DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on the Treatment Effect of Stretching and High-frequency Diathermy in Subjects With Gastrocnemius Tightness

  • Beom-Seop Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yixin Wang (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ye-Jin Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Min-Young Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hye-Seon Jeon (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2025.02.11
  • Accepted : 2025.03.12
  • Published : 2025.04.20

Abstract

Background: Ankle flexibility is important for maintaining proper biomechanical function. Static stretching is used to improve flexibility with minimal risk; however, its effects are often temporary. Transfer of energy capacitive and resistive (TECAR) therapy has the potential to enhance muscle flexibility and circulation through deep heat applications. However, comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of TECAR therapy and static stretching are lacking. Objects: This study aimed to compare the effects of static stretching therapy (ST) and combined TECAR and static stretching therapy (T-ST) in subjects with gastrocnemius muscle (GCM) tightness. Methods: Twenty-seven participants with bilateral GCM tightness were enrolled. To administer the ST and T-ST, which were each applied to both legs, the participants stood for 15 minutes on a wedge with a 0°-15° incline, with both feet on the wedge during ST and with TECAR therapy in resistive energy transfer mode applied to only one side of the GCM during T-ST. Muscle stiffness (MyotonPRO), dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), peak torque, and pennation angle (PA) of the GCM were measured before and after the intervention. Normality was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences between the ST and T-ST leg conditions and between pre- and post-intervention changes in the legs were analyzed using paired t-tests. Results: There were no significant differences in any of the measured variables between the legs before the intervention. ST and T-ST legs showed significant improvements in all measured variables after the intervention (p < 0.05). T-ST legs demonstrated a significantly greater increase in DF and a greater decrease in PA than ST legs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: T-ST outperformed ST in reducing PA and increasing DF-ROM by promoting deep tissue relaxation and stimulating metabolic activity. This may lead to reduced pain and greater flexibility compared to ST. Maintaining an optimal PA ensures efficient force transmission during exercise, as evidenced by the observed increase in peak torque.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the "Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project," the Korean Research Foundation for Department of Physical Therapy in the Graduate School of Yonsei University.

References

  1. Vialleron T, Delafontaine A, Ditcharles S, Fourcade P, Yiou E. Effects of stretching exercises on human gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res 2020;9:984. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25570.2
  2. Garrett WE Jr. Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990;22(4):436-43.
  3. Behm DG, Kay AD, Trajano GS, Alizadeh S, Blazevich AJ. Effects of stretching on injury risk reduction and balance. J Clin Exerc Physiol 2021;10(3):106-16. https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106
  4. Warneke K, Wirth K, Keiner M, Lohmann LH, Hillebrecht M, Brinkmann A, et al. Comparison of the effects of long lasting static stretching and hypertrophy training on maximal strength, muscle thickness and flexibility in the plantar flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol 2023;123(8):1773-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05184-6
  5. Shah R, Samuel MW, Son J. Acute and chronic effects of static stretching on neuromuscular properties: a meta-analytical review. Appl Sci 2023;13(21):11979. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111979
  6. Warneke K, Lohmann LH, Behm DG, Wirth K, Keiner M, Schiemann S, et al. Effects of chronic static stretching on maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Sports Med Open 2024;10(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00706-8
  7. Clijsen R, Stoop R, Hohenauer E, Aerenhouts D, Clarys P, Deflorin C, et al. Local heat applications as a treatment of physical and functional parameters in acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders or pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022;103(3):505-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.015
  8. Szabo DA, Neagu N, Teodorescu S, Predescu C, Sopa IS, Panait L. TECAR therapy associated with high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and manual therapy in the treatment of muscle disorders: a literature review on the theorised effects supporting their use. J Clin Med 2022;11(20):6149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206149
  9. Beltrame R, Ronconi G, Ferrara PE, Salgovic L, Vercelli S, Solaro C, et al. Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res 2020;43(4):291-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000435
  10. Kumaran B, Watson T. Thermal build-up, decay and retention responses to local therapeutic application of 448 kHz capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency: a prospective randomised crossover study in healthy adults. Int J Hyperthermia 2015;31(8):883-95. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2015.1092172
  11. Vahdatpour B, Haghighat S, Sadri L, Taghian M, Sadri S. Effects of transfer energy capacitive and resistive on musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Galen Med J 2022;11:e2407. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v11i.2407
  12. Ribeiro S, Henriques B, Cardoso R. The effectiveness of Tecar therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Public Health Health Syst 2018;3(5):77-83.
  13. Yeste-Fabregat M, Baraja-Vegas L, Vicente-Mampel J, Pérez Bermejo M, Bautista González IJ, Barrios C. Acute effects of Tecar therapy on skin temperature, ankle mobility and hyperalgesia in myofascial pain syndrome in professional basketball players: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(16):8756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168756
  14. Barassi G, Mariani C, Supplizi M, Prosperi L, Di Simone E, Marinucci C, et al. Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy: a comparison of operating methods in non-specific chronic low back pain. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022;1375:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2021_692
  15. Choobsaz H, Ghotbi N, Mohamadi P. Comparison between the effects of transfer energy capacitive and resistive therapy and therapeutic ultrasound on hamstring muscle shortness in male athletes: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Galen Med J 2023;12:e2981. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.2981
  16. García-Rueda L, Cabanas-Valdés R, Salgueiro C, Rodríguez Sanz J, Pérez-Bellmunt A, López-de-Celis C. Immediate effects of TECAR therapy on gastrocnemius and quadriceps muscles with spastic hypertonia in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Biomedicines 2023;11(11):2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11112973
  17. Kim J, Park J, Yoon H, Lee J, Jeon H. Immediate effects of high frequency diathermy on muscle architecture and flexibility in subjects with gastrocnemius tightness. Phys Ther Korea 2020;27(2):133-9. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2020.27.2.133
  18. Kim YJ, Park JH, Kim J, Moon GA, Jeon HS. Effect of high-frequency diathermy on hamstring tightness. Phys Ther Korea 2021;28(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2021.28.1.65
  19. Halabchi F, Tavana MM, Seifi V, Mahmoudi Zarandi M. Medial gastrocnemius strain: clinical aspects and algorithmic approach. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2024;38:55. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.55
  20. Oymak Soysal AN, Şimşek Ş, Kaş Özdemir A, Korkmaz MB, BaşAslan Ü. Comparison of the effects of superficial and deep heat agents on hamstring muscle flexibility in healthy individuals. J Clin Pract Res 2023;45(4):327-34. https://doi.org/10.14744/cpr.2023.21939
  21. Nakano J, Yamabayashi C, Scott A, Reid WD. The effect of heat applied with stretch to increase range of motion: a systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 2012;13(3):180-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.11.003
  22. Johanson M, Baer J, Hovermale H, Phouthavong P. Subtalar joint position during gastrocnemius stretching and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train 2008;43(2):172-8. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.172
  23. Chang TT, Li Z, Wang XQ, Zhang ZJ. Stiffness of the gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex between amateur basketball players and the non-athletic general population. Front Physiol 2020;11:606706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.606706
  24. Feng YN, Li YP, Liu CL, Zhang ZJ. Assessing the elastic properties of skeletal muscle and tendon using shearwave ultrasound elastography and MyotonPRO. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):17064. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34719-7
  25. Chang TT, Li Z, Zhu YC, Wang XQ, Zhang ZJ. Effects of selfmyofascial release using a foam roller on the stiffness of the gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Front Physiol 2021;12:718827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.718827
  26. Rowlett CA, Hanney WJ, Pabian PS, McArthur JH, Rothschild CE, Kolber MJ. Efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in comparison to gastrocnemius-soleus stretching for dorsiflexion range of motion: a randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2019;23(2):233-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.02.008
  27. Shams M, Karimi N, Vahedi M, Hakim PK, Zeinalkhani F, Rahnama L. Reliability of muscle stiffness measures in popliteus, medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles by ultrasound shear wave elastography in participants with knee osteoarthritis accompanied by myofascial trigger points. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024;25(1):221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07351-y
  28. Cunnane BT, Sinha U, Malis V, Hernandez RD, Smitaman E, Sinha S. Effect of different ankle joint positions on medial gastrocnemius muscle fiber strains during isometric plantarflexion. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):14986. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41127-z
  29. May S, Locke S, Kingsley M. Reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis and gastrocnemius lateralis. PLoS One 2021;16(9):e0258014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258014
  30. Webber SC, Porter MM. Reliability of ankle isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic strength and power testing in older women. Phys Ther 2010;90(8):1165-75. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090394
  31. Raeisi M, Mohammadi HK, Heshmatipour M, Tarrahi MJ, Taheri N. Effect of transfer energy capacitive and resistive therapy on shoulder pain, disability, and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Chiropr Med 2023;22(2):116-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2022.04.006
  32. Hirata K, Kanehisa H, Miyamoto N. Association between medial gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit architecture and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion with and without consideration of slack angle. PLoS One 2021;16(3):e0248125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248125
  33. Martin-Rodriguez S, Gonzalez-Henriquez JJ, Diaz-Conde JC, Calbet JAL, Sanchis-Moysi J. The relationship between muscle thickness and pennation angle is mediated by fascicle length in the muscles of the lower extremities. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):14847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65100-6
  34. Javidi M, McGowan CP, Lin DC. Estimation of the force-velocity properties of individual muscles from measurement of the combined plantarflexor properties. J Exp Biol 2020;223(Pt 18):jeb219980. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.219980
  35. Yokota Y, Sonoda T, Tashiro Y, Suzuki Y, Kajiwara Y, Zeidan H, et al. Effect of Capacitive and Resistive electric transfer on changes in muscle flexibility and lumbopelvic alignment after fatiguing exercise. J Phys Ther Sci 2018;30(5):719-25. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.719
  36. Piętka T, Knapik K, Sieroń K, Kasprzyk-Kucewicz TD. Temperature response as a contralateral effect of physiotherapy. Polish J Med Phys Eng 2024;30(3)120-6. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0014