한국도서관·정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관·정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

KCR5와 KORMARC 형식의 구조적 특성 분석을 통한 적용 연구

A Study on Application through Structural Characteristics Analysis of KCR5 and KORMARC Formats

  • 투고 : 2026.05.14
  • 심사 : 2026.06.08
  • 발행 : 2026.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 KCR5와 KORMARC 형식의 구조적 특성 분석과 적용 시 고려 사항을 살펴보았으며, 그 내용은 다음과 같다. 첫째, KCR5는 FR 개념모형의 개체-관계 중심 구조이지만, KORMARC 형식은 레코드-필드 중심이므로 KCR5의 인코딩 과정에서 구조적 불일치 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 둘째, KCR5에서 저작과 표현형의 속성을 기록하는 요소가 KORMARC의 서지형식에는 있지만, 전거형식에 없는 것들이 있으며, 이에 대한 추가 연구가 필요하다. 셋째, KCR5와 KORMARC 형식을 적용할 경우, ISBD 구두점 적용, 저작 및 표현형과 관련된 서지레코드와 전거레코드의 중복 기록을 허용할 필요성이 있다. 넷째, KCR5의 규정과 관계없이 모든 개체의 레코드를 작성할지, 처음 발행된 자원의 경우 구현형 레코드만 작성할지 검토가 필요하다. 다섯째, KCR5의 서지적 관계 기록에서 식별기호나 전거형접근점 등 하나만 기록하지 말고, 두 가지 모두 기록하는 것이 목록의 링크 기능을 위해 바람직할 것이다.

This study analyzed the structural characteristics of the KCR5 and KORMARC formats and examined considerations for their application, the details of which are as follows. First, since KCR5 is entity-relationship centered on the FR conceptual model and the KORMARC formats are record-field centered, various structural inconsistencies may arise during the encoding process of KCR5. Second, there are elements in KCR5 that record attributes of work and expression that exist in the KORMARC bibliographic format but are absent in the authority format, and these need to be added. Third, when applying KCR5 and KORMARC formats, it is necessary to allow the use of ISBD punctuation and the duplicate recording of bibliographic and authority records related to work and expression. Fourth, regardless of KCR5 regulations, it is necessary to review whether to create records for all entities or to create only records for newly published resources. Fifth, regarding the recording of bibliographic relationships in KCR5, it would be desirable to record both identifiers and authorized access points, rather than just one, to ensure the linking function of the catalog.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2025). A comparative analysis of bibliographic description in KCR5 and KCR4. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 56(3), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.56.3.202509.1
  2. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2026a). Understanding Cataloging Library Resources. Daegu: Taeil Publishing Com.
  3. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2026b). Understanding Korean Cataloging Rules 5th Edition. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  4. Korean Library Association (2025). Korean Cataloguing Rules (5th ed.). Seoul: Korean Library Association. 
  5. Lee, Mihwa (2014). A study on the applicability of ISNI for authority control. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.133
  6. Lee, Mihwa, Lee, Eun-Ju, & Rho, Jee-Hyun (2026). A study on describing KCR5 work and expression in KORMARC. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 60(1), 55-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2026.60.1.055
  7. Lee, Sungsook, Park, Ziyoung, & Lee, Hyewon (2023). A study on the interconnection and utilization of national authority and ISNI. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(1), 457-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.1.457
  8. National Library of Korea (2023a). Korean Machine Readable Cataloging Format: Authority Data. Available: https://librarian.nl.go.kr/
  9. National Library of Korea (2023b). Korean Machine Readable Cataloging Format: Integrated Format for Bibliographic Data. Available: https://librarian.nl.go.kr/
  10. Oh, Dong-Geun, Yea, Ji-Suk, Bae, Yeong-Hwal, & Kwon, Yung-Chan (2007). Understanding KORMARC. Daegu: Taeil Publishing Com.
  11. Rho, Jee-Hyun, Lee, Mihwa, & Lee, Eun-Ju (2026). A study on the application of KCR5 manifestation-level cataloging rules to KORMARC. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science. 60(2), 125-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2026.60.2.125
  12. Carrasco, R. C., Serrano, A., & Castillo-Buergo, R. (2016). A parser for authority control of author names in bibliographic records. Information Processing & Management, 52(5), 753-764.
  13. Guerrini, M. & Possemato, T. (2016). From record management to data management: RDA and new application models BIBFRAME, RIMMF, and OliSuite/WeCat. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(3), 179-199.
  14. Library of Congress (2025). RDA Metadata Guidance Documentation. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/mgd/
  15. OCLC (2025), Bibliographic Formats and Standards, OCLC. Available: https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/home.html
  16. PCC (2020). PCC Guidelines for Minimally Punctuated MARC Bibliographic Records Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/OpCo-2020/.pdf
  17. Tillett, B. B. (2011). Keeping libraries relevant in the semantic web with resource description and access (RDA). Serials, 24(3), 266-272.