• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2014

Purpose: Capseal I and Capseal II are calcium silicate and calcium phosphate based experimental root canal sealers. This study sought to evaluate the biocompatibility and mineralization potential of Capseal I and Capseal II. Materials and Methods: The biocompatibility and mineralization related gene expression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP], bone sialoprotein [BSP], and osteocalcin) of Capseal I and Capseal II were compared using methylthiazol tetrazolium assay and reverse transcription-polymerization chain reaction analysis, respectively. The results were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Result: Both Capseal I and Capseal II were favorable in terms of biocompatibility, influencing the messenger RNA expression of ALP and BSP. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Capseal is biocompatible, with mineralization promoting potential; thus, it could be a promising root canal sealer.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.36-49
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity by MTT test and genotoxicity by Ames test of new calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers (CAPSEAL I, CAPSEAL II) with commercially available resin-based sealers (AH 26, AH Plus) , zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers (Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT), calcium hydroxide-based sealer (Sealapex), and tricalcium phosphate based sealers (Sankin Apatite Root Canal Sealer I, II, III). According to this study, the results were as follows : 1. The extracts of freshly mixed group showed higher toxicity than those of 24 h set group in MTT assay (p<0.001). 2. CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II were less cytotoxic than AH 26, AH Plus, Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT Sealapex and SARCS II in freshly mixed group (p<0.01). 3. AH 26 in freshly mixed group showed mutagenicity to TA98 and TA100 with and without S9 mix and AH Plus extracts also were mutagenic to TA100 with and without S9 mix. 4. Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT and Sealapex in freshly mixed group were mutagenic to TA100 with S9 mix. 5. Among those of 24 h set groups the extracts of SARCS II were mutagenic to TA98 with and without S9 mix and AH 26 showed mutagenic effects to TA98 with S9 mix. 6. No mutagenic effect of CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II was detected. 7. There is no statistically significant difference between CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II at MTT assay and Ames test in both freshly mixed group and 24 h set group.

• Proceedings of the KACD Conference
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.592-593
• /
• 2003

I. Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo the biocompatibility of new calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers(CAPSEAL I, CAPSEAL II) with another type of commercially available calcium phosphate sealer (Apatite Root Sealer type I, Apatite Root Sealer type II) and zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer (Pulp Canal Sealer EWT) after implantaion in rat subcutaneous tissue. II. Materials and Methods 64 Sprague-Dawley rats were used. There were five groups of three animals each for experimental period of 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks. The teflon tubes, 5mm in length with an inner diameter of 1.5mm, were washed with ethanol and distilled weter and autoclaved.(omitted)