• Journal of dental hygiene science
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.155-161
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to obtain data necessary for guiding students in the future by grasping which rate of error is made how much depending on a shooting technique in the filming of periapical radiograph. 14,402 films, which were instructed targeting students for the Department of Dental Hygiene at D Health College and S Health College, were analyzed. The following results were obtained by conducting questionnaire survey targeting 263 students who completed the shooting practice lesson of bisecting angle technique and paralleling technique. 1. In case of having shot with bisecting angle technique, the ratio of error was the highest in both maxillary and mandibular first molar. 2. In case of having shot with paralleling technique, the ratio of error was the highest in the maxillary bicuspid and the mandibular first molar. 3. As for ratio of error in light of a shooting technique, both bisecting angle technique and paralleling technique were indicated to be the highest in inaccuracy of film position. The bisecting angle technique was indicated to have the higher ratio of error compared to the paralleling technique. 4. As for ratio of error in light of the processing technique, both bisecting angle technique and paralleling technique were indicated to be the highest in dark image and light image. The bisecting angle technique was indicated to have the higher ratio of error compared to the paralleling technique. 5. Students were indicated to feel it to be most difficult for grasping the processing level in the film-developing process. As the above results, to reduce ratio of error given the periapical radiography, a method of reducing ratio of error given the periapical radiography is considered to be what correctly understands the morphological and anatomical structure inside the mouth and what acquires the shooting technique by filming several times with having enough time.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.471-489
• /
• 1998

For the successful endodontic treatment, root canal should be cleaned thoroughly by accurate mechanical and chemical canal preparation and sealed completely with canal filling material without damaging the periapical tissues. The accuracy of the root canal length measurement is a prerequisite for the success of the endodontic treatment, and the root canal length is often determined by the standard periapical radiographs and digital tactile sense. In this study, the accuracy and the clinical usefulness of Digora/sup (R)/, an intraoral digital imaging processor and the conventional standard radiographs were compared by measuring the length from the top of the file to the root apex. 30 single rooted premolars were invested in a uniformly sized blocks and No.25 K-file was inserted into and fixed in each canal. Each block was placed in equal distance and position to satisfy the principle of the bisecting angle and paralleling techniques and Digora/sup (R)/ system's image and standard periapical radiographs were taken. Each radiograph was examined by 3 different observers by measuring the length from top of the file to the root apex and each data was compared and analyzed. The results were as follows; 1. In the bisecting angle technique, the average difference between the Digora/sup (R)/ system and standard periapical radiograph was 0.002 mm and the standard deviation was 0.341 mm which showed no statistically significant difference between the two systems(p>0.05). Also, in the paralleling technique, the average difference between these two system was 0.007 mm and the standard deviation was 0.323 mm which showed no statistically significant difference between the two systems(p>0.05). 2. In Digora/sup (R)/ system, the average difference between the bisecting angle and paralleling technique was -0.336 mm and the standard deviation was 0.472 mm which showed a statistically significant difference between the two techniques(p<0.05). Also, in the standard periapical radiographs, the average difference between the bisecting angle and paralleling technique was 0.328 mm and the standard deviation was 0.517 mm which showed a statistically significant difference between these two techniques(p<0.05). 3. In Digora/sup (R)/ system and the standard periapical radiographs. there was a statistically significant difference between the measurement using the bisecting angle technique and the actual length(p<0.05), But there was no statistically significant difference between the measurement using the paralleling technique and the actuallength(p>0.05). In conclusion. the determination of the root canal length by using the Digora/sup (R)/ system can give us as good an image as the standard periapical radiograph and using the paralleling technique instead of the bisecting angle technique can give a measurement closer to the actual canal length. thereby contributing to a successful result. Also. considering the advantages of the digital imaging processor such as decreasing the amount of exposure to the patient. immediate use of the image. magnification of image size. control of the contrast and brightness and the ability of storing the image can give us good reason to replace the standard periapical radiographs.

• Journal of dental hygiene science
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.97-102
• /
• 2004

In order to find out the rate of error according to intraoral standard radiographic techniques, this study analyzed 3,251 standard films, and conducted a questionnaire with 120 Daegu Health College students who have used the bisecting angle technique and the paralleling technique. Followed are the results of the study: 1. The rate of error was the highest in canine from both maxilla and mandible when used by the bisecting angle technique. 2. The rate of error was the highest in premolar from both maxilla and mandible when used by the paralleling technique. 3. The technical error was occurred most frequently in elongation. 4. The rate of error and distortion was higher in the bisecting angle technique than in the paralleling technique. 5. The processing error was occurred most frequently in light film. 6. In applying radiographic techniques, the subjects indicated that the vertical angulation of central radiation in the bisecting angle technique and the oral fixation of film holder in the paralleling technique were the most difficult.

• Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene
• /
• v.12 no.5
• /
• pp.987-997
• /
• 2012

Objectives : This study was carried out in order to obtain basic data for students' efficient acquirement and instruction of radiography technology in the future by surveying dental hygiene students' recognition of periapical radiography. Methods : This study carried out a questionnaire survey targeting dental hygiene students from December 2009 to December 2010, and obtained the following results. Results : 1. As a result of examining recognition on periapical radiography, the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be averagely $3.84{\pm}0.566$ points. The paralleling technique was indicated to be $2.66{\pm}0.701$ points. 2. As a result of examining about problems given the bisecting angle technique, what had been most difficult given the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be the highest in cone positioning with 34.2%. The most difficulty given deciding on the X-ray vertical-angel irradiation direction was indicated to be the highest with 66.9% in adjusting the cone direction on the virtual bisector. 3. As a result of examining about problems given the paralleling technique, what had been most difficult in the process of the paralleling technique was indicated to be the highest with 56.7% in fixing the film immobilization device inside the mouth. Conclusions : Examining the above results, it is considered that there is a need of understanding morphological and anatomical structure inside the mouth in order to reduce the mistake rate given the periapical radiography, and that it is important to increase skill level by repetitively shooting several times with having enough time.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.315-333
• /
• 1990

This study was performed to measure the skin absorbed doses from full mouth standard intraoral radiography (l4 exposures) in bisecting angle and paralleling techniques. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used in a phantom. Circular tube collimator(60㎜ in diameter, 20㎝ in length) and rectangular collimator(35㎜ × 44㎜, 40㎝ in length) were set for bisecting angle and paralleling techniques respectively. All measurement sites were classified into 8 groups according to distance from each point of central rays. The results were as follows: 1. The skin absorbed doses from the paralleling technique were significantly decreased than those from the bisecting technique in both points at central ray and points away from central ray. The percentage rates of decrease were greater at points away from central ray than those at central ray. 2. The skin absorbed doses at the lens of eye, parotid gland, submandibular gland and thyroid region were significantly decreased in paralleling techniuqe, but those of the midline of palate remained similar in both techniques. 3. The highest doses were measured at the site 20mm above the point of central ray for the mandibular premolars in bisecting angle technique and at the point of central ray for the mandibular premolars in paralleling techniques. The lowest doses were measured at the thyroid region in both techniques.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.103-112
• /
• 1986

The purpose of this study was to investigate the numbers and causes of retakes in 300 complete mouth radiographic surveys made by 75 senior dental students. According to radiographic techniques and film holding methods, they were divided into 4 groups: Group Ⅰ: Bisecting-angle technique with patient's fingers. Group Ⅱ: Bisecting-angle technique with Rinn Snap-A-Ray device. Group Ⅲ: Paralleling technique with Rinn XCP instrument (short cone) Group Ⅳ: Paralleling technique with Rinn XCP instrument (long cone) The most frequent cause of retakes, the most frequent tooth area examined, of retakes and average number of retakes per complete mouth survey were evaluated. The obtained results were as follows: Group Ⅰ: Incorrect film placement(47.8%), upper canine region, and 0.89 Group Ⅱ: Incorrect film placement (44.0%), upper molar region, and 1.12. Group Ⅲ: Incorrect film placement (79.2%), upper molar region, and 2.05 Group Ⅳ: Incorrect film placement (67.7%), upper molar region, and 1.69. The average number of retakes per complete mouth survey of paralleling technique (Group Ⅲ＋Ⅳ) was higher than that of bisecting-angle technique (Group Ⅰ ＋ Ⅱ) (p<0.01). There was no difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ, and between Group Ⅲ and Group Ⅳ in the average number of retakes per complete mouth survey (p>0.05).

• Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.111-124
• /
• 2009

This study analyzes through the review of literature and laws the exposure time, clinical frequency, and radiation exposure of intraoral and extraoral radiography as well as of panoramic radiography performed by dental hygienists in dental clinics, compares the dental radiology curriculums of radiological science and dental hygiene departments, and proposes the expansion of dental hygienists' radiography operations. The radiology curriculums were compared between the radiological science and dental hygiene departments of colleges. For new analysis by radiography for dental diagnosis, the exposure time, radiation absorbed dose, effective dose, and number of days of natural radiation were compared by the type of oral radiation films and radiographical techniques proposed by domestic and international studies. The exposure time of panoramic radiography is 15 seconds and it takes about two minutes for completion, whereas the exposure time of the standard radiography is 0.2~0.8 seconds and it takes 10 times longer for completion of the radiography of full mouth than the panoramic radiography. The standard radiography can cause distortions of radiation at severely curved parts of dental arch and palatopharyngeal reflex. However, panoramic radiography can be performed even for lock jaw patients, causes less inconvenience to patients and is much simpler than the standard radiography. The percentage of dental clinics where radiography is performed by dental hygienists was 92.0%, and the percentage of standard film radiography by dental hygienists was 98% whereas the percentage of panoramic radiography by dental hygienists was 92%. For the absorbed dose which is an indicator of radiation exposure, the When the effective dose which is an indicator of the danger of radiation exposure was converted to the number of days of natural radiation, it was 3.3 days for panoramic radiography, but 13.9 days for the full mouth standard radiography by bisecting angle technique which was 4.2 times longer than the panoramic radiography. There were two colleges that had a dental radiology course with two credits in the departments of radiological science. The credits for dental radiology courses in the department of dental hygiene ranged varied by college, ranging from 3 to 8; on average, the theory course was 2.2 credits and the practice course was 2.02 credits. To summarize the above results, the percentage of dental clinics where panoramic radiography is performed by dental hygienists under the guidance of dentists is high. Panoramic radiography has become an essential facility for dental clinics. It is faster than standard film radiography and less dangerous due to low radiation exposure. Panoramic radiography is a simple mechanical job that does not require training of oral radiography by radiotechnologist. Because panoramic radiography is one of major operations which must be performed at all times in dental clinics, it must be designated as intraoral technique rather than extraoral technique, or legalized for inclusion in the scope of operations of dental hygienists.