and human cells against methylmercury. FASEB J 16:709–711. https://doi.org/10.1096/f.01-0899fje
  36. Takanezawa Y, Nakamura R, Harada R et al (2017) Sequestosome1/p62 protects mouse embryonic fbroblasts against low-dose methylercury-induced cytotoxicity and is involved in clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Sci Rep 7:16735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17112-8
  37. Yuan J, Ofengeim D (2024) A guide to cell death pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 25:379–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-023-00689-6
  38. Sunico CR, Sultan A, Nakamura T et al (2016) Role of sulfredoxin as a peroxiredoxin-2 denitrosylase in human iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E7564–E7571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608784113
  39. Yamagata R, Saito A, Fukushima R et al (2024) Methylmercury exposure at dosage conditions that do not afect growth can impair memory in adolescent mice. Toxicol Res 40:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-024-00239-y