Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage detection for shear structure based on substructure approach and dynamic photogrammetry

  • Jun Luo (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chenming Gou (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Yuan Hu (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Liping Wang (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2023.12.21
  • Accepted : 2025.09.06
  • Published : 2025.11.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a new damage detection method for shear structure based on substructure method and dynamic photogrammetry is proposed. The presented substructure method can identify the damage in shear structure using the absolute acceleration responses of structure measured by acceleration sensors. However, because of the iterative measurement of each substructure, a considerable amount of sensor installation and cabling work are still needed to be done and it would be difficulty or dangerous to install sensors and wiring on some parts of structure. Fortunately, as a non-contact measurement method, the dynamic photogrammetry can provide displacement response of measurement points conveniently and quickly. In order to reduce the impact of camera movement or the difficulty in selecting external reference points, the relative displacement responses are adopted in this paper. Therefore, the substructure algorithm and damage indices corresponding to relative displacement responses are need to be studied. In this paper, the adopted substructure algorithm and the relative displacement responses are introduced. And then, the ARMAX model (i.e., autoregressive moving average with extra input model) of each substructure is used to construct the damage indices using the relative displacements. The derivation of the relationship between the relative displacements of each substructure is also a novelty of this paper. Finally, the dynamic photogrammetry is introduced to obtain the relative displacement responses of each substructure. Based on the proposed damage indices and dynamic photogrammetry, the new damage detection method for shear structure is established. The proposed method is verified using a six-degree-of-freedom system and a laboratory plane frame. The results show that the proposed method can effectively identify the damage in shear structure.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. CSTB2023NSCQ-LZX0051), the Special Funding Project of Chongqing Postdoctoral Research Project (Grant No. 2022CQBSHTB3071), the Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Grant No. ckrc2019033).

References

  1. Amiri, G.G., Dehcheshmeh, M.M. and Hosseinzadeh, A.Z. (2020), "Feasibility study on model-based damage detection in shear frames using pseudo modal strain energy", Smart Struct. Syst., 25(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.1.047.
  2. An, Y., Zhong, Y., Tan, Y. and Ou, J. (2017), "Experimental and numerical studies on a test method for damage diagnosis of stay cables", Adv. Struct. Eng., 20(2), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216659927.
  3. Bornn, L., Farrar, C.R. and Park, G. (2010), "Damage detection in initially nonlinear systems", Int. J. Eng. Sci., 48, 909-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.05.011.
  4. Do, N.T. and Gül, M. (2020), "A time series based damage detection method for obtaining separate mass and stiffness damage features of shear-type structures", Eng. Struct., 208, 109914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109914.
  5. Do, N.T. and Gül, M. (2020), "Structural damage detection under multiple stiffness and mass changes using time series models and adaptive zero‐phase component analysis", Struct. Control Health Monit., 27(8), e2577. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2577.
  6. Do, N.T., Mei, Q. and Gul, M. (2019), "Damage assessment of shear-type structures under varying mass effects", Struct. Monit. Mainten., 6(3), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2019.6.3.237.
  7. Figueiredo, E., Figueiras, J., Park, G., Farrar, C.R. and Worden, K. (2011), "Influence of the autoregressive model order on damage detection", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 26(3), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00685.x.
  8. Ghannadi, P. and Kourehli, S.S. (2019), "Model updating and damage detection in multi-story shear frames using salp swarm algorithm", Earthq. Struct., 17(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.1.063.
  9. Gislason, G.P., Mei, Q. and Gül, M. (2019), "Rapid and automated damage detection in buildings through ARMAX analysis of wind induced vibrations", Front. Built Environ., 5, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00016.
  10. Gul, M. and Catbas, F.N. (2011), "Damage assessment with ambient vibration data using a novel time series analysis methodology", J. Struct. Eng., 137(12), 1518-1526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000366.
  11. Gul, M. and Catbas, F.N. (2011), "Structural health monitoring and damage assessment using a novel time series analysis methodology with sensor clustering", J. Sound Vib., 330(6), 1196-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.09.024.
  12. Guo, H.Y. and Wang, Z.H. (2020), "Experimental study of transmission tower damage detection using time series model", IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 711, 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/711/1/012069.
  13. Hou, R., Xia, Y. and Zhou, X. (2018), "Structural damage detection based on L(1) regularization using natural frequencies and mode shapes", Struct. Control Health Monit., 25(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2107.
  14. Huang, Z., Liu, G., Todd, M. and Mao, Z. (2013), "Damage detection using vector auto-regressive models", SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 2013, San Diego, CA, USA, April.
  15. Kim, H. and Melhem, H. (2003), "Fourier and wavelet analyses for fatigue assessment of concrete beams", Experiment. Mech., 43(2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410494.
  16. Lakshmi, K. and Rama Mohan Rao, A. (2016) "Structural damage detection using ARMAX time series models and cepstral distances", Sādhanā, 41(9), 1081-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0534-3.
  17. Lu, Y. and Gao, F. (2005), "A novel time-domain auto-regressive model for structural damage diagnosis", J. Sound Vib., 283(3), 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.030.
  18. Luo, J., Liu, G. and Huang, Z. (2017), "Damage detection for shear frame structure based on the substructure ARMAX model", Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/J. Vib. Measure. Diag., 37(2), 294-300. https://doi.org/10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2017.02.014.
  19. Mei, Q. and Gül, M. (2015), "Novel sensor clustering-based approach for simultaneous detection of stiffness and mass changes using output-only data", J. Struct. Eng., 141(10), 04014237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001218.
  20. Mei, Q. and Gül, M. (2016), "A fixed-order time series model for damage detection and localization", J. Civil Struct. Health Monit., 6(5), 763-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0196-1.
  21. Meixedo, A., Santos, J., Ribeiro, D., Calçada, R. and Todd, M. (2021), "Damage detection in railway bridges using traffic-induced dynamic responses", Eng. Struct., 238, 112189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112189.
  22. Melhem, H. and Kim, H. (2003), "Damage detection in concrete by fourier and wavelet analyses", J. Eng. Mech., 129(5), 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:5(571).
  23. Mosavi, A.A., Dickey, D., Seracino, R. and Rizkalla, S. (2012), "Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 26(1), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.009.
  24. Niu, Z. (2021), "Two-step structural damage detection method for shear frame structures using FRF and Neumann series expansion", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 149, 107185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107185.
  25. Noh, H.Y., Nair, K.K., Kiremidjian, A.S. and Loh, C.H. (2009), "Application of time series based damage detection algorithms to the benchmark experiment at the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taipei, Taiwan", Smart Struct. Syst., 5(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2009.5.1.095.
  26. Shah, A., Vesmawala, G. and Meruane, V. (2022), "Damage detection of multistory shear buildings using partial modal data", Earthq. Struct., 23(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.23.1.001.
  27. Staszewski, W.J. (1998), "Structural and mechanical damage detection using wavelets", The Shock Vib. Digest, 30(6), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000602.
  28. Taha, M.R., Noureldin, A., Lucero, J.L. and Baca, T.J. (2006), "Wavelet transform for structural health monitoring: A compendium of uses and features", Struct. Health Monit., 5(3), 267-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921706067741.
  29. Tao, D., Ma, Q. and Li, S. (2018), "Seismic damage detection of moment resisting frame structures using time-frequency features", Shock Vib., 2018(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1086540.
  30. Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Tian, Y. and Dong, M. (2017), "Research on tower crane structure damage detection based on ARX model", 2017 IEEE 2nd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chongqing, China, March.
  31. Yan, A.M., De Boe, P. and Golinval, J.C. (2006), "Structural damage diagnosis based on stochastic subspace identification, Kalman model, and principal component analysis", Mech. Indust., 7(4), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2006050.
  32. Yao, R. and Pakzad, S.N. (2012), "Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 13, 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.02.014.