DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Molecular-targeted therapy in ameloblastoma: a systematic review

  • Lilies Dwi Sulistyani (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Vera Julia (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Dwi Ariawan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Mohammad Adhitya Latief (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Yudy Ardilla Utomo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Aboy (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Annisa Ghaisani (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Dinda Fadhliana (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Nurul Waqiah Mas'ud (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia)
  • 투고 : 2025.04.30
  • 심사 : 2025.08.20
  • 발행 : 2025.08.20

초록

Background: Ameloblastoma is a benign odontogenic tumor that predominantly occurs in the mandible and is frequently associated with the BRAFV600E mutation, which activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. These mutations indicate potential targets for molecular therapies. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of molecular-targeted therapies, particularly BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib and vemurafenib, in the treatment of ameloblastoma and their effects on clinical outcomes and quality of life. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024627944), a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus identified 4,620 studies, of which eight case reports met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Results: The selected case reports involved patients aged 13 to 85, most of whom had experienced prior surgical recurrences. Treatment with BRAF/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibitors resulted in significant tumor regression and improved quality of life, although some manageable side effects were observed. Conclusion: BRAF inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in the management of ameloblastoma, especially in patients harboring BRAFV600E mutations. These therapies may reduce the necessity for extensive surgical procedures and enhance patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to assess long-term effects on recurrence and quality of life.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buttner R, Gultekin SE, Heydt C, Nogova L, Meemboor S, Kreppel M, et al. Efficiency of B-RAF-/MEK-inhibitors in BRAF mutated ameloblastoma: case report and review of literature. Heliyon 2023;9:e23206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23206
  2. Xu C, Hu Y, Sun Y, Shao Q, Song Y, He J. Curettage combined with decompression for the treatment of ameloblastoma in children: report of two cases. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04126-8
  3. Palanisamy JC, Jenzer AC. Ameloblastoma. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545165/
  4. Fujii S, Ishibashi T, Kokura M, Fujimoto T, Matsumoto S, Shidara S, et al. RAF1-MEK/ERK pathway-dependent ARL4C expression promotes ameloblastoma cell proliferation and osteoclast formation. J Pathol 2022;256:119-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5814
  5. Harianto AA, Hardianto A, Hadikrishna I. Etiology and pathogenesis of unicystic ameloblastoma based on the histopathology examination result analysis. J Indones Dent Assoc 2024;7: 33-9.
  6. Mamat Yusof MN, Ch'ng ES, Radhiah Abdul Rahman N. BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:5593. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225593
  7. Oh KY. Treatment options for advanced ameloblastoma in the era of precision medicine: a brief review. Oral Oncol 2023;146: 106585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106585
  8. Gasparro R, Giordano F, Campana MD, Aliberti A, Landolfo E, Dolce P, et al. The effect of conservative vs. radical treatment of ameloblastoma on recurrence rate and quality of life: an umbrella review. J Clin Med 2024;13:5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175339
  9. Nnko KA, Pima RT, Baraka C. Robi EA, Rwakatema DS, Mre-mi A. Surgical management of mandibular ameloblastoma and immediate reconstruction with iliac crest and costochondrial bone grafts: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024;121:110023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110023
  10. Gonzalez-Gonzalez R, Lopez-Verdin S, Lavalle-Carrasco J, Molina-Frechero N, Isiordia-Espinoza M, Carreon-Burciaga RG, et al. Current concepts in ameloblastoma-targeted therapies in B-raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase V600E mutation: systematic review. World J Clin Oncol 2020;11:31-42. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i1.31
  11. Proietti I, Skroza N, Michelini S, Mambrin A, Balduzzi V, Ber-nardini N, et al. BRAF inhibitors: molecular targeting and immunomodulatory actions. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071823
  12. Broudic-Guibert M, Blay JY, Vazquez L, Evrard A, Karanian M, Taieb S, et al. Persistent response to vemurafenib in metastatic ameloblastoma with BRAF mutation: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2019;13:245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2140-6
  13. Kaye FJ, Ivey AM, Drane WE, Mendenhall WM, Allan RW. Clinical and radiographic response with combined BRAF-targeted therapy in stage 4 ameloblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:378. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju378
  14. Abramson Z, Dayton OL, Drane WE, Mendenhall WM, Kaye FJ. Managing stage 4 ameloblastoma with dual BRAF/MEK inhibition: a case report with 8-year clinical follow-up. Oral Oncol 2022;128:105854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105854
  15. Brunet M, Khalifa E, Italiano A. Enabling precision medicine for rare head and neck tumors: the example of BRAF/MEK targeting in patients with metastatic ameloblastoma Front On-col 2019;9:1204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01204
  16. Tan S, Pollack JR, Kaplan MJ, Colevas AD, West RB. BRAF in- hibitor treatment of primary BRAF-mutant ameloblastoma with pathologic assessment of response. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 122: 05-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.12.016
  17. Fernandes GS, Girardi DM, Bernardes JPG, Fonseca FP, Freg-nani ER. Clinical benefit and radiological response with BRAF inhibitor in a patient with recurrent ameloblastoma harboring V600E mutation. BMC Cancer 2018;18:887. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4802-y
  18. Daws S, Chaiyasate K, Lehal A. Treatment of a BRAF V600E positive ameloblastoma in a pediatric patient with MEK inhibitor monotherapy. FACE 2021; 2: 179-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016211005126
  19. Raemy A, May L, Sala N, Diezi M, Beck-Popovic M, Broome M. Anti-MAPK targeted therapy for ameloblastoma: case report with a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16:2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122174
  20. Ebeling M, Scheurer M, Sakkas A, Pietzka S, Schramm A, Wilde F. BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutated ameloblastoma: systematic review of rare cases in the literature. Med Oncol 2023;40:163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-023-01993-z