Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Effect of Column Stirrup Spacing Change in KDS 41 20 00 on the Deformation Compatibility of Building Frame Systems

KDS 41 20 00의 기둥 띠철근 간격 변화가 건물골조시스템의 변형의 적합성에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Ga Hee (Hi-Tech Group Structural Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Taewan (Division of Architectural, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 최가희 (하이테크구조엔지니어링 ) ;
  • 김태완 (강원대학교 건축토목환경공학부)
  • Received : 2025.02.10
  • Accepted : 2025.03.14
  • Published : 2025.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There have been meaningful changes in column stirrup spacing by KDS 41 20 00 in 2022, which is to decrease one of the spacing limits from the minimum section dimension to half of the minimum section dimension. Decreased column stirrup spacing increases the seismic shear resistance of columns and the seismic performance of the entire building. Among the effects of the column stirrup spacing change, this study focused on deformation compatibility in the seismic design of building frame system buildings with ordinary shear walls for seismic design category D. The beams and columns in building frame systems shall satisfy moment and shear strength, or deformation capability induced by seismic design displacement for satisfaction of the deformation compatibility. The commentary of KDS 41 17 00 describes that the deformation compatibility check can be ignored if the members in moment frames are upgraded to intermediate section details. The study showed that the deformation compatibility of columns was satisfied without additional consideration if the building frame systems were designed by the decreased column spacing in KDS 41 20 00. However, beams adjacent to walls needed further consideration, such as the recommendation of commentary in the code.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Design code of concrete structure for buildings (KDS 41 20 00); c2022.
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Design code of reinforcement detail of concrete structures (KDS 14 20 50); c2022.
  3. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. A study on establishment of earthquake disaster prevention measures for piloti-type buildings, etc; c2018.
  4. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Seismic design code of buildings (KDS 41 17 00); c2022.
  5. ASCE/SEI 7. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers; c2002.
  6. Ghosh SK, Fanella DA, Liang X. 2003 Seismic and wind design of concrete buildings, International Code Council, Inc; c2005.
  7. Kim T, Min CG. Lateral resisting behavior of reinforced concrete shear wall and flat plate column. 2010 COSEIK Annual Conference; 2010 Apr 8-9; Jeju, Korea.
  8. Kim T, Min CG. Seismic design of shear wall buildings using various lateral resisting systems. Proceedings of EESK Conference; 2010 Mar 19; Chuncheon, Korea: 151-154.
  9. Min CG, Kim T. Seismic design of moment resisting frames coupled with reinforced concrete shear wall system. J Archi Inst Korea. 2010 Oct;26(10):3-10.
  10. Kim T, LaFave JM. Proposed new equivalent lateral force design method for low-rise reinforced concrete wall-frame mixed building systems. Eng Struct. 2017 Dec;152:87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.001
  11. Kim T, Chu Y. Assessment of Korean seismic design practice for low-rise reinforced concrete wall-frame buildings. J Asian Archit Build. 2018 Sep;17(3):473-480. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.473
  12. Chu Y, Kim T. Collapse mechanism of ordinary RC shear wall-frame buildings considering shear failure mode. J Earthq Eng Soc Korea. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2021.25.1.001
  13. ACI 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute; c2019.
  14. Lee HS, Kim T. The efficiency of steel brace strengthening of school buildings according to the failure mode of columns. J Earthq Eng Soc Korea. 2023 Mar;27(2):101-109. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2023.27.2.101
  15. Lee SJ, Kim T. Effect of stirrup spacing of columns and an additional wall other than core walls on the seismic performance of piloti-type buildings. J Earthq Eng Soc Korea. 2024 July;28(4): 171-181. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2024.28.4.171
  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Seismic design code for buildings (KDS 41 17 00); c2019.
  17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Guideline for structural design of piloti-type buildings; c2018.
  18. MIDAS IT (2023) MIDAS GEN User's Manual, ver 940.
  19. Computers and Structures, Inc. Perform-3D, Ver. 6.0.
  20. Lee YG, Kim T. Comparative study of effectiveness of buckling-restrained braces versus steel braces on seismic rehabilitation of school buildings. J Earthq Eng Soc Korea. 2024 Nov;28(6):325-334. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2024.28.6.325
  21. Korea Authority of Land and Infrastructure Safety. Seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation guidelines of existing buildings; c2021.
  22. ASCE/SEI 41. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers; c2023.
  23. FEMA. Example application guide for ASCE/SEI 41-13 seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings with additional commentary for ASCE/SEI 41-17. Federal Emergency Management Agency; c2018.
  24. Choi GH. Seismic performance evaluation of building frame system buildings designed according to KDS 41 20 00. Master's Thesis. Kangwon National University.