• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.657-682
• /
• 2004

계약법과 관련한 많은 주제 중에서 본 고에서는 미국과 한국에서의 부당이득법리를 중심으로 비교연구를 하였으며 한미간의 부당이득법리의 차이가 분쟁해결수단의 선택에 어떠한 영향을 미칠 수 있을 것인가를 살펴보았다. 미국의 부당이득법리와 한국의 부당이득법리를 세 가지 관점에서 비교 고찰하였다. 첫째, 부당이득의 법리적 특성에서 살펴본 바에 의하면 양국 모두 형평과 공정성에 의하여 해석되어 지고 있다는 점에서 상당한 공통점을 발견할 수 있었지만, 한국에서는 '법률상 원인 없이'라고 하는 명시된 규정에 의하는 반면 미국에서는 단순히 '불공정성'이라고만 하여 법률적 해석기준을 다소 모호하게 하고 있음을 발견하였다. 둘째, 부당이득 성립요건에서는 한미간 상당한 차이가 나타난 바, 미국에서는 '피고가 부당이득 사실에 대하여 인지하고 있어야 한다'라고 하는 반면 한국에서는 부당이득 사실에 대한 피고의 선의 악의를 구분하지 않음으로서 미국이 한국보다 원고의 입증책임을 엄격하게 적용하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 부당이득의 효과와 관련하여 양국 모두 원물의 반환 내지는 합리성과 시장가격에 근거한 상당금액의 보상을 법적 구제범위로 설정함으로서 차이가 없었다. 결론적으로 미국에서는 부당이득법리가 분쟁의 쟁점인 경우에 '불공정성'에 대한 법적 해석의 모호성과, 악의에 대한 입증 책임 등으로 인하여 법정에서의 해결보다는 우호적 해결 방식인 중재가 한국보다 상대적으로 많이 채택될 것으로 보여 진다

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.123-156
• /
• 2004

Settlement of investment disputes is quite different from that of commercial disputes arising from ordinary commercial transactions in view of disputing parties, applicable laws and rules, etc.. Therefore, it is very important to consider the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States(Washington Convention) of 1965. The creation of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes(ICSID), which was established under the Washington Convention, was the belief that an institution specially designed to facilitate the settlement of investment disputes between governments and foreign investors could help to promote increased flows of international investment. Pursuant to the Washington Convention, ICSID provides facilities for the conciliation and arbitration of disputes between member countries and investors who qualify as nationals of other member countries. Recourse to ICSID conciliation and arbitration is entirely voluntary. However, once the parties have consented to arbitration under the Washington Convention, neither can unilaterally withdraw its consent. Moreover, all Contracting States of the Washington Convention are required by the Convention to recognize and enforce ICSID arbitral awards. Provisions on ICSID arbitration are commonly found in investment contracts between governments of member countries and investors from other member countries. Advance consents by governments to submit investment disputes to ICSID arbitration can also be found in many bilateral investment treaties including the Korea-China Agreement on the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments(1992), the Korea-Japan Agreement for the Liberalization, Promotion and Protection of Investment(2003) and the Korea-Chile FTA, the latter was signed as of February 15, 2003 and is still pending in the National Assembly for its ratification. Arbitration under the auspices of ICSID is similarly one of the main mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes under the bilateral treaties on investment. Therefore, it is a problem of vital importance that Korean parties interested in investment to foreign countries should understand and cope with the settlement mechanism of investment disputes under the Washington Convention and bilateral investment treaties.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.31-47
• /
• 2008

An arbitrator's duty shall be independence and impartiality such as a judge who has procedurally absolute position. Independence is the freedom from others, impartiality is the status of having no-partial condition. Although these show relevance between independence and impartiality, in actuality, it is not easy to prove them. Therefore, arbitrator has to prove his or her position by opening the public of reality and by having an obligation of notification. Each country which applies Arbitration rules or Arbitration act stays the same as Korean Commercial Arbitration Board does. Hence, each country has the moral principles in order to establish a standard of judgement for essential factors and requests preferentially the impartiality and the publicity. In reality, court of justice in England excludes arbitrator who has the close relation to a person concerned. Justice in France cancelled an authorization of arbitrator because of having the economic interest to the person concerned. And also, In United States, Federal Court reverses an arbitration judgment without giving any partiality to a person concerned because of not opening a public about the relationship between arbitrator and a person concerned. Therefore, decision basis of the independence and the impartiality is standardized by the economic interest of a person concerned, professional relation, society connection, relationship between arbitrator and arbitration representative in the same case while in process of arbitration, arbitrator's nationality If arbitrator does not keep the independence and the impartiality by a position of judge, he or she has to make responsible. this duty is divided by two things: civil case and crime case. and if arbitrator does break this responsibility, he or she will get the cancellation of judge and compensation of damage. However, Korea is placed in the real circumstance without judge precedent and moral principles including the independence and impartiality. In order to getting the good reputation of international arbitration institution, this country will have to enact principles of the independence and impartiality for arbitrator.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2020

기업 시스템 환경에서 실제업무의 적용단계인 단말(Endpoint)에서 발생하는 의심스러운 행위를 탐지하고 통제하는 것은 조직의 비즈니스 환경을 안전하게 하는 가장 핵심적인 영역이라 할 것이다. 내외부로부터의 위협을 정확하게 탐지하고 차단하기 위해서는 조직 내 모든 단말의 모든 영역을 모니터링하고 관련 정보를 수집할 수 있어야 한다. 즉 끊임없는 악성코드의 도전으로부터 기업조직의 안전한 비즈니스 환경을 유지하기 위해서는 기존 보편화 되었던 알려진 패턴이나 시그니처, 정책, 룰 기준의 탐지와 방어 중심의 클라이언트 보안을 넘어 PC등 업무용 단말에서 발생하는 모든 일을 파악하고 모니터링 할 수 있도록 하는 EDR 솔루션 도입은 이제 보안의 필수적인 요소가 되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 EDR솔루션에 요구되는 필수적인 기능을 살펴보고, 보안문제에 대한 능동적인 선행적 탐지를 기반으로 하는 지능적인 EDR시스템의 설계와 발전방안에 대해 연구하고자 한다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2016

건설 프로젝트에서 생산되는 대부분의 데이터는 텍스트 기반의 비정형 데이터이다. 계약서, 시방서, RFi 등 수많은 텍스트 문서들을 효과적으로 분석하기 위해서는 텍스트 마이닝과 같은 비정형 텍스트 데이터 분석 방법이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 과거에 수행되었던 해외건설공사 프로젝트의 입찰 관련 문서들을 대상으로 텍스트 마이닝을 실시하였으며, 그 결과 빈출단어의 유형, 단어들 간의 연관관계, 문서들의 토픽 유형들에 대한 파악이 가능하였다. 본 연구는 텍스트 마이닝을 활용한 해외건설공사 입찰 정보 분석을 통해 비정형 텍스트 데이터를 효과적으로 분석할 수 있는 방안을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 향후 관련 분야 연구를 확장시킬 수 있는 기반을 마련할 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.357-379
• /
• 2013

최근 우리나라는 외화획득용 원료 등 구매제도에 대해 전자화를 도입하게 되었다. 정부는 구매확인서의 전자화를 위해서 2011년에 대외무역관리규정을 개정하였다. 또한, 외화획득용 원료 등 구매제도에는 구매확인서에 이어 2012년에 내국신용장도 전자화하였다. 이는 우리나라 전자무역이 로컬거래 절차의 전자화를 추진하게 되는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 외화획득용 물품관리제도에 대한 선행적 고찰과 대외무역관리규정의 개정을 통한 구매확인서 전자발급의 의무화 및 한국은행 무역금융 취급세칙의 개정으로 내국신용장의 전자개설 의무화에 따른 이론적, 법적 고찰과 로컬거래 절차의 전자화의 추진인로컬거래 통합관리시스템의 구축에 있어 법적, 실무적 문제점과 대응방안을 분석하였다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.131-155
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this thesis is to study on the philosophical analysis model and its methodological application of information systems research evaluation from critical realist perspective. Fist of all, I examine ontological epistemological methodological assertions of critical realism. Because the philosophy of critical realism is an opportunity for information systems study. I examine Dobson and Mutch's critical realist perspective on actors-structure model. I suggest a critical realist actors-praxis-structure model. This model provides the potential for a new approach to social investigations in its provision of an ontology for the analytical separation of structure and agency. Of most importance might be the incorporation of non-humans into the analysis of social interaction and of technology into the elaboration of structures. I also examine Tsoukas's critical realistic meta-theory of management. I suggest a critical realist IS management model. This model elucidate the nature of management and delineate the scope of applicability of various perspectives on management. The causal powers of management reside in the real domain and, taken together, their logics are contradictory, the effects of their contradictory composition are contingent upon prevailing contingencies. I analyze Carlsson's theory of design knowledge. His framework builds on that the aim of IS design science research is to develop practical knowledge for the design and realization of different classes of IS initiatives, where IS are viewed as socio-technical systems and not just IT artefacts. The framework proposes that the output of IS design science research is practical IS design knowledge in the form of field-tested and grounded technological rules. The IS design knowledge is developed through an IS design science research cycle. In conclusion, I think that IS actors-praxis-structure model, meta-theoretical IS management model, and IS design knowledge model according to critical realistic approach are very useful for IS research evaluation. Nevertheless, important problems are left not resolved.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.107-131
• /
• 2013

Online-ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) has been receiving attention from the international community as a means of alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes in both small and mass international e-commerce. The EU Parliament and the Council proposed the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation for Consumer Disputes (hereafter, "EU Consumer ODR Regulation") and the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution of Consumer Disputes (hereafter, "EU Consumer ADR Directive") as a legislative package, now scheduled to be adopted. Those efforts strengthen consumer protection by enhancing ODR in international e-commerce and improving of the functions of the e-commerce market. The EU Consumer ADR and ODR regulation package will operate in conjunction with the ODR platform as a single point across Europe, abandoning the ADR system of each member. Consumers and traders who need dispute resolution apply on the EU ODR platform linked website, and the applications are distributed to individual ADR institutions in accordance with the Rules and Procedure of ADR institutions in the respective country. Although there has been partial progress in Korea for ODR programs such as the establishment of the Online Administrative Trial and the procedures of individual ADR agencies operating through the website, existing norms do not fully support the system. At this point, we see many implications of the EU Consumer ADR and ODR regulation package on the direction chosen for domestic ADR and ODR policy and legislation. This study introduces the main features and content of the EU Consumer ADR Directive (draft) and ODR Regulation provisions, and describes the direction of domestic policy and legislation regarding Online-ADR.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 2013

This study aims to analyze the main features of Mongolian arbitration system compared with Korean Arbitration Law which was revised under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Model Law. On the basis of this comparative study, certain differences are suggested: First, the environment of Mongolian arbitration is still insufficient in terms of its operation and usage at the international level. Second, the Mongol National Arbitration Court has established Ad-hoc Arbitration Rules and has promoted Ad-hoc Arbitration although it is an institutional arbitration organization. Third, the arbitration objects are defined as the types of tangible and intangible assets in Mongolia which are different from those of the Korean Arbitration Law. Accordingly, court and officer disputes, family disputes, labor-management relations, and criminal matters are covered by the arbitration objects. Fourth, Mongol Arbitration Law specifies the following persons disqualified for arbitrator appointment: the member of the Constitutional Court, judge, procurator, inquiry officer, investigator, court decision enforcement officer, attorney, or notary who has previously rendered legal service to any party of the disputes, and any officials who are prohibited by laws to be engaged in positions above the scope of their duties. Fifth, the arbitrator selection and appointment criteria should be documented, and the arbitrator should have the ability to resolve the disputes independently and fairly and achieve concord from both parties. Sixth, if there is no agreement between the parties, the arbitration language should be Mongolian, and the arbitral tribunal has no power to decide on it. Seventh, despite the agreement for a documentary hearing between the parties, there should be provided opportunities for an oral hearing if either of the parties requires it. Eighth, if the parties do not understand the language of the arbitration, the parties can directly ask the translation service. They should also keep secrets in the process of arbitration. Ninth, the cancellation of arbitral award is allowed by the application of the parties, not by the authority of the court. Except for the nine differences above, the Mongolian arbitration system is similar to that of the Korean Arbitration Law. This paper serves to contribute to the furtherance in trade relationship between Mongolia and Korea after the rapid and efficient resolution of disputes.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.389-417
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 1991년 "영유아보육법" 제정 이후 20여 년간 우리나라의 어린이집 현황과 설치 및 인가 기준의 변화와 보육의 공공성에 대해 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 1991년부터 2013년까지의 어린이집 현황과 "영유아보육법"의 개정에 따른 어린이집의 설치기준에 대한 변화 경향을 입지조건, 유형 및 규모, 면적, 실내 외 설비, 놀이터, 기타로 구분하여 살펴보았으며, 그것의 인가기준에 대해 알아보았다. 이와 함께 보육의 공공성에 대한 개념과 기준을 정리하였다. 마지막으로 "영유아보육법"과 시행규칙에 나타난 어린이집의 설치기준과 인가 기준의 문제점을 제시하고, 향후 어린이집 설치 및 인가 제도의 개선과 공공성 확보를 위한 제안을 하였다. 이러한 기초자료 제공 및 관련 논의를 통해 본 연구는 우리나라 보육의 질을 제공하는데 기여하고자 한다.