DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Preoperative Planning, Design, and Execution of the Freestyle Propeller Flap: A Detailed Description and the Case Series

  • Hyung Bae Kim (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Seong John Han (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Joon Pio Hong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyunsuk Peter Suh (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2024.10.06
  • Accepted : 2025.04.16
  • Published : 2025.07.15

Abstract

Background Propeller flap reconstruction has been widely utilized in soft tissue reconstruction due to its versatility and aesthetic outcomes. However, technical challenges and the risk of complications persist. This study aims to provide detailed guidelines on the preoperative planning, intraoperative considerations, and execution of propeller flap surgery to reduce complications. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 20 consecutive patients undergoing propeller flap reconstruction between January 2018 and December 2020. Preoperative planning involved computed tomography (CT) angiography and color Doppler ultrasound. Flap designs prioritized perforator proximity (<3 cm from the defect), vessel axiality, and tissue laxity assessed by skin pinch tests. Surgical techniques including pedicle skeletonization, flap elevation, rotation, and inset were meticulously followed. Results No total flap loss occurred. Partial flap loss was observed in one case (5%). Two flaps (10%) exhibited venous congestion, which resolved following leech therapy without necrosis. Defects were predominantly located on the trunk (80%), with malignancy as the primary cause (55%). Mean follow-up duration was 432 days. Conclusions Careful preoperative planning and adherence to meticulous surgical techniques can significantly reduce complications in propeller flap reconstruction. This structured approach offers a reliable framework, particularly beneficial for surgeons less familiar with propeller flap techniques.

Keywords

References

  1. Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg 1991;44(01):53–54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(91)90179-N
  2. Kedar DJ, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Propeller flaps in the posterior trunk. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):176–183 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714086
  3. Pignatti M, Pinto V, Docherty Skogh AC, et al. How to design and harvest a propeller flap. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):152–160 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714271
  4. Ellabban MA, Awad AI, Hallock GG. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):200–206 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715154
  5. Cordova A, D'Arpa S, Rosatti F, et al. Propeller flaps in the head and neck. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):165–170 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714269
  6. D'Arpa S, Toia F, Pirrello R, Moschella F, Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014:986829 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/986829
  7. D'Arpa S, Cordova A, Pignatti M, Moschella F. Freestyle pedicled perforator flaps: safety, prevention of complications, and management based on 85 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(04):892–906 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c83
  8. Hyakusoku H, Ono S. The history of propeller flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):133–138 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715157
  9. Teo TC. Propeller flaps for reconstruction around the foot and ankle. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021;37(01):22–31 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715656
  10. Lazzeri D, Huemer GM, Nicoli F, et al. Indications, outcomes, and complications of pedicled propeller perforator flaps for upper body defects: a systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40(01):44–50 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.44
  11. Cajozzo M, Jiga LP, Jandali Z, et al. Complications and solutions in propeller flap surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2020;34(03):210–220 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714087
  12. Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012;28(09):595–601 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315786
  13. Paik JM, Pyon JK. Risk factor analysis of freestyle propeller flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33(01):26–31 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586748
  14. Georgescu AV. Propeller perforator flaps in distal lower leg: evolution and clinical applications. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39(02):94–105 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.94
  15. Hong JP, Hur J, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. The use of color duplex ultrasound for local perforator flaps in the extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022;38(03):233–237 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740253
  16. Hallock GG. Doppler sonography and color duplex imaging for planning a perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 2003;30(03):347–357, v–vi https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00036-1
  17. Moore R, Mullner D, Nichols G, Scomacao I, Herrera F. Color Doppler ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography for preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforator imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022;38(07):563–570 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740958
  18. Lee JW, Kim HK, Kim SR, Han YS, Park JH. Preoperative identification of a perforator using computed tomography angiography and metal clip marking in perforator flap reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42(01):78–83 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.78
  19. Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A, et al. Thin and superthin perforator flap elevation based on preoperative planning with ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound. Arch Plast Surg 2020;47(04):365–370 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01179
  20. Min K, Hong JP, Suh HP. Risk factors for partial flap loss in a free flap: a 12-year retrospective study of anterolateral thigh free flaps in 303 lower extremity cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;150(05):1071e–1081e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009646
  21. Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y, et al. Direction of flap rotation in propeller flaps: does it really matter? J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;35(08):549–556 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688408
  22. Ozgentaş HE, Shenaq S, Spira M. Study of the delay phenomenon in the rat TRAM flap model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94(07):1018–1024, discussion 1025–1026 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199412000-00016
  23. Wallace CG, Kao HK, Jeng SF, Wei FC. Free-style flaps: a further step forward for perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(06):e419–e426 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bcf189
  24. Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Brazio PS, Kovach SJ, Rosson GD, Rad AN. A review of propeller flaps for distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction: Is flap loss too high? Microsurgery 2013;33(07):578–586 https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22134
  25. Mohan AT, Sur YJ, Zhu L, et al. The concepts of propeller, perforator, keystone, and other local flaps and their role in the evolution of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138(04):710e–729e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002610
  26. Sisti A, D'Aniello C, Fortezza L, et al. Propeller flaps: a literature review. In Vivo 2016;30(04):351–373
  27. Innocenti M, Menichini G, Baldrighi C, Delcroix L, Vignini L, Tos P. Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472(07):2276–2286 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3537-6
  28. Burnier P, Niddam J, Bosc R, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Indocyanine green applications in plastic surgery: A review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70(06):814–827 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.020
  29. Cha HG, Kang MK, Kim W, Lee JS, Hong JP, Suh HP. Oncologic safety of propeller flap and free flap in reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol 2020;122(04):787–794 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26076