The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fractal analysis of mandibular bone structure in individuals with unilateral crossbite

  • Serdar Cik (Republic of Turkiye, Ministry of Health, Public Dental Services) ;
  • Gozde Acikgoz (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Pamukkale University) ;
  • Ali Kiki (Department of Orthodontics, Ataturk University)
  • Received : 2025.01.10
  • Accepted : 2025.04.26
  • Published : 2025.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of unilateral crossbite on the structure of the mandibular bone by using fractal analysis. Methods: This study was conducted using panoramic films obtained retrospectively from 45 individuals with crossbite and 45 individuals with normal occlusion (NO). Fractal measurements were performed on the condyle, corpus, and angulus on both left and right sides of the panoramic films. The films were divided into three groups: cross-side (Cs), normal-side (Ns), and NO. The Cs group was further analyzed on the basis of the number of teeth in the crossbite. Data were analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunnett's T3 multiple-comparison test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The mean condylar fractal dimension (FD) showed no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean angulus FD in the Cs group was significantly higher than that in the NO group (P = 0.006). Similarly, the mean corpus FD in the NO group was significantly lower than those in the Cs and Ns groups (P = 0.003). In the Cs group, comparisons based on the number of teeth in the crossbite showed no significant differences among the condyle, angulus, or corpus regions. Conclusions: Fractal analysis may be an effective approach for detecting variations in mandibular trabecular patterns associated with unilateral crossbites. In cases of unilateral crossbite, the trabecular structure was affected in the angulus and corpus regions.

Keywords

References

  1. Kutin G, Hawes RR. Posterior cross-bites in the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod 1969;56:491-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90210-3
  2. Khda M, Kiliaridis S, Antonarakis GS. Spontaneous correction and new development of posterior crossbite from the deciduous to the mixed dentition. Eur J Orthod 2023;45:266-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjac061
  3. Petrén S, Bondemark L, Söderfeldt B. A systematic review concerning early orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite. Angle Orthod 2003;73:588-96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14580028/
  4. Castelo PM, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR. Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl089
  5. Kilic N, Kiki A, Oktay H. Condylar asymmetry in unilateral posterior crossbite patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:382-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.041
  6. Veli I, Uysal T, Ozer T, Ucar FI, Eruz M. Mandibular asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2011;81:966-74. https://doi.org/10.2319/022011-122.1
  7. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8060014/
  8. Chappard D, Baslé MF, Legrand E, Audran M. Trabecular bone microarchitecture: a review. Morphologie 2008;92:162-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2008.10.003
  9. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:628-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70097-1
  10. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/6.1.25
  11. Gulec M, Tassoker M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Evalua-tion of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis. Oral Radiol 2021;37:36-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00422-5
  12. Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 2011;39:273-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.010
  13. Apolinário AC, Sindeaux R, de Souza Figueiredo PT, Guimarães AT, Acevedo AC, Castro LC, et al. Dental panoramic indices and fractal dimension measurements in osteogenesis imperfecta children under pamidronate treatment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20150400. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150400
  14. Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S. Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:393-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30969642
  15. Samarabandu J, Acharya R, Hausmann E, Allen K. Analysis of bone X-rays using morphological fractals. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993;12:466-70. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.241873
  16. Luo G, Kinney JH, Kaufman JJ, Haupt D, Chiabrera A, Siffert RS. Relationship between plain radiographic patterns and three- dimensional trabecular architecture in the human calcaneus. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980050156
  17. Pothuaud L, Benhamou CL, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Harba R, Levitz P. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:691-9. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.691
  18. Cesur E, Bayrak S, Kursun-Çakmak E, Arslan C, Köklü A, Orhan K. Evaluating the effects of functional orthodontic treatment on mandibular osseous structure using fractal dimension analysis of dental panoramic radiographs. Angle Orthod 2020;90:783-93. https://doi.org/10.2319/012020-39.1
  19. Shrout MK, Hildebolt CF, Potter BJ. The effect of varying the region of interest on calculations of fractal index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:295-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600260
  20. Kayipmaz S, Akçay S, Sezgin ÖS, Çandirli C. Trabecular structural changes in the mandibular condyle caused by degenerative osteoarthritis: a comparative study by cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Oral Radiol 2019;35:51-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0324-1
  21. Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;123:382-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.005
  22. Updike SX, Nowzari H. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res 2008;43:658-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.01056.x
  23. Gumussoy I, Miloglu O, Cankaya E, Bayrakdar IS. Fractal properties of the trabecular pattern of the mandible in chronic renal failure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20150389. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150389
  24. Öztürk Kocak AT, Göller Bulut D. Measurement of the trabecular bone structure of the TMJ region in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: a CBCT fractal analysis study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021;132:352-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.05.005
  25. Lopatienė K, Trumpytė K. Relationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and mandibular asymmetry during late adolescence. Stomatologija 2018;20:90-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30531163/
  26. Ingervall B, Thilander B. Activity of temporal and masseter muscles in children with a lateral forced bite. Angle Orthod 1975;45:249-58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1059337/ 1059337
  27. Alarcón JA, Martín C, Palma JC. Effect of unilateral posterior crossbite on the electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:328-34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.103252
  28. Bresin A, Kiliaridis S, Strid KG. Effect of masticatory function on the internal bone structure in the mandible of the growing rat. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:35-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107107.x
  29. Yasar F, Akgünlü F. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/85149245
  30. Pornprasertsuk S, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Tyndall DA, Yamauchi M. Analysis of fractal dimensions of rat bones from film and digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:179-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600597
  31. Lam PH, Sadowsky C, Omerza F. Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:569-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70282-9
  32. Andrade Ada S, Gameiro GH, Derossi M, Gavião MB. Posterior crossbite and functional changes. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2009;79:380-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/030708-137.1