DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes for body size and reproductive traits in Hu sheep

  • Mao Li (College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Xin Xiang (College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Wei Gao (College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Liran Zhao (College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Zhengguang Wang (College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Kui Li (Zhejiang Provincial Animal Husbandry Technology Extension and Breeding Livestock and Poultry Monitoring Station)
  • Received : 2025.09.26
  • Accepted : 2025.10.29
  • Published : 2026.05.01

Abstract

Objective: Larger body size and enhanced reproductive performance are correlated with increased profitability for sheep farmers. Hu sheep have smaller statures compared to other meat sheep breeds, necessitating improvement. The molecular mechanisms underlying the high fecundity of Hu sheep remain unclear. Body size and reproductive traits are economically important traits in Hu sheep production, necessitating further research. Methods: We conducted direct measurements of the body size traits, including body weight, body height and length, chest circumference and cannon bone circumference, for 558 Hu sheep. Additionally, we statistically recorded their reproductive traits, specifically litter size and teat number. Candidate genes for these traits were identified using a mixed linear model in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). The significant threshold for single nucleotide polymorphism was determined using a 1,000 permutation test. Subsequently, functional annotations were conducted on the candidate genes. Results: We identified CHST3 as a key candidate gene affecting the body size, along with SCMH1 and BAZ2B as key candidate genes influencing reproductive traits in Hu sheep. CHST3 affected multiple body size traits and was highly expressed in the muscle tissues of Hu sheep. The SCMH1 and BAZ2B were significantly annotated by GWAS and selection signature, and they were highly expressed in the reproductive system of Hu sheep. Furthermore, through a phenome-wide association study in humans, we found that these key candidate genes were significantly associated with similar traits in human population. Conclusion: This represents the initial evidence linking these genes to body size and fecundity in Hu sheep. These findings provide genetic markers for selective breeding, and contribute to the selection process for high-quality breeding sheep.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Province Agricultural Major Technology Collaborative Promotion Project (2025ZDXT15), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32573211), Zhejiang Team Technology Ambassador Project (Tongxiang).

References

  1. Lin C, Li F, Zhang X, et al. Expression and polymorphisms of CD8B gene and its associations with body weight and size traits in sheep. Anim Biotechnol 2023;34:1214-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.2016432
  2. Qiu Z, Cai W, Liu Q, et al. Unravelling novel and pleiotropic genes for cannon bone circumference and bone mineral density in Yorkshire pigs. J Anim Sci 2024;102:skae036. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae036
  3. Pasandideh M, Gholizadeh M, Rahimi-Mianji G. Identification of two novel SNPs affecting lambing traits in sheep by using a 50K SNP-chip. Small Rumin Res 2020;191:106193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106193
  4. Zhao Y, Pu Y, Liang B, et al. A study using single-locus and multi-locus genome-wide association study to identify genes associated with teat number in Hu sheep. Anim Genet 2022;53:203-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13169
  5. Pendergrass SA, Brown-Gentry K, Dudek S, et al. Phenome-wide association study (phewas) for detection of pleiotropy within the population architecture using genomics and epidemiology (page) network. PLOS Genet 2013;9:e1003087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003087
  6. Huang JY, Labrecque JA. From GWAS to PheWAS: the search for causality in big data. Lancet Digit Health 2019;1:E101-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30059-7
  7. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. Plink: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81:559-75. https://doi.org/10.1086/519795
  8. Yin L, Zhang H, Tang Z, et al. HIBLUP: an integration of statistical models on the BLUP framework for efficient genetic evaluation using big genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;51:3501-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad074
  9. Kassahun D, Taye M, Kebede D, et al. Phenotypic and genetic parameter estimates for early growth, growth rate and growth efficiency-related traits of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia. Vet Med Sci 2022;8:387-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.628
  10. Yin L, Zhang H, Tang Z, et al. rMVP: a memory-efficient, visualization-enhanced, and parallel-accelerated tool for genome-wide association study. Genom Proteom Bioinform 2021;19:619-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.10.007
  11. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 2006;38:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1702
  12. Turner SD. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. J Open Source Softw 2018;3:731. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00731
  13. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. Annovar: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:e164. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq603
  14. Fonseca PAS, Suárez-Vega A, Marras G, Cánovas Á. Gallo: an R package for genomic annotation and integration of multiple data sources in livestock for positional candidate loci. GigaScience 2020;9:giaa149. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa149
  15. Kuhn RM, Haussler D, Kent WJ. The UCSC genome browser and associated tools. Brief Bioinform 2013;14:144-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs038
  16. Jin W, Zhu Q, Yang Y, et al. Animal-APAdb: a comprehensive animal alternative polyadenylation database. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49:D47-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa778
  17. Jin W, Jiang G, Yang Y, et al. Animal-eRNAdb: a comprehensive animal enhancer RNA database. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D46-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab832
  18. Wang Y, Huang Y, Zhen Y, et al. De novo transcriptome assembly database for 100 tissues from each of seven species of domestic herbivore. Sci Data 2024;11:488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03338-5
  19. Watanabe K, Stringer S, Frei O, et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat Genet 2019;51:1339-48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0481-0
  20. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2156-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
  21. Biscarini F, Cozzi P, Gaspa G, Marras G. detectRUNS: detect runs of homozygosity and runs of heterozygosity in diploid genomes [Internet]. The R Project for Statistical Computing; 2019 [cited 2025 Aug 20]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web//packages//detectRUNS/vignettes/detectRUNS.vignette.html
  22. Szpiech ZA, Hernandez RD. Selscan: an efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 2014;31:2824-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu211
  23. Wang W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. Heritability and recursive influence of host genetics on the rumen microbiota drive body weight variance in male Hu sheep lambs. Microbiome 2023;11:197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01642-7
  24. Favara DM, Zois CE, Haider S, et al. ADGRL4/ELTD1 silencing in endothelial cells induces ACLY and SLC25A1 and alters the cellular metabolic profile. Metabolites 2019;9:287. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9120287
  25. Miao X, Luo Q, Zhao H, Qin X. Comparative analysis of alternative splicing events in skeletal muscle of different sheep. Heliyon 2023;9:e22118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22118
  26. Rao-Bhatia A, Zhu M, Yin WC, et al. Hedgehog-activated Fat4 and PCP pathways mediate mesenchymal cell clustering and villus formation in gut development. Dev Cell 2020;52:647-58.E6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.003
  27. Zhang X, Liu J, Liang X, et al. History and progression of fat cadherins in health and disease. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:7337-43. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S111176
  28. Taylor L, Wankell M, Saxena P, McFarlane C, Hebbard L. Cell adhesion an important determinant of myogenesis and satellite cell activity. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2022;1869:119170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119170
  29. Luo Y, Li J, Li X, et al. The ARK2N–CK2 complex initiates transcription-coupled repair through enhancing the interaction of CSB with lesion-stalled RNAPII. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2024;121:e2404383121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2404383121
  30. Du M, Stitzinger SH, Spille JH, et al. Direct observation of a condensate effect on super-enhancer controlled gene bursting. Cell 2024;187:331-44.E17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.005
  31. Mitschka S, Mayr C. Context-specific regulation and function of mRNA alternative polyadenylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2022;23:779-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00507-5
  32. Guan Y, Sun C, Zou F, et al. Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 3 (CHST3) overexpression promotes cartilage endplate-derived stem cells (CESCs) to regulate molecular mechanisms related to repair of intervertebral disc degeneration by rat nucleus pulposus. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25:6006-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16440
  33. Begolli G, Marković I, Knežević J, Debeljak Ž. Carbohydrate sulfotransferases: a review of emerging diagnostic and prognostic applications. Biochem Med 2023;33:030503. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2023.030503
  34. Nestorov P, Hotz HR, Liu Z, Peters AHFM. Dynamic expression of chromatin modifiers during developmental transitions in mouse preimplantation embryos. Sci Rep 2015;5:14347. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14347
  35. Pei YF, Liu L, Liu TL, et al. Joint association analysis identified 18 new loci for bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 2019;34:1086-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3681
  36. Reshetnikova Y, Churnosova M, Stepanov V, et al. Maternal age at menarche gene polymorphisms are associated with offspring birth weight. Life 2023;13:1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071525
  37. Arumugam K, Shin W, Schiavone V, et al. The master regulator protein BAZ2B can reprogram human hematopoietic lineage-committed progenitors into a multipotent state. Cell Rep 2020;33:108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108474
  38. Arnold N, Girke T, Sureshchandra S, Messaoudi I. Acute simian varicella virus infection causes robust and sustained changes in gene expression in the sensory ganglia. J Virol 2016;90:10823-43. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01272-16
  39. Kizilaslan M, Arzik Y, White SN, Piel LMW, Cinar MU. Genetic parameters and genomic regions underlying growth and linear type traits in Akkaraman sheep. Genes 2022;13:1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081414
  40. Khalkhali-Evrigh R, Hedayat N, Seyedsharifi R, Shakouri M, Ponnampalam EN. Genomic evidence of improved fertility and adaptation in Iranian domestic sheep attributed to introgression from Asiatic Mouflon and urial. Sci Rep 2025;15:1185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85756-y