• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.25 no.5
• /
• pp.519-526
• /
• 2019

This study proposes a methodology for estimating the appropriate capacity of anchorage for ports requiring the establishment of waiting anchorage and then applying the methodology to the ports in Jinhae Bay to compare it with the anchorage capacity of major ports in Korea. To estimate the appropriate anchorage capacity, the "Anchorage Capacity Index" was used, which was calculated from the "Total Gross Tonnage" and "Simultaneous Anchoring Capacity". The calculations were made according to the anchorage capacity index of 0.89 of the target harbors. The adequate anchorage capacity index for the new waiting anchorage was analyzed at a level of 6.0. If the concept of anchorage capacity index suggested in this study is reflected as a new design criteria of waiting anchorage, it will be helpful for the safety of berth, safety of anchorage and effective operation of harbor.

• Proceedings of KOSOMES biannual meeting
• /
• 2018.06a
• /
• pp.35-35
• /
• 2018

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.493-494
• /
• 2009

Two strengthened columns and an unstrengthened control column were tested to failure under cyclic lateral load combined with a constant axial load to effect of anchorage of T-shaped steel plate in the strengthened column using wire rope units. Main variables considered were anchorage method of T-shaped steel plate. Tested columns were compared with those of conventionally tied columns tested by research of before. Test results showed that lateral load capacity and the displacement ductility ratio of anchorage of T-shaped steel plate in the strengthened column increased 40% and 130% than unstrengthened column, respectively. In particular, at the same effective lateral reinforcement index, a much ductility ratio was observed in the strengthened columns than in the tied columns.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.28 no.5
• /
• pp.611-620
• /
• 2016

In the construction of nuclear power plants, only 420 MPa reinforcing bars are allowed and, therefore, so many large-diameter bars are placed, which results in steel congestion. Consequently, re-bar works are difficult and the quality of RC structures may be deteriorated. To solve the steel congestion, 550 MPa bars are necessary. Among many items for verifying structural performance of reinforced concrete with 550 MPa bars, the 43 mm hooked bars are examined in this study. All specimens failed by side-face blowout and the side cover explosively spalled at maximum loads. The bar force was initially transferred to the concrete primarily by bond along a straight portion. At the one third of maximum load, the bond reached a peak capacity and began to decline, while the hook bearing component rose rapidly. At failure, most load was resisted by the hook bearing. For confined specimens with hoops, the average value of test-to-prediction ratios by KCI code is 1.45. The modification factor of confining reinforcement which was not allowed for larger than 35 mm bars can be applied to 43 mm hooked bars. For specimens with 70 MPa concrete, the average value of test-to-prediction ratios by KCI code is 1.0 which is less than the values of the other specimens. The effects of concrete compressive strength should be reduced. An equation to predict anchorage capacity of hooked bars was developed from regression analysis including the effects of compressive strength of concrete, embedment length, side cover thickness, and transverse reinforcement index.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.217-224
• /
• 2013

Design provisions for the development length of headed bars in ACI 318-08 include concrete compressive strength and yield strength of headed bars as design parameters but do not consider the effects of transvers reinforcement. In addition, they have very strict limitation for clear spacing and material strengths because these provisions were developed based on limited tests. In this study, splice tests using SD600 headed bars with $2d_b$ clear spacing and transverse reinforcement were conducted. Test results show that unconfined specimens failed due to prying action and bottom cover concrete prematurely spalled. The contribution of head bearing on the anchorage strength is only 15% on average implying that unconfined specimens failed before the head bearing was not sufficiently developed. Confined specimens with stirrups placed along whole splice length have enhanced strengths in bearing as well as bond because the stirrups prevented prying action and improved bond capacity. Bond failure occurred in locally confined specimens where stirrups were placed only at the ends of splice length. The stirrups at ends of splice lengths can prevent prying action but the bond capacity did not increase. From regression analysis of test results, an equation to predict anchorage strength of headed bars was developed. The proposed equation consists of bond and bearing contributions and includes transverse reinforcement index. The average ratio of tests to predictions is 1.0 with coefficient of variation of 6%.