Physical Therapy Korea (한국전문물리치료학회지)

Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy (한국전문물리치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Plank Variations and Surface Instability: A Study on Core Muscle Activation in Males and Females

  • Gyubum Choi (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Jinhong Choi (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Bokyeong Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Hanbee Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Sujin Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University)
  • Received : 2025.03.13
  • Accepted : 2025.04.11
  • Published : 2025.04.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: During daily activities, stability is maintained to enhance the function of muscles surrounding the lumbopelvic and hip structures. The core muscles such as the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), and internal oblique (IO) responsible for this stability. One effective static exercise for strengthening these muscles is the plank. Objects: This study aimed to compare abdominal electromyographic activation when an unstable support surface was applied to the upper and lower extremities during a standard and a knee plank. Methods: A total of 30 adults (15 males and 15 females) participated in this study. Surface electromyography electrodes were placed on the RA, EO, and IO muscles. Data were collected under six conditions for males, including two plank postures (standard and knee planks) and three unstable surface conditions (a dynamic balance cushion applied to the upper extremities, lower extremities, or no cushion). Female participants performed only the knee plank. A mixed-effects model with a random intercept was used to analyze muscle activation across plank posture and surface position, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. Results: In males, the standard plank elicited greater muscle activation than the knee plank across all muscles (p < 0.0001). Additionally, applying an unstable support surface to the upper extremities significantly increased muscle activation in both plank postures in EO and IO (p < 0.001). Other muscle, RA, was only affected by the unstable support surface in the standard plank position only. In females, the knee plank with upper limb instability resulted in the highest muscle activation for all muscles. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of surface instability in core muscle engagement. However, future studies should further investigate abdominal muscle activation with a more detailed analysis and the inclusion of a control group to enhance comparative validity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Generative AI (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used solely for proofreading and language refinement. All content, analysis, and interpretations were developed by the authors.

References

  1. Cortell-Tormo JM, García-Jaén M, Chulvi-Medrano I, Hernández-Sánchez S, Lucas-Cuevas ÁG, Tortosa-Martínez J. Influence of scapular position on the core musculature activation in the prone plank exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2017;31(8):2255-62. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001689
  2. Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening 1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(Suppl 1):86-92. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.apmr.2003.12.005
  3. Borghuis J, Hof AL, Lemmink KA. The importance of sensory motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training. Sports Med 2008;38(11):893-916. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838110-00002
  4. Calatayud J, Borreani S, Martin J, Martin F, Flandez J, Colado JC. Core muscle activity in a series of balance exercises with different stability conditions. Gait Posture 2015;42(2):186-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.008
  5. Akuthota V, Ferreiro A, Moore T, Fredericson M. Core stability exercise principles. Curr Sports Med Rep 2008;7(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSMR.0000308663.13278.69
  6. Byrne JM, Bishop NS, Caines AM, Crane KA, Feaver AM, Pearcey GE. Effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2014;28(11):3049-55. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000510
  7. Jeong H, Ha S, Jeong Y, Cho W, Kim J, Won J. Effects of plank exercise on abdominal muscle thickness and disability in subjects with mild chronic low back pain. Phys Ther Korea 2019;26(1):51-9. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.051
  8. Ebben WP, Wurm B, VanderZanden TL, Spadavecchia ML, Durocher JJ, Bickham CT, et al. Kinetic analysis of several variations of push-ups. J Strength Cond Res 2011;25(10):2891-4. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31820c8587
  9. Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, Cowley PM. The use of instability to train the core musculature. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010;35(1):91-108. https://doi.org/10.1139/H09-127
  10. Behm DG, Muehlbauer T, Kibele A, Granacher U. Effects of strength training using unstable surfaces on strength, power and balance performance across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2015;45(12):1645-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0384-x
  11. Vera-Garcia FJ, Grenier SG, McGill SM. Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces. Phys Ther 2000;80(6):564-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.6.564
  12. Topcu H, Arabaci R, Gingor AK, Birinci YZ, Pancar S, Sekir U. Muscle activity of core muscles during plank exercise on different surfaces. Turkish J Sport Exerc 2022;24(3)298-305.
  13. Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Pecson A, Imamura R, Andrews JR. Muscle activation among supine, prone, and side position exercises with and without a Swiss ball. Sports Health 2016;8(4):372-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738116653931
  14. Lee J, Jeong K, Lee H, Shin J, Choi J, Kang S, et al. Comparison of three different surface plank exercises on core muscle activity. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2016;5(1):29-33. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2016.5.1.29
  15. Alizadeh S. Rayner M, Mahmoud MMI, Behm DG. Push-ups VS. bench press differences in repetitions and muscle activation between sexes. J Sports Sci Med 2020;19(2):289-97.
  16. Garner JC, Blackburn T, Weimar W, Campbell B. Comparison of electromyographic activity during eccentrically versus concentrically loaded isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008;18(3):466-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.11.006
  17. Kim MK, Kim SG. Effect of hip abduction angle on trunk muscle activation during plank exercise. J Mens Health 2022;18(2):41.
  18. Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan PB, Burnett AF, Straker LM, Danneels LA. Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients. Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14(3):333-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001
  19. Ko M, Song C. Comparison of the effects of different core exercise on muscle activity and thickness in healthy young adults. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2018;7(2):72-7. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2018.7.2.72
  20. Gupta G, Alok M. Effectiveness of plank exercise in low back pain. Int J Sci Res 2018;9(10):1182-6.
  21. Neumann DA, Kelly ER, Kiefer CL, Martens K, Grosz CM. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017.
  22. Popova N, Petrov G, Mileshkina D, Nesheva I. Progression of the physical activity after delivery by caesarean section. Paper presented at: International Scientific Congress "Applied Sports Sciences"; 2017 Dec 1-2; Sofia, Bulgaria. Sofia: National Sports Academy Vassil Levski, 2017. pp. 469-73.
  23. Kim HK, Kim CY, Kang JH, Kim HD. Influence of the supplementary Ki-hap technique and verbal encouragement on abdominal muscle activation during crunch exercise in healthy subjects: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Korean Soc Phys Med 2016;11(2):53-62. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2016.11.2.53
  24. R Core Team. The manual of R (a language and environment for statistical computing). R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023.
  25. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
  26. Lacquaniti F, Ivanenko YP, Zago M. Development of human locomotion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012;22(5):822-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.03.012
  27. Gouvali MK, Boudolos K. Dynamic and electromyographical analysis in variants of push-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19(1):146-51.