• Korean Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2003

This study is designed to analyse the difference between consciousness and behaviors for environmental preservation dependant on independent variables and to identify factors that affect the behaviors of environmental preservation. For this study, a questionnaire that included measurements of environmental preservation consciousness and behaviors was produced as a studying tool. Targets were 520 boy and girl students in the second grade of two high schools in Gwangju and three high schools in small districts of Chonnam Province and 482 questionnaires were distributed for the analysis. The data collected was analysed using SAS Program Package to obtain frequency, percentage, standard deviation, and correlation and T-Test One-way ANOVA, Duncan's M411ip1e Range Test, Multiple Regression were performed. The results of the analyses are as follows : 1. Overall, environmental preservation consciousness is higher than preservation behaviors. Interest in air pollution is the highest in both environmental preservation consciousness and behaviors and it is low in recycling. 2. The environmental preservation consciousness has a significant difference dependant on sex, regions, order of birth, educational background of parents and income level. the performing degree of environmental education, consciousness about kinds of environmental preservation, and whether the learning of theory and practice of environmental education is performed. 3. The environmental preservation behaviors has a significant difference dependant on regions, educational background of mother, mother's job, income level, acquiring of information, performing degree of environmental education and consciousness of kinds of environmental education. 4. Variables that affect environmental preservation behavior are environmental preservation consciousness, acquiring information, performing degree of environmental education and awareness of environmental preservation. Their power of explanation is 15%.

• Hwankyungkyoyuk
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.348-364
• /
• 1999

The objectives of this study were: (a) to measure the level of rural community residents' environmental preservation consciousness, (b) to identify the variables related to their level of environmental preservation consciousness, and (c) to provide suggestions to improve their environmental preservation consciousness. The major findings of this study were as follows; 1) Personal characteristics- gender, years of education, age, and income- were related to the rural communities residents' the environmental preservation consciousness. 2) Social characteristics- membership in environmental organizations, participation in environmental preservation campaigns, environmental dispute within their communities, experiences of participation in environmental dispute in their communities, participation in environmental education-were related to the rural community residents' the environmental preservation consciousness. Based on the above findings, the following suggestions are offered: 1) To improve rural community residents' environmental preservation consciousness, residents in rural community should be motivated and encouraged to participate in environmental and agriculture-related organizations. 2) To effectively solve environmental disputes among rural community residents and between rural communities, central and local governments should provide opportunities for rural residents to acquire their sound environmental consciousness. 3) Environmental preservation consciousness should be assessed including affective domain, cognitive domain, and behavioral domain. Appropriate environmental education programs should be developed after considering rural residents' personal characteristics including education level, income, gender, years of residency, and are.

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.34-39
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.56-60
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.61-65
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.75-76
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.371
• /
• pp.52-54
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.367
• /
• pp.29-33
• /
• 2007

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.29 s.372
• /
• pp.29-32
• /
• 2007