DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technological friction dampers system (TFDS) - Novel base isolation system (TBIS) and hybrid system for steel structures

  • Received : 2024.08.07
  • Accepted : 2025.01.23
  • Published : 2025.04.25

Abstract

This study involves an analytical investigation of the earthquake performance of Technological Friction Damper Systems-TFDS and the novel Technological Base Isolator System-TBIS in steel structures. The earthquake performance of a 5-story steel structure, which is considered within the scope of this study, was analyzed using both the pushover method and the time history analysis method in accordance with the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 TBEC-2018. The pushover analysis method was chosen for retrofitting with the TFDS, while time history analysis methods were selected for the retrofitting study involving TBIS and the hybrid system. 11 scaled earthquake records were utilized for history analysis. It was observed that no damage occurred in the structure after retrofitting with TFDS. Furthermore, FEM analyses also corroborated this finding. On the other hand, when the reference structure was analyzed using the time history analysis method with 11 scaled earthquake records, it was noted that 36% of the ground floor columns did not meet the TBEC 2018 limit conditions. However, damage was prevented when TBIS and TBIS-TFDS-Hybrid were used together. Additionally, it was observed that the TBIS system reduced the roof's relative displacement of the structure by 54%, and the hybrid system reduced it by 61%.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge and express their sincere gratitude to Genser Muhendislik Mimarlik insaat san. ve Tic.Ltd. Sti. For their support with Ansys analysis.

References

  1. ABAQUS (2014), Standard User's Manual,Version AS. 6.14-2 (S. E), Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
  2. Alibabaei Shahraki, M., Kamgar, R. and Heidarzadeh, H. (2023), "Damage-based design of multiple tuned mass dampers to improve the seismic performance of steel frame structures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 173, 108062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108062.
  3. Ansys® (2020), Workbench, Release 2020 R2, Ansys, Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  4. Artar, M. and Carbas, S. (2022), "Optimum sizing design of steel frame structures through maximum energy dissipation of friction dampers under seismic excitations", Struct., 44, 1928-1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.119.
  5. Buckle, I.G. and Mayes, R.L. (1990), "Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance- A world view", Earthq. Spectra, 6(2), 161-201. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585564.
  6. Cao, L. and Li, C. (2019), "Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations", Struct. Control Health Monit., 26(4), e2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2319.
  7. Cao, L. and Li, C. (2022)." A high performance hybrid passive base-isolated system", Struct. Control Health Monit., 29(3), e2887. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2887.
  8. Cao, L., Li, X., Huang, Y., Li, C. and Pan, H. (2025), "High robust eddy current tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters for structures under the ground acceleration", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 188, 109040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109040.
  9. Carpani, B. (2016), "Base isolation from a historical perspective", 16th World Conference on Earthquake (16WCEE 2017), Santiago, Chile, January.
  10. Chen, P., Wang, B., Dai, K. and Li, T. (2022), "Analytical and numerical investigations of base isolation system with negative stiffness devices", Eng. Struct., 268, 114799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114799.
  11. Chen, X. and Xiong, J. (2022), "Seismic resilient design with base isolation device using friction pendulum bearing and viscous damper", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 153, 107073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107073.
  12. Chen, X., de Domenico, D. and Li, C. (2023), "Seismic resilient design of rocking tall bridge piers using inerter-based systems", Eng. Struct., 281, 115819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115819.
  13. Chopra, A.K. (2012), Dynamics Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  14. Computers and Structures Inc. (1995), SAP2000, Integrated Finite Elements Analysis and Design of Structures, Tutorial Manual, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  15. Congru, Y., Tiange, S., Xiaobin, S., Xianglin, G. and Xuwen, X. (2023), "Seismic performance of indoor substation RC frames with combined base isolation techniques", Eng. Struct., 284, 115962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115962.
  16. de Domenico, D., Gandelli, E. and Quaglini, V. (2020a), "Adaptive isolation system combining low-friction sliding pendulum bearings and SMA-based gap dampers", Eng. Struct., 212, 110536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110536.
  17. de Domenico, D., Gandelli, E. and Quaglini, V. (2020b), "Effective base isolation combining low-friction curved surface sliders and hysteretic gap dampers", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 130, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105989.
  18. de Montalk, R.W. (1932), "Shock absorbing or minimizing means for buildings", U.S. Patent No. 1847820, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
  19. Deringöl, A.H. and Güneyisi, E.M. (2021), "Effect of using high damping rubber bearings for seismic isolation of the buildings", Int. J. Steel Struct., 21(5), 1698-1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00530-w.
  20. Dong, B. and Ricles, J.M. (2021), "Simplified seismic design procedure for steel MRF structure with nonlinear viscous dampers", J. Constr. Steel Res., 185, 106857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106857.
  21. Dong, W., Shi, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Y. and Yan, J.B. (2023), "Development of a long-period vertical base isolation device with variable stiffness for steel frame structures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 164, 107638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107638.
  22. Eldin, M.N., Dereje, A.J. and Kim, J. (2020), "Seismic retrofit of RC buildings using self-centering PC frames with frictiondampers", Eng. Struct., 208, 109925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109925.
  23. Filiatrault, A. and Cherry, S. (1987), "Performance evaluation of friction damped braced steel frames under simulated earthquake loads", Earthq. Spectra, 3(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585419.
  24. Forcellini, D. (2022), "The assessment of the interaction between base isolation (BI) technique and soil structure interaction (SSI) effects with 3D numerical simulations", Struct., 45, 1452-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.080.
  25. Girgin, S.C., Göksoy, C., Daş, E. and Mısır, İ.S. (2021), "Seismic performance evaluation of a precast concrete structure with deformation-based limit criterions", J. Struct. Eng. Appl. Mech., 4(3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2021.03140150.
  26. Ho, H.C., Chung, K.F., Liu, X., Xiao, M. and Nethercot, D.A. (2019), "Modelling tensile tests on high strength S690 steel materials undergoing large deformations", Eng. Struct., 192, 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.057.
  27. Jangid, R.S. and Datta, T.K. (1995), "Seismic behaviour of baseisolated buildings: A state-of-the art review", Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Struct. Build., 110(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1995.27599.
  28. Jangid, R.S. and Londhe, Y.B. (1998), "Effectiveness of elliptical rolling rods for base isolation", J. Struct. Eng., 124(4), 469-472. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(469).
  29. Jangid, RS. (1996), "Seismic response of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(11), 1301-1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199611)25:11<1301::AID-EQE618>3.0.CO;2-3.
  30. Jarrahi, H., Asadi, A., Khatibinia, M., Etedali, S. and Paknehad, S. (2022), "Soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames equipped with optimal rotational friction dampers", Struct., 43, 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.118.
  31. Li, C., Chang, K., Cao, L. and Huang, Y. (2021), "Performance of a nonlinear hybrid base isolation system under the ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 143, 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106589.
  32. Li, J.Y., Lu, J. and Zhou, H. (2023), "Reliability analysis of structures with inerter-based isolation layer under stochastic seismic excitations", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 235, 109222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109222.
  33. Liu, X., Ding, Y., Zhang, H., Zhao, H. and Li, A. (2023), "A novel brace-damper system for seismic response suppression of highrise steel frame structures", J. Build. Eng., 72, 106655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106655.
  34. Liu, Y., Wang, H., Qiu, C. and Zhao, X. (2019), "Seismic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy spring in base isolation system of multi-story steel frame", Mater., 12(6), 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060997.
  35. Malhotra, A., Roy, T. and Matsagar, V. (2020), "Effectiveness of friction dampers in seismic and wind response control of connected adjacent steel buildings", Shock Vib., 2020(1), 8304359. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8304359.
  36. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2005), "Viscoelastic damper connected to adjacent structures involving seismic isolation", J. Civil Eng. Manag., 11(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2005.9636362.
  37. Mualla, I. (2000), "Experimental evaluation of new friction damper device", 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January-February.
  38. Naderpour, H., Naji, N., Burkacki, D. and Jankowski, R. (2019), "Seismic response of high-rise buildings equipped with base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers", Appl. Sci., 9(6), 1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061201.
  39. Pall, A.S. and Marsh, C. (1982), "Response of friction damped braced frames", J. Struct. Div., 108(6), 1313-1323. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005968.
  40. Pall, A.S. and Pall, R. (2002), "Performance-based design using pall friction dampers-an economical design solution", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August.
  41. Peer Ground Motion Database (2022), Spectras, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  42. Polikim (2024), Technical Data Sheet for Kestamid Group, Polikim Polymer and Chemical Industry Inc., Kocaeli, Turkiye. 291620f1-ec1f-4449-9206-fc0afe364a90_Kestamid-TeknikDegerler.pdf (ttkobi.gen.tr)
  43. Qahir Darwish, A. and Bhandari, M. (2022), "Seismic response reduction of high-rise steel-concrete composite buildings equipped with base isolation system", Mater. Today Proc., 59, 516-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.560.
  44. Rawat, A. and Matsagar, V. (2022), "Seismic analysis of liquid storage tank using oblate spheroid base isolation system based on rolling friction", Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 147, 104186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.104186.
  45. Sevik, M., Altiok, T.Y. and Demir, A. (2023), "Investigation of the effect of damper location and slip load calculation on the behavior of a RC structure", Earthq. Struct., 24(5), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.24.5.365.
  46. Singh, H. and Kumar Tiwary, A. (2022), "Dynamic analysis of RCC framed structure considering effect of viscous dampers and base isolation", Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.086.
  47. Soni, D.P., Mistry, B.B., Jangid, R.S. and Panchal, V.R. (2011), "Seismic response of the double variable frequency pendulum isolator", Struct. Control Health Monit., 18(4), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.384.
  48. Stiemer, S.F. and Barwig, B.B. (1985), "Seismic base isolation for steel structures", Can. J. Civil Eng., 12(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1139/l85-008.
  49. Suk R., Demir, A., Altiok, T.Y. and Altintas, G. (2024b), "Advancing earthquake resistance: Hybrid retrofitting of RC frames with FRP and TDS", Struct., 66, 106851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106851.
  50. Suk, R. and Altintas, G. (2020), "Behavior of multidirectional friction dampers", J. Vib. Control, 26(21-22), 1969-1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320909978.
  51. Suk, R., Demir, A., Altintas, G. and Altiok, T.Y. (2024a), "Proposal for a novel technological damper system (TDS) for the retrofit of reinforced concrete frame structures", Struct., 60, 105878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105878.
  52. TBEC (2018), Turkish Building Seismic Code, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, Ankara, Türkiye.
  53. Tsai, H.C. (1995), "The effect of tuned-mass dampers on the seismic response of base-isolated structures", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 32(8), 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)00150-U.
  54. Yang, M., Qi, A. and Zhang, J. (2023), "Overturning effects on seismic performance of the hybrid friction-based seismic isolation system", J. Constr. Steel Res., 201, 107716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107716.
  55. Zayas, V.A., Low, S.S. and Mahin, S.A. (1990), "A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation", Earthq. Spectra, 6(2), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585573.
  56. Zhang, C. and Ali, A. (2021), "The advancement of seismic isolation and energy dissipation mechanisms based on friction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 146, 106746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106746.