DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhanced System Identification and Finite Element Model Updating for Concrete Random Fields

콘크리트 무작위장에 대한 시스템 식별 및 유한요소모델 업데이트

  • Goh, Wonhui (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chae, Yunbyeong (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 고원희 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 채윤병 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부, 서울대학교 건설환경종합연구소)
  • Received : 2024.11.10
  • Accepted : 2025.02.03
  • Published : 2025.05.01

Abstract

This study proposes an improved method for updating finite element models (FEM) by incorporating the random field characteristics of concrete material properties in reinforced concrete structures. Traditional FEM often assumes homogeneous material properties, which can lead to significant discrepancies between predicted and actual dynamic responses, especially in structures where the Young's modulus (E) of concrete varies due to factors like curing conditions, material composition, and construction methods. We employed a Gaussian random field model and a system identification (SI) technique to address this limitation to optimize sensor placement. We developed an FEM updating method that incorporates the spatial variability of concrete elasticity. This optimization allowed for a more accurate capture of dynamic properties across various structural locations, resulting in FEM updates that reflect concrete's inherent heterogeneity. The proposed method was validated through numerical examples, comparing dynamic response accuracy in models before and after updating. Results demonstrated that error values, measured in terms of maximum value error and normalized root mean squared Error (NRMSE), were significantly reduced in the updated models compared to the pre-update model. This approach effectively addresses the limitations of homogeneous assumptions in FEM.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2022년도 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. RS-2022-00144434).

References

  1. Botte W, Vereechen E, Caspeele R. Random field modelling of spatial variability in concrete–a review. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2023 Aug;1-14.
  2. Kozin F, Natke HG. System identification techniques. Struct Saf. 1986 Aug;3(3-4):269-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(86)90006-8
  3. Liu N, Hu B, Yu ZW. Stochastic finite element method for random temperature in concrete structures. Int J Solids Struct. 2001 Sep;38(38-39):6965-6983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00414-5
  4. Palkovic SD, Kupwade-Patil K, Yip S, Büyüköztürk O. Random field finite element models with cohesive-frictional interactions of a hardened cement paste microstructure. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018 Oct;119:349-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.007
  5. Zhou H, Li J, Spencer Jr BF. Multiscale random fields-based damage modeling and analysis of concrete structures. J Eng Mech. 2019 May;145(7):04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001618
  6. Ou-Yang JY, Liu Y, Yao K, Yang CJ, Niu HF. Model updating of slope stability analysis using 3D conditional random fields. ASCE ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A Civ Eng. 2021 Jul;7(3):04021034. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001150
  7. Chi S, Feng W, Jia Y, Zhang Z. Application of the soil parameter random field in the 3D random finite element analysis of Guanyinyan composite dam. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022 Dec;17:e01329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01329
  8. Fang SE, Perera R, De Roeck G. Damage identification of a reinforced concrete frame by finite element model updating using damage parameterization. J Sound Vib. 2008 June;313(3-5):544-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.11.057
  9. Biswal S, Ramaswamy A. Finite element model updating of concrete structures based on imprecise probability. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017 Sep; 94:165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.02.042
  10. Tao J, Chen J. Experimental study on the spatial variability of concrete by the core test and rebound hammer test. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain. Eng Syst, Part A: Civ Eng. 2023 Aug;9(4):04023029. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1101
  11. Kammer DC. Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods. J Guid Control Dyn. 1996;19(3):729-731. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21688
  12. Li DS, Li HN, Fritzen CP. A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2009; 23(4):1160-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.09.007
  13. Juang JN, Pappa RS. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J Guid Control Dyn. 1985 May;8(5):620-627. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20031