Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관·정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관·정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Needs Analysis of the Professional Development of Teacher-librarians for Digital Literacy Education in the School Library Contexts

학교도서관 맥락에서 디지털 리터러시 교육을 위한 사서교사의 교육 요구도 분석

  • 이가영 (백석대학교 특수교육과) ;
  • 차현진 (순천향대학교 기초공통교양학부)
  • Received : 2025.08.16
  • Accepted : 2025.09.15
  • Published : 2025.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As students' digital literacy is emphasized, the demand for digital literacy education linked to school libraries is increasing. This study aims to analyze the professional development needs of teacher-librarians in the school library contexts. To achieve the objective, we derived areas and sub-learning objectives for digital literacy education that teacher-librarians should teach, and the questionnaire consisted of eight sub-areas and 18 learning objectives in three areas. Then, a survey was conducted, and a total of 756 teacher-librarians participated. The survey analysis was conducted using the t-test for importance and performance, the Borich needs calculation formula, and the Locus for Focus model. The results showed that there was a high demand for education in areas such as critical use of digital information and media, use of digital tools, creation using digital tools, reflection and practical participation, and the role of a facilitator for collaboration and active interaction. This professional development needs analysis has implications in that it provides basic data for developing teacher training programs for digital literacy education in school library contexts targeting teacher-librarians.

학생들의 디지털 역량이 강조되면서, 학교도서관을 연계한 디지털 리터러시 교육에 대한 요구가 증대하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 관점에서 학교도서관 사서교사들의 교사 연수 프로그램을 개발하고 지원하기 위해 사서교사의 교육 요구도 분석을 수행하였다. 이를 위해 사서교사가 교육에 적용가능한 디지털 리터러시 교육 항목과 하위 성취 요소를 도출하고, 중요도와 수행도 분석을 위한 설문을 수행하였다. 설문은 총 3개의 영역에서 8개의 하위 요소와 18개의 성취 수행 요소로 구성하였고, 총 756명의 사서교사가 참여하였다. 설문 분석은 중요도와 실행도에 대한 t-검정과 Borich 요구도 산출 공식, 초점의 소재 모형을 활용하여 분석되었다. 결과에서는 디지털 정보·미디어의 비판적 활용, 디지털 도구 활용, 디지털 도구를 활용한 창작, 성찰 및 실천적 참여, 협업 및 적극적 상호작용을 위한 촉진자 역할 등에서 교육 요구가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 교육 요구도 분석은 사서교사를 대상으로 학교도서관에서 디지털 리터러시 교육을 위한 교사 연수 프로그램 개발을 위한 기초자료를 제공하였다는 점에서 시사점을 가진다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 (주)포스비브테크의 연구비 지원으로 수행하였음. 또한, 본 연구는 순천향대학교 학술연구비 지원으로 수행하였음.

References

  1. Cha Hyunjin & Lee Gayoung (2025). Digital literacy education framework: primary and secondary school library contexts. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 56(2), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.56.2.202506.297
  2. Inter-Ministerial Joint Committee (2025, February 12). Digital Competency Education Promotion Plan for All. Available: https://blog.naver.com/moeblog/223758005160
  3. Jung, Hyun Sun (2021). Read, create, share: Development of a digital literacy program for children. Korean Language Education Research, 56(4), 374-412.
  4. Kang, Seul-Gi (2023). Analysis of the Influence of Media Literacy Competence of School Librarian on Educational Competence. Master thesis, Choongang University.
  5. KICE (2008). Subjects to be Displayed(Teacher Librarian Qualification Standards, Evaluation Areas, and Evaluation Content Elements).
  6. Kim, Han Sung, Lee, Hyun Sook, Yoo, Soo Jin, Park, Joo Yeon, Lim, Young Soo, Choi, Mi Ae, Seo, Jung Hee, & Gong, Hyun Ah (2024). 2024 Student Digital Literacy Level Measurement and Development Plan Study. Daegu: KERIS.
  7. Kim, Mi Ok, Kim, Sun Mi, Park, In Hye, Son, Min Young, Sim, Ha Na, Yoon, Hee Sook, & Jung, Kyung Jin (2021). Media Literacy Classes Completed through Themed Activities. Seoul: School Library Journal.
  8. Kim, Su-Hwan, Lee, Hyun-Sook, Kim, Han-Sung, Park, Joo-Yeon, Choi, Mi-Ae, & Han, Na-Ra (2023). A Study on the Improvement of Performance-based Digital Literacy Assessment Tools and the Measurement of Levels for Elementary and Middle School Students in 2023. Daegu, Republic of Korea: Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS).
  9. Lee, Ye Bin (2023). Analysis of the Relative Importance of Digital Literacy Evaluation Indicators for Librarians. Doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University.
  10. Lim, Seong-Eun (2024). Teacher Librarian, Media Literacy Education Competence, Importance-Performance Analysis. Master thesis, CheonBuk National University.
  11. Ministry of Education (2022, August 22). Comprehensive Plan for Nurturing Digital Talent.  Available: https://www.korea.kr/briefing/policyBriefingView.do?newsId=156521928
  12. Ministry of Education (2023). The 4th Basic Plan for the Promotion of School Libraries (2024-2028). Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/
  13. Ministry of Education. (2021, November 24). Key Points of the 2022 Revised National Curriculum (draft). Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  14. Park, Il Joon & Kim, Myo Eun (2022). The Beginning of Education that Changes Children's Future: Digital literacy classroom. Paju: Bookstory.
  15. Park, Joo Hyun, Lee, Myung Kyu, Kim, Ji Hyun, Kang, Bong Sook, Lee, Ji Soo, Sim, Hyo Jung, & Hollister, Jonathan M. (2022). Development of a media literacy education model based on public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 335-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.3.33
  16. Song, Ki Ho (2019). Analysis of librarian teachers' role recognition. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.4.005
  17. ACARA(Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority) (2020). NAP-ICT Literacy Years 6 and 10: Assessment framework 2020. Available: https://nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/resources/napictl-assessment-framework-2020.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  18. ACRL(Association of College & Research Libraries) (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago: American Library Association.
  19. Borich, G. D. (1980). A needs Assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31, 39-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002248718003100310
  20. Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663
  21. Eisenberg, M. & Berkowitz, R. (1992). Information problem-solving: the Big Six Skills approach. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 8, 27-42
  22. Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information literacy: essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit
  23. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019a). IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018. Available: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=ict_literacy
  24. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019b). Preparing for Life in a Digital World: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 Interna tional Rreport. Available: https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-11/ICILS%202019%20Digital%20final%2004112019.pdf
  25. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
  26. Hobbs, R. (2011). Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom. Corwin, A Sage Company.
  27. IFLA(International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) (2015). Media and Information Literacy Recommendations. Available: https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/9716
  28. Joint Information Systems Committee (2014). Developing Students' Digital Literacy. Available: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/full-guide/developing-students-digital-literacy
  29. Korupp, S. & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci030
  30. Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the "digital turn" in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246-271. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364401
  31. Mink, O. G., Shultz, J. M., & Mink, B. P. (1991). Developing and Managing Open Organizations: A Model and Methods for Maximizing Oorganizational Potential. Somerset Consulting Group.
  32. New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  33. OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2018). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
  34. SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy (2011). The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: Core Model for Higher Education. Society of College, National and University Libraries. Available: https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf
  35. UNESCO(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness and Competencies. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002246/224655e.pdf