Animal Bioscience

  • 제38권9호
  • /
  • Pages.2008-2020
  • /
  • 2025
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proteomics unveils chemical modifications on protein side chains in raw breast meat of broilers (Gallus gallus) affected with growth-related myopathies

  • Yuwares Malila (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency) ;
  • Sawanya Charoenlappanit (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency) ;
  • Narumon Phaonakrop (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency) ;
  • Yanee Srimarut (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency) ;
  • Sittiruk Roytrakul (National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency)
  • 투고 : 2024.12.16
  • 심사 : 2025.03.26
  • 발행 : 2025.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study aimed to investigate how growth-related myopathies influenced chemical modifications formed on amino acid residues of chicken breast proteins. Methods: Breasts (pectoralis major) of commercial broilers (Gallus gallus) were classified into "normal", White Striping (WS)" and "White Striping + Wooden Breast (WS+WB)" groups (n = 9 per group). The meat was subjected to proteomic analysis using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Differences in abundance of modified sites, including methylated lysine (Lys) and arginine, acetsylated Lys, and oxidized methionine (Met), due to the growth-related myopathies were identified (false discovery rate [FDR]<0.05). Biological functions of the proteins were analyzed. Results: Proteomics revealed 185, 105, and 194 modified sites for methylation, Lys acetylation and Met oxidation, respectively. Of 185, 10 sites from seven proteins (TPM1, MYH, MYH1F, DICER1, RCJMB04_5k17, TPI1, and VIM) showed differential abundance in the methylation (FDR<0.05). Seven acetylated Lys sites from five proteins (TPM1, ADHFE1, SPAG9, PCNT, and RCJMB04_5k17) were differentially expressed. The abundance of those sites in normal samples were lower than those of WS samples (FDR<0.05). As for oxidized Met, differential 62 sites were identified (FDR<0.05). The major Met-oxidized protein was MYH. Met oxidation of 40 sites from 22 proteins was increased in WS samples whereas 19 sites of four proteins (MYL11, MYH, MYH1F, and TNNT2) were increased in WS+WB samples. Only four sites from DICER1, LDHA and LDB3 were found in normal samples (FDR<0.05). Conclusion: The findings shed light on the links between oxidative stress and oxidized Met in the chicken with growth-related myopathies. In addition, methylation and acetylation modifications likely played a role in dynamic cell signaling to maintain cellular activities, particularly metabolism and energy production, against the stress in the affected birds.

키워드

과제정보

We deeply apologize those research groups we could not include in the reference list due to limited reference number required by the publisher.

참고문헌

  1. Barbut S, Mitchell R, Hall P, et al. Review: myopathies in broilers: supply chain approach to provide solutions to challenges related to raising fast growing birds. Poult Sci 2024;103:103801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103801
  2. Malila Y, U-chupaj J, Srimarut Y, et al. Monitoring of white striping and wooden breast cases and impacts on quality of breast meat collected from commercial broilers (Gallus gallus). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1807-17. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0355
  3. Soglia F, Petracci M, Davoli R, Zappaterra M. A critical review of the mechanisms involved in the occurrence of growth-related abnormalities affecting broiler chicken breast muscles. Poult Sci 2021;100:101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101180
  4. Petracci M, Mudalal S, Babini E, Cavani C. Effect of white striping on chemical composition and nutritional value of chicken breast meat. Ital J Anim Sci 2014;13:3138. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3138
  5. Thanatsang KV, Malila Y, Arayamethakorn S, et al. Nutritional properties and oxidative indices of broiler breast meat affected by wooden breast abnormality. Animals 2020;10: 2272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122272
  6. Costa Filho DV, da Rocha TC, de Carvalho JM, et al. Oxidative stability of white striping chicken breasts: effect of cold storage and heat treatments. Poult Sci 2023;102:102826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102826
  7. Estévez M. Protein carbonyls in meat systems: a review. Meat Sci 2011;89:259-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.025
  8. Park D, Xiong YL. Oxidative modification of amino acids in porcine myofibrillar protein isolates exposed to three oxidizing systems. Food Chem 2007;103:607-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.004
  9. Lund MN, Heinonen M, Baron CP, Estévez M. Protein oxidation in muscle foods: a review. Mol Nutr Food Res 2011;55:83-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201000453
  10. Veredas FJ, Cantón FR, Aledo JC. Methionine residues around phosphorylation sites are preferentially oxidized in vivo under stress conditions. Sci Rep 2017;7:40403. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40403
  11. Gao S, Fu Z, Zhang L, et al. Oxidation and side-chain modifications decrease gastrointestinal digestibility and transport of proteins from salted bighead carp fillets after frozen storage. Food Chem 2023;428:136747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136747
  12. Levine RL, Moskovitz J, Stadtman ER. Oxidation of methionine in proteins: roles in antioxidant defense and cellular regulation. IUBMB Life 2000;50:301-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/713803735
  13. Kim G, Weiss SJ, Levine RL. Methionine oxidation and reduction in proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2014;1840:901-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.04.038
  14. Bhave G, Cummings CF, Vanacore RM, et al. Peroxidasin forms sulfilimine chemical bonds using hypohalous acids in tissue genesis. Nat Chem Biol 2012;8:784-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1038
  15. Javaid N, Choi S. Acetylation- and methylation-related epigenetic proteins in the context of their targets. Genes 2017;8:196. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8080196
  16. Alban C, Tardif M, Mininno M, et al. Uncovering the protein lysine and arginine methylation network in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e95512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095512
  17. Su X, Wellen KE, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolic control of methylation and acetylation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2016;30:52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.030
  18. Ali I, Conrad RJ, Verdin E, Ott M. Lysine acetylation goes global: from epigenetics to metabolism and therapeutics. Chem Rev 2018;118:1216-52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00181
  19. Jeong JY, Jung EY, Jeong TC, Yang HS, Kim GD. Analysis of methionine oxidation in myosin isoforms in porcine skeletal muscle by LC-MS/MS analysis. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 2016;36:254-61. https://doi.org/10.5851/KOSFA.2016.36.2.254.
  20. Snijders APL, Hung ML, Wilson SA, Dickman MJ. Analysis of arginine and lysine methylation utilizing peptide separations at neutral pH and electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2010;21:88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.09.010
  21. Lin X, Yang M, Liu X, Cheng Z, Ge F. Characterization of lysine monomethylome and methyltransferase in model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2020;18:289-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2019.04.005
  22. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
  23. Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc 2016;11:2301-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.136
  24. Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 2016;13:731-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3901
  25. Pang Z, Lu Y, Zhou G, et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res 2024;52:W398-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae253
  26. Yin Y, Zhou L, Cai J, Feng F, Xing L, Zhang W. Effect of malondialdehyde on the digestibility of beef myofibrillar protein: potential mechanisms from structure to modification site. Foods 2022;11:2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152176
  27. Bertin J, DiStefano PS. The PYRIN domain: a novel motif found in apoptosis and inflammation proteins. Cell Death Differ 2000;7:1273-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400774
  28. Baldi G, Yen CN, Daughtry MR, et al. Exploring the factors contributing to the high ultimate pH of broiler pectoralis major muscles affected by wooden breast condition. Front Physiol 2020;11:343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00343
  29. Huszar G, Elzinga M. ε-N-methyl lysine in myosin. Nature 1969;223:834-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/223834a0
  30. Phan BC, Cheung P, Miller CJ, Reisler E, Muhlrad A. Extensively methylated myosin subfragment-1: examination of local structure, interactions with nucleotides and actin, and ligand-induced conformational changes. Biochemistry 1994;33:11286-95. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00203a026