Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Parameters in the rapid evaluation method in reinforced-concrete structures in the light of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes

  • Ercan Isik (Department of Civil Engineering, Bitlis Eren University)
  • Received : 2024.07.29
  • Accepted : 2025.07.21
  • Published : 2025.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Türkiye was shaken by the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on February 6, 2023, which caused huge structural destruction. Large-scale loss of life and property occurred due to structural damage. These earthquakes, which are neither the first nor the last for Türkiye, have once again demonstrated that structural weaknesses are a factor in damages, as is the case after every earthquake. Many factors affecting the earthquake vulnerability of buildings are taken into account as parameters in the rapid assessment methods used for buildings. Within the scope of this study, the structural parameters specified in the simplified method used to determine regional risk priorities for reinforced-concrete structures in the Principles for Detection Risky Structures updated in 2019 in Türkiye were taken into account. Detailed information is given for each parameter taken into account in this method, and the structural damages that occurred in the Kahramanmaraş earthquake of February 6, 2023 are exemplified. The effect of each parameter in this rapid assessment method on the structural performance to be obtained for a reinforced-concrete building has been numerically obtained. A reduction coefficient was suggested as a result of structural analysis for the lack of building construction year for this method. A reduction coefficient of 15% was suggested for buildings built between 1975 and 1997, 10% for buildings built between 1998 and 2006, and 5% for buildings built between 2007 and 2017. In addition, the effect of concrete grade on structural analysis was evaluated based on different parameters.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The results presented in this scientific paper have been obtained partially through the research activities within the project 2023-1-HR01-KA220-HED-000165929 "Intelligent Methods for Structures, Elements and Materials" [https://im4stem.eu/en/home/] co-funded by the European Union under the program Erasmus+KA220-HED-Cooperation partnerships in higher education

References

  1. Ademović, N., Kalman Šipoš, T. and Hadzima-Nyarko, M. (2020), "Rapid assessment of earthquake risk for Bosnia and Herzegovina"., Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18, 1835-1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00775-1.
  2. Ademović, N., Toholj, M., Radonić, D., Casarin, F., Komesar, S. and Ugarković, K. (2022), "Post-earthquake assessment and strengthening of a cultural-heritage residential masonry building after the 2020 Zagreb earthquake", Build., 12(11), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12112024.
  3. Aggarwal, Y. and Saha, S.K. (2023), "An improved rapid visual screening method for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Indian Himalayan region", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 21(1), 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01537-2.
  4. Altunışık, A.C., Sisman, R., Günaydin, M., Okur, F.Y., Yilmaz, Z., Sunca, F., ... and Taciroglu, E. (2025), "Empirical fragility curves for RC residential buildings after 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquakes", J. Build. Eng., 111, 113446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113446.
  5. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2003), "SeismoStruct-Seismic analysis program by Seismosoft", Technical User Manuel, SeismoStruct, Pavia, Italy.
  6. Apostolaki, S., Riga, E. and Pitilakis, D. (2024), "Rapid damage assessment effectiveness for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Türkiye earthquake sequence", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 111, 104691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104691.
  7. Avcil, F., Işık, E., İzol, R., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., Arslan, M. H., ... and Harirchian, E. (2024), "Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city", Nat. Hazards, 120(3), 2953-2991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06314-1.
  8. Aydogdu, H.H., Demir, C., Kahraman, T. and Ilki, A. (2023), "Evaluation of rapid seismic safety assessment methods on a substandard reinforced concrete building stock in Istanbul", Struct., 56, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104962.
  9. Aynur, S. and Atalay, H.M. (2023), "Comparative analysis of existing reinforced concrete buildings damaged at different levels during past earthquakes using rapid assessment methods", Struct. Eng. Mech., 85(6), 793-808. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.85.6.793
  10. Başgöze, A. and Arzu Güncü. (2023), "Determining the regional disaster risk analysis of buildings in Erzincan", Građevinar, 75(3), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.3436.2021.
  11. Bektaş, N. and Kegyes-Brassai, O. (2022), "Conventional RVS methods for seismic risk assessment for estimating the current situation of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review", Sustainab., 14(5), 2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052583.
  12. Bilgin, H. and Huta, E. (2018), "Earthquake performance assessment of low and mid-rise buildings: Emphasis on URM buildings in Albania", Earthq. Struct., 14(6), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.599.
  13. Bilgin, H., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Işık, E., Ozmen, H.B. and Harirchian, E. (2022), "A comparative study on the seismic provisions of different codes for RC buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 83(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.83.2.195.
  14. Bilgin, H., Leti, M., Shehu, R., Özmen, H.B., Deringol, A.H. and Ormeni, R. (2023), "Reflections from the 2019 Durrës Earthquakes: An earthquake engineering evaluation for masonry typologies", Build., 13(9), 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092227.
  15. Büyüksaraç, A., Isik, E. and Harirchian, E. (2021), "A case study for determination of seismic risk priorities in Van (Eastern Turkey)", Earthq. Struct., 20(4), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.4.445.
  16. Çelebi, E. and Kırtel, O. (2025), "Seismic performance of reinforced concrete framed buildings with ribbed slabs at the affected region by 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 23, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02191-0.
  17. Cetin, K.O., Soylemez, B., Guzel, H. and Cakir, E. (2024), "Soil liquefaction sites following the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequence", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 23(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01875-3.
  18. Demirtaş, Y., Avşar, Ö., Bozer, A. and Dindar, A.A. (2025), "Investigation of code based criteria for soft-story irregularity", Struct., 80, 109668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109668.
  19. Dilsiz, A., Kocaman, İ., Mercimek, Ö., Ismail, S.H., Çelik, A. and Anıl, Ö. (2025), "Field observations and numerical modeling of the collapse mechanism of the Habibi Neccar Mosque during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes", Eng. Fail. Anal., 179, 109767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109767.
  20. Dolce, M. and Goretti, A. (2015), "Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(8), 2241-2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9723-4.
  21. Du, A., Wang, X., Xie, Y. and Dong, Y. (2023), "Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs-An earthquake engineering perspective", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 233, 109104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109104.
  22. Ebadi-Jamkhaneh, M., Kontoni, D.P.N. and Homaioon Ebrahimi, A. (2024), "Assessment of different methods for enhancing progressive collapse resistance of irregular reinforced concrete buildings using pushdown analysis", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 49(10), 13861-13883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08847-4.
  23. Eem, S.H., Yang, B. and Jeon, H. (2018), "Earthquake damage assessment of buildings using opendata in the Pohang and the Gyeongju earthquakes", J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea, 22(3), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.3.121.
  24. EN 1998-3 (2005), Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  25. Erbaş, Y., Mercimek, Ö., Anıl, Ö., Çelik, A., Akkaya, S.T., Kocaman, İ. and Gürbüz, M. (2025), "Design deficiencies, failure modes and recommendations for strengthening in reinforced concrete structures exposed to the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6)", Nat. Hazards, 121(3), 3153-3194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06925-2.
  26. Giannini, R., Paolacci, F., Phan, H.N., Corritore, D. and Quinci, G. (2022), "A novel framework for seismic risk assessment of structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 51(14), 3416-3433. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3729.
  27. Godínez-Domínguez, E.A., Tena-Colunga, A., Pérez-Rocha, L.E., Archundia-Aranda, H.I., Gómez-Bernal, A., Ruiz-Torres, R.P. and Escamilla-Cruz, J.L. (2021), "The September 7, 2017 Tehuantepec, Mexico, earthquake: Damage assessment in masonry structures for housing", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 56, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102123.
  28. Güneş, N. and Ulucan, Z.Ç. (2019), "Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(6), 2989-3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00570-y.
  29. Gusella, L., Adams, B.J., Bitelli, G., Huyck, C.K. and Mognol, A. (2005), "Object-oriented image understanding and post-earthquake damage assessment for the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 21(1), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2098629.
  30. Hadzima-Nyarko, M. and Kalman Sipos, T. (2017), "Insights from existing earthquake loss assessment research in Croatia", Earthq. Struct., 13(4), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.4.365.
  31. Harirchian, E., Hosseini, S.E.A., Jadhav, K., Kumari, V., Rasulzade, S., Işık, E. and Lahmer, T. (2021), "A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings", J. Build. Eng., 43, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102536.
  32. Idris, Y., Cummins, P., Rusydy, I., Muksin, U., Syamsidik, Habibie, M.Y. and Meilianda, E. (2022), "Post-earthquake damage assessment after the 6.5 mw earthquake on December, 7th 2016 in Pidie Jaya, Indonesia", J. Earthq. Eng., 26(1), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1689868.
  33. Isik, E. (2016), "Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Struct., 11(5), 873-885. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.5.873.
  34. Işık, E. (2023), "Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes", Appl. Sci., 13(15), 8937. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158937.
  35. Işık, E., Büyüksaraç, A., Avcil, F., Arkan, E., Aydın, M. and Ulu, A. (2023), "Damage evaluation of masonry buildings during Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes on February 06, 2023", Earthq. Struct., 25(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.25.3.209.
  36. Işık, E., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Radu, D. and Bulajić, B. (2024), "Study on effectiveness of regional risk prioritisation in reinforced concrete structures after earthquakes", Appl. Sci., 14(16), 6992. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166992.
  37. Işık, E., Radu, D., Harirchian, E., Avcil, F., Arkan, E., Büyüksaraç, A. and Hadzima-Nyarko, M. (2025), "Failures in reinforced-concrete columns and proposals for reinforcement solutions: Insights from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes", Build., 15(9), 1535. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091535.
  38. Işik, E., Ulutaş, H. and Büyüksaraç, A. (2023), "The comparison of sectional damages in reinforced-concrete structures and seismic parameters on regional basis; A case study from western Türkiye (Aegean Region)", Earthq. Struct., 24(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.24.1.037.
  39. Kassem, M.M., Beddu, S., Ooi, J.H., Tan, C.G., Mohamad El-Maissi, A. and Mohamed Nazri, F. (2021), "Assessment of seismic building vulnerability using rapid visual screening method through web-based application for Malaysia", Build., 11, 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100485.
  40. Kepenek, E., Korkmaz, K.A. and Gencel, Z. (2023), "A comparative study on rapid seismic risk prioritization for reinforced concrete buildings in Antalya, Türkiye", Comput. Concrete, 31(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2023.31.3.185.
  41. Kocaman, I., Gedik, B. and Okuyucu, D. (2025), "The effects of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on historical masonry minarets in Hatay, Türkiye", Sādhanā, 50, 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-025-02794-y.
  42. Kocaman, İ., Mercimek, Ö., Gürbüz, M., Erbaş, Y. and Anıl, Ö. (2024), "The effect of Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on historical Malatya Yeni Mosque", Eng. Fail. Anal., 161, 108310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108310.
  43. Kontoni, D.P.N. and Farghaly, A.A. (2024), "Seismic control of vertically and horizontally irregular steel high-rise buildings by tuned mass dampers including SSI", Asian J. Civil Eng., 25(2), 1995-2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00890-0.
  44. Kourehpaz, P. and Molina Hutt, C. (2022), "Machine learning for enhanced regional seismic risk assessments", J. Struct. Eng., 148(9), 04022126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003421.
  45. Lagomarsino, S. (2012), "Damage assessment of churches after L'Aquila earthquake (2009)", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10, 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9307-x.
  46. Liberotti, R., Cluni, F. and Gusella, V. (2020), "Vulnerability and seismic improvement of architectural heritage: The case of Palazzo Murena", Earthq. Struct., 18(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.321.
  47. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, W., Lin, Y., Su, F., Cui, J., ... and Gross, L. (2023), "Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment at the urban scale using support vector machine and GIScience technology: A case study of the Lixia District in Jinan City, China", Geomat. Natur. Haz. Risk, 14(1), 2173663. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2173663.
  48. Lulić, L., Ožić, K., Kišiček, T., Hafner, I. and Stepinac, M. (2021), "Post-earthquake damage assessment—Case study of the educational building after the Zagreb earthquake", Sustainab., 13(11), 6353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116353
  49. Morfidis, K., Stefanidou, S. and Markogiannaki, O. (2023), "A rapid seismic damage assessment (RASDA) Tool for RC buildings based on an artificial ıntelligence algorithm", Appl. Sci., 13(8), 5100. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085100.
  50. Moseley, V.J., Dritsos, S.E. and Kolaksis, D.L. (2007), "Pre-earthquake fuzzy logic and neural network based rapid visual screening of buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech, 27(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.27.1.077.
  51. Nanda, R.P. and Majhi, D.R. (2013), "Review on rapid seismic vulnerability assessment for bulk of buildings", J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. A, 94, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-013-0048-5.
  52. Nanda, R.P., Damarla, R. and Nayak, K.A. (2022), "Android application of rapid visual screening for buildings in Indian context", Struct., 46, 1823-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.140.
  53. Nanda, R.P., Rithwez, D. and Nayak, K.A. (2025), "Seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of buildings using mobile technology", Earthq. Struct., 29(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2025.29.1.041.
  54. Nemutlu, O.F., Balun, B. and Sari, A. (2021), "Damage assessment of buildings after 24 January 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake", Earthq. Struct., 20(3), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.325.
  55. Nemutlu, Ö.F., Sari, A. and Balun, B. (2023), "A Novel approach to seismic vulnerability assessment of existing residential reinforced concrete buildings stock: A case study for bingöl, Turkey", Iran. J. Sci. Tech. Transac. Civil Eng., 47(6), 3609-3625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01206-7.
  56. Oyguc, R., Toros, C. and Abdelnaby, A.E. (2018), "Seismic behavior of irregular reinforced-concrete structures under multiple earthquake excitations", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 104, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.10.002.
  57. PDRB-2019 (2019), The Principles of Determining Risky Buildings, RG-16/2/2019-30688, Türkiye Ministry of Environment and Urbanization Ankara, Ankara, Türkiye.
  58. Pinto, P.E. and Franchin, P. (2011), "Eurocode 8-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings", Proceedings of the Eurocode 8 Background and Applications, Dissemination of Information for Training, Lisbon, Portugal, February.
  59. Preciado, A., Ramirez-Gaytan, A., Salido-Ruiz, R., Caro-Becerra, J.L. and Lujan-Godinez, R. (2015), "Earthquake risk assessment methods of unreinforced masonry structures: Hazard and vulnerability", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 719-733. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.719.
  60. Sagbas, G., Sheikhi Garjan, R., Sarikaya, K. and Deniz, D. (2024), "Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 22(1), 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01741-8.
  61. Saito, K., Spence, R.J., Going, C. and Markus, M. (2004), "Using high-resolution satellite images for post-earthquake building damage assessment: A study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 20(1), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1650865.
  62. Sanrı Karapınar, I., Özbay, A.E.Ö. and Ünen, H.C. (2021), "GIS-based assessment of seismic vulnerability ınformation of old masonry buildings using a mobile data validation system", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 35(3), 04021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000157.
  63. SeismoSoft (2024), SeismoStruct 2024—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, SeismoSoft, Pavia, Italy. http://www.seismosoft.com
  64. Shakya, M., Kawan, C.K., Gaire, A.K. and Duwal, S. (2021), "Post-earthquake damage assessment of traditional masonry buildings: A case study of Bhaktapur municipality following 2015 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake", Eng. Fail. Anal., 123, 105277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105277.
  65. Villalobos, E., Sim, C., Smith-Pardo, J.P., Rojas, P., Pujol, S. and Kreger, M.E. (2018), "The 16 April 2016 Ecuador earthquake damage assessment survey", Earthq. Spectra, 34(3), 1201-1217. https://doi.org/10.1193/060217EQS106M.
  66. Vuran, E., Serhatoğlu, C., Timurağaoğlu, M.Ö., Smyrou, E., Bal, İ.E. and Livaoğlu, R. (2024), "Damage observations of RC buildings from 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence and discussion on the seismic code regulations", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 23(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01843-3.
  67. Wang, X., Demartino, C., Narazaki, Y., Monti, G. and Spencer Jr, B.F. (2023), "Rapid seismic risk assessment of bridges using UAV aerial photogrammetry", Eng. Struct., 279, 115589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115589.
  68. Yuzbasi, J. (2024), "Post-earthquake damage assessment: Field observations and recent developments with recommendations from the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Türkiye on February 6th, 2023 (Pazarcık M7. 8 and Elbistan M7. 6)", J. Earthq. Eng., 2024, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2024.2353864.
  69. Yüzbaşı, J. (2025), "Progressive collapse analysis of reinforced concrete building structures", Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 1204-1219. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1665236.
  70. Zhang, H., Cheng, X., Li, Y., He, D. and Du, X. (2023), "Rapid seismic damage state assessment of RC frames using machine learning methods", J. Build. Eng., 65, 105797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105797.