DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal of a Graduated Texture-Code System for Canine Feeding Management -Based on an Analysis of the Limitations of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act and Empirical Surveys-

반려견의 섭식 관리를 위한 단계별 물성 가이드라인(Texture-Code) 제안 -「사료관리법」의 한계 분석과 실태 조사를 바탕으로-

  • Sung-Yeon Park (Department of Applied Animmal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Seon-II Kim (Department of Applied Animmal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jeong-Hyeon Jang (Department of Applied Animmal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Sung-Jin Lee (Department of Applied Animmal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 박성연 (강원대학교 동물응용과학과 ) ;
  • 김선일 (강원대학교 동물응용과학과 ) ;
  • 장정현 (강원대학교 동물응용과학과 ) ;
  • 이성진 (강원대학교 동물응용과학과 )
  • Received : 2026.01.27
  • Accepted : 2026.03.16
  • Published : 2026.03.31

Abstract

This study aims to address the limitations of the current pet food management system under the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act, which still views pet food as a means of livestock production despite the qualitative advancement of the market driven by Pet Humanization. Through a comparative analysis with Korean Industrial Standards for senior-friendly foods (KS H 4897) and relevant legal frameworks, the study identified institutional gaps in pet food texture standardization. A survey of 71 dog owners revealed that while 97.0% consider texture a key factor in purchasing, 54.0% experience confusion due to inconsistent marketing terms across manufacturers. Furthermore, empirical evidence of feeding safety issues, such as dental or gingival injuries (15.0%) and choking or coughing during feeding (46.0%), underscored the necessity for quantitative indicators. Based on these findings, this study proposed the "Canine Texture-Code," a five-stage quantitative framework ranging from liquid/puree to high-hardness food, incorporating veterinary evidence such as esophageal anatomy and bite force by body size. This research holds academic and institutional significance by expanding the quality control paradigm from nutrient-focused standards to physical feeding safety, providing a fundamental basis for establishing an advanced pet food management system that reflects the evolving social status of companion animals.

본 논문은 펫 휴머니제이션 현상으로 펫푸드 시장이 질적으로 고도화되었음에도, 불구하고, 여전히 「사료관리법」 상 축산 생산 수단적 관점에 머물러 있는 현행 관리 체계의 한계를 조명하고 실증적인 물성 표준화 방안을 제시하고자 수행되었다. 우선 KS H 4897 및 법정 관리 체계와의 비교·분석을 통해 펫푸드 물성 규격화의 제도적 미비점을 규명하였다. 또한, 반려견 보호자 71명을 대상으로 시행한 설문조사 결과, 응답자의 97.0%가 제품 구매 시 물성을 주요하게 고려하나 54.0%는 제조사별 다른 마케팅 용어로 인해 선택의 어려움을 겪고 있음을 확인하였다. 특히 단단한 제형으로 인한 치아 및 잇몸 손상 경험(15.0%)과 습식 급여 중 사레 경험(46.0%) 등 실질적인 급여 안전사고 실태를 통해 정량적 지표 도입의 당위성을 확보하였다. 이를 바탕으로 반려견의 해부학적 구조와 체급별 치악력 등 수의학적 근거를 반영하여 유동식부터 고강직식까지 아우르는 5단계의 '반려견 Texture-Code'를 도출하였다. 본 논문은 영양 성분에 치중되었던 기존 품질 관리 패러다임을 물리적 섭식 안전 분야로 확장하고, 향후 반려동물의 지위 변화를 반영한 선진적 사료 관리 체계 수립을 위한 기초 자료를 제공한다는 점에서 학술적·제도적 의의를 지닌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bellows, J., Berg, M. L., Adams, S., Calder, R., Dutton, M. S., Horwitz, C. P., Mouser, J. G., Shipster, Z. L. and Stelzer, P. K. 2019. AAHA dental care guidelines for dogs and cats. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 55(2):49-69. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6933
  2. Bernal, D. N. 2022. Independent study confirms that the effectiveness of dental chew products can vary substantially in their oral health benefits for dogs. White paper, Wellness Pet Company.
  3. Brassard, C., Merlin, M., Guintard, C., Monchâtre-Leroy, E., Barrat, J., Bausmayer, N. and Herrel, A. 2020. Bite force and its relationship to jaw shape in domestic dogs. J. Exp. Biol. 223(16):jeb224352. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.224352
  4. Choi, J. H., Park, E. J. and Lee, H. J. 2019. A study on the market trends analysis of companion animal food and products in Korea. J. Korea Content. Assoc. 19:115-122.
  5. Chu, B., Marwaha, K., Sanvictores, T. and Ayers, D. 2024. Physiology, stress reaction. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL.
  6. Datta, A., Rahman, M., Bostami, M. B., Hossain, M. M. A., Mannan, A., Bhowmik, P. and Biswas, S. 2020. Diagnosis and management of megaesophagus in dog: A case report. Bangladesh J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 8(2):126-129.
  7. Ellis, J. L., Thomason, J., Kebreab, E., Zubair, K. and France, J. 2009. Cranial dimensions and forces of biting in the domestic dog. J. Anat. 214(3):362-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.2009.214.issue-3
  8. Fontaine, E. 2012. Food intake and nutrition during pregnancy, lactation and weaning in the dam and offspring. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 47(Suppl. 6):326-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.2012.47.issue-s6
  9. Food Research Lab. (2025, December 23). Overcoming compliance challenges in pet food manufacturing under IS 11968:2019. Retrieved from https://www.foodresearchlab.com/insights/regulation-updates/pet-food-compliance-challenges-is-11968-2019/ (Accessed January 20, 2026)
  10. Gawor, J., Jodkowska, K., Klim, E., Jank, M. and Nicolas, C. S. 2021. Comparison of a vegetable-based dental chew to 2 other chews for oral health prevention. J. Vet. Dent. 38(3):131-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/08987564211054225
  11. Grobman, M. and Reinero, C. 2023. A One Health review of aerodigestive disease in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 37(3):817-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16661
  12. Han, J., Kim, Y., Seo, K. and Song, K. 2021. Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2 young dogs. J. Vet. Clin. 38(5):231-234. https://doi.org/10.17555/jvc.2021.38.5.231
  13. Harris, R. A., Grobman, M. E., Allen, M. J., Schachtel, J., Rawson, N. E., Bennett, B., Ledyayev, J., Hopewell, B., Coates, J. R., Reinero, C. R. and Lever, T. E. 2017. Standardization of a videofluoroscopic swallow study protocol to investigate dysphagia in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 31(2):383-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14676
  14. Hong, Y. A., Park, M. S. and Yoon, C. M. 2021. A study on regulatory innovation in the food and pet industry(Research Report C 2021-45). Korea Rural Economic Institute. https://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/30221
  15. Hunyar, V. 2024. Timeline of Puppy Teething. Master's Thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
  16. Jo, S. H. and Lee, S. Y. 2023. Legal issues and challenges in pet food labeling system. Bio-Med. Law. 30:33-61.
  17. Jung, H. H. 2018. The physiologic change associated with aging, essential nutrients and their diseases in senior or geriatric dogs. J. Oil Appl. Sci. 35(4):1456-1471.
  18. Jung, H. H. 2025. Assessment (test) methods of pet food palatability and factors influencing palatability: A focus on dogs. Adv. Ind. Sci. 4(2):54-81.
  19. Kang, J. I., Han, S. H., Kim, W. S. and Lee, M. Y. 2025. A review on the effect of oral diseases on systemic health and quality of life in companion dogs. J. Korea Entertain. Ind. Assoc. 19(7):315-326. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2025.11.19.7.315
  20. Kim, K. H., Seo, K., Cho, H. W., Jeon, J. H., Kim, C. H., Jung, J. and Chun, J. L. 2021. Age-related digestibility of nutrients depending on the moisture content in aged dogs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 63(6):1355-1361. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e116
  21. Kim, T. S. (2022, January 31). [Pet health story] Watch out for 'tooth fracture' when eating hard treats [Korean]. K-Health. Retrieved January 6, 2026, from https://www.k-health.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=57881
  22. Leadley, C. (Ed.). 2015. Innovation and Future Trends in Food Manufacturing and Supply Chain Technologies, 1st ed., Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Elsevier Science & Technology, Cambridge, U.K. pp. 321.
  23. Lee, J. H. and Kwon, Y. S. 2023. A research on measures and issues to improve laws and regulations specializing in pet food. Leg. Theory Pract. Rev. 11(4):181-204.
  24. Lee, S. H. (2025, April 27). [Health column] Pet humanization, light and shadow [Korean]. Korea Health Economy. Retrieved March 3, 2026, from https://www.healtheconomy.co.kr/news/article.html?no=33307
  25. Maturana, M., Castillejos, L., Adib Lesaux, A. and Martin-Orue, S. M. 2025. Impact of an abrupt change from dry to canned diet on digestive function and gut microbiota in dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 103:skaf143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf143
  26. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2023. Cultivating National Strategic Industries Such as Pet Food and Pet Healthcare. Press release, Aug 8, 2023. Sejong, Korea. https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5109/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGYmJzJTJGaG9tZSUyRjc5MiUyRjU2NzA3NSUyRmFydGNsVmlldy5kbyUzRnBhc3N3b3JkJTNEJTI2cmdzQmduZGVTdHIlM0QyMDIzLjA4LjA4JTI2YmJzQ2xTZXElM0QlMjZyZ3NFbmRkZVN0ciUzRDIwMjMuMDguMDglMjZpc1ZpZXdNaW5lJTNEZmFsc2UlMjZwYWdlJTNEMSUyNnJvdyUzRDEwJTI2YmJzT3BlbldyZFNlcSUzRCUyNnNyY2hDb2x1bW4lM0RzaiUyNnNyY2hXcmQlM0QlMjY%3D
  27. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2024.4.1. Standards and Specifications of Feed (MAFRA Notice No. 2024-27). MAFRA Sejong, Korea.
  28. McKenzie, S., Brown, W., Billingham, J. and Harris, A. (2005, May). Influence of chewing on dental health in dogs. The University of New England. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266887008_Influence_of_Chewing_on_Dental_Health_in_Dogs
  29. MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2025. Food Code (MFDS Notice No. 2025-56). MFDS, Cheongju, Korea.
  30. Mills, D. S., Demontigny-Bédard, I., Gruen, M., Klinck, M. P., McPeake, K. J., Barcelos, A. M., Hewison, L., Van Haevermaet, H., Denenberg, S., Hauser, H., Koch, C., Ballantyne, K., Wilson, C., Mathkari, C. V., Pounder, J., Garcia, E., Darder, P., Fatjó, J. and Levine, E. 2020. Pain and problem behavior in cats and dogs. Animals, 10(2):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020318
  31. MOLEG (Ministry of Government Legislation). 2021. Senior-Friendly Industry Promotion Act (Act No. 18410). MOLEG, Seoul, Korea.
  32. MOLEG (Ministry of Government Legislation). 2023. Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act (Act No. 19752). MOLEG, Seoul, Korea.
  33. MOLEG (Ministry of Government Legislation). 2025. Food Sanitation Act (Law No. 21065). MOLEG, Seoul, Korea.
  34. Park, S. J. 2020. A Study on the Development of Fermented Food for Senior Dogs. Master's Thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  35. Pascuzzi, S., Sobczak, P., Przywara, A., Kachel, M. and Santoro, F. 2020. Assessment of physical properties of pet-food based on wheat middlings and meat meal. In: Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava, Latvia.
  36. Quinn, R., Masters, S., Starling, M., White, P. J., Mills, K., Raubenheimer, D. and McGreevy, P. 2025. Functional significance and welfare implications of chewing in dogs (Canis familiaris). Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1499933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1499933
  37. Rajkumar, R. 2024. A study of hardness changes in dry pet food packaged under different atmosphere conditions. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 9(4):235-237. https://doi.org/10.22271/veterinary
  38. Schleicher, M., Cash, S. B. and Freeman, L. M. 2019. Determinants of pet food purchasing decisions. Can. Vet. J. 60(6):644-650.
  39. Soltero-Rivera, M., Elliott, M. I., Hast, M. W., Shetye, S. S., Castejon-Gonzalez, A. C., Villamizar-Martinez, L. A., Stefanovski, D. and Reiter, A. M. 2019. Fracture limits of maxillary fourth premolar teeth in domestic dogs under applied forces. Front. Vet. Sci. 5:339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00339
  40. Statistics Korea. 2024. Household projections by province (2020-2050). https://mods.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20108020000&bid=11742&act=view&list_no=421634. Accessed Jan 22, 2026. 108020000&bid=11742&act=view&list_no=421634
  41. Ullal, T. V., Marks, S. L., Belafsky, P. C., Conklin, J. L. and Pandolfino, J. E. 2022. A comparative assessment of the diagnosis of swallowing impairment and gastroesophageal reflux in canines and humans. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.889331
  42. Yoon, J. A. 2022. Update of guidelines: International dysphagia diet standardization initiative 2019. J. Korean Dysphagia Soc. 12(2):115-123. https://doi.org/10.34160/jkds.2022.12.2.005