• Title/Summary/Keyword: Femoral fixation

Search Result 82, Processing Time 0.045 seconds

Effects of Femoral Head Anterior Glide Fixation during Active Straight Leg Raise on Hip Flexor Strength in Subjects with Femoral Anterior Glide Type

  • Su-yeon Bae;Jin-seok Lee;Eun-seop Shin;Geum-seong Myung;Kyung-joon Kang;In-Cheol Jeon
    • The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
    • /
    • v.35 no.4
    • /
    • pp.117-123
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: In this study, subjects with femoral anterior glide type were examined to investigate the effects of femoral head anterior glide fixation during active straight leg raise on the strength of the hip flexor in a supine position. Methods: Fifteen subjects participated in this study. All subjects were classified through an evaluation form for femoral anterior glide type (FAGT). The strength of the hip flexor was measured during active straight leg raise test (ASLR test), and compared with and without femoral anterior glide fixation in a supine position. The fixation of the femoral head was achieved as per the therapist's manual guidelines. Paired t-test was applied to compare changes in the strength of the hip flexor according to fixation conditions. The level of statistical significance was set at α=0.05. Results: The strength of the hip flexor was lesser during the ASLR test with fixation compared to without fixation (p=0.007). Conclusion: The strength of the hip flexor decreases with fixation. Results of this study revealed a difference between hip flexor strength, with and without femoral anterior glide fixation during ASLR, in subjects with femoral anterior glide type.

Conversion to Internal Fixation after Temporary External Fixation for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Polytrauma Patients (다발성 외상 환자의 대퇴골 간부 골절에서 임시 외고정술 후 내고정술로의 전환)

  • Choo, Suk-Kyu;Kang, Kyung-Woon;Kim, Young-Woo;Oh, Hyoung-Keun
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.151-157
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: We report the surgical outcomes for femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma patients who were temporarily treated with external fixation and subsequently converted to internal fixation. Methods: From August 2008 to April 2012, we enrolled 13 patients with multiple traumas due to high-energy injuries and concurrent femoral shaft fractures in which temporary external fixation was carried out. The mean age was 39 years, with a range from 18 to 55 years. Ten were men and 3 were women. According to the AO/OTA classification of fractures, type A was found in 5 patients, type B in 6, and type C in 2, with open fractures being found in 6 patients and femoral artery rupture occurring in 2. For internal fixation, intramedullary nailing was performed in 7 patients, and minimally-invasive fixation of locking compression plates was used in 6. Results: Of the 7 patients converted to intramedullary nailing, 1 experienced delayed union. Of the 6 patients treated with minimally-invasive plate fixation, delayed union occurred in 5, and an auto-bone graft was performed within, on average, 8 months (range: 5~10 months), leading to bone union in all cases in the final follow-up. None of the patients experienced infections or complications involving other organs after having been converted to internal fixation. During the mean follow-up of 19 months, patients achieved satisfactory functional outcomes. Conclusion: In polytrauma patients with a femoral shaft fracture who have been treated with temporary external fixation and who may need internal fixation due to the occurrence of delayed union, an appropriate internal fixation method needs to be selected based on the patient's physical status, and the fracture type.

Surgical Treatment of Ipsilateral Multi-Level Femoral Fracture Treated Using Antegrade Intramedullary Nail

  • Kim, Beom-Soo;Cho, Jae-Woo;Yeo, Do-Hyun;Oh, Jong-Keon
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.96-102
    • /
    • 2018
  • Ipsilateral fractures of proximal femur with shaft and condylar region are very rare. Current concept of management is based on fixation of each fracture as independent entity using separate fixation modalities for proximal and distal parts of femur. However, we considered that antegrade femoral nailing with cephalomedullary screw fixation is a good option for ipsilateral multi-level femoral fractures. Here, we present an experience of satisfactory treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck fracture, subtrochanteric fracture, comminuted shaft fracture with supracondylar fracture following road traffic accident.

Stress Analysis of Plate Augumentation for Distal Femur Fracture (대퇴부 원위부 골절에 관한 금속판 보강술의 응력 해석)

  • 김지숙;범현규;양영수
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 1997.10a
    • /
    • pp.816-819
    • /
    • 1997
  • The operation of femoral non-union after IM(Intramedullary) nailing in distally femoral fractures is considered. Augmentive plate fixation is the management of femoral non-union after IM nailing. The purpose of this study is to compare the bending, torsional stiffness and stress distribution of the two operations by the FEM(Finite Element Method). Augmentive plate fixation is better than IM nail fixation. These results conclude that plate augmentation is a useful method for the unstable femoral non-union after interlocking IM nailing.

  • PDF

Surgical Treatment of the Atypical Femoral Fracture: Overcoming Femoral Bowing

  • Lee, Kyung-Jae;Min, Byung-Woo
    • Hip & pelvis
    • /
    • v.30 no.4
    • /
    • pp.202-209
    • /
    • 2018
  • Atypical femoral fractures differ from ordinary femoral diaphyseal or subtrochanteric fractures in several aspects. Although several authors have reported the results of surgical treatment for atypical femoral fractures, the rate of complications (e.g., delayed union, nonunion, fixation failure, and reoperation) is still high. Therefore, we reviewed principles of surgical treatment and describe useful methods for overcoming femoral bowing in these high-risk patients.

Exchange Nailing for Aseptic Nonunion of the Femoral Shaft after Intramedullary Nailing

  • Ha, Sung-Soo;Oh, Chang-Wug;Jung, Jae-Wook;Kim, Joon-Woo;Park, Kyeong-Hyeon;Kim, Seong-Min
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • v.33 no.2
    • /
    • pp.104-111
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: Although exchange nailing is a standard method of treating femoral shaft nonunion, various rates of healing, ranging from 72% to 100%, have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of exchange nailing in femoral shaft nonunion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 cases of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The mean postsurgical period of nonunion was 66.8 weeks. A nail at least 2 mm larger in diameter was selected to replace the previous nail after reaming. Distal fixation was performed using at least two interlocking screws. The success of the procedure was determined by the finding of union on simple radiographs. Possible reasons for failure were analyzed, including the location of nonunion, the type of nonunion, and the number of screws used for distal fixation. Results: Of the 30 cases, 27 achieved primary healing with the technique of exchange nailing. The average time to achieve union was 23.1 weeks (range, 13.7-36.9 weeks). The three failures involved nonunion at the isthmic level (three of 15 cases), not at the infraisthmic level (zero of 15 cases). Of eight cases of oligotrophic nonunion, two (25%) failed to heal, and of 22 cases of hypertrophic nonunion, one (4.5%) failed to heal. Of 11 cases involving two screws at the distal fixation, two (18.2%) failed to heal, and of 19 cases involving three or more screws, one (5.3%) failed to heal. None of these findings was statistically significant. Conclusions: Exchange nailing may enable successful healing in cases of aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft. Although nonunion at the isthmic level, oligotrophic nonunion, and weaker distal fixation seemed to be associated with a higher chance of failure, further study is needed to confirm those findings.

Comparison of Primary Stability of Different Femoral Fixation Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (전 십자 인대 재건술에서 대퇴골측 고정 방법의 초기 안정성의 비교)

  • Song, Eun-Kyoo;Lee, Keun-Bae;Lee, Moon
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.2 no.1
    • /
    • pp.85-92
    • /
    • 1998
  • Various methods for fixation of graft have been widely used for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. However, the biomechanical strength of each fixation techniques are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to compare the pull out strength of different fixation techniques which is probably the most important factor for the success at the initial stage of healing. Biomechanical test was carried out to measure and compare the pull out tensile strength of five different fixation techniques in 35 pig(Yorkshire) knees. ANOVA and Duncan multiple comparison test was applied for statistical analysis. In the two fixation techniques with bone patellar tendon bone graft, the mean maximum tensile strength was $1333.4{\pm}148.5N$ with titanium interference screw, while it was $1310.1{\pm}168.9N$ with biodegradable interference screw. The failure mode were pulled out of bone plugs from the femoral tunnel in majority cases. In the fixations with hamstring tendon, the mean maximum tensile strength were $1405.9{\pm}135.1N$ with SemiFix screw, $820.3{\pm}104.5N$ with biodegradable interference screw, and $682.1{\pm}54.2N$ with Endobutton. The mode of failure was variable in each technique. The tendon was pulled out from the tunnel in biodegradable interference screw fixation, the screw was bent in the SemiFix system, and the polyester tape were ruptured or the buttons were pulled into tunnel in Endobutton fixation. The mean maximum tensile strength of two interference screws with bone patellar tendon bone was statistically comparable to that of SemiFix with hamstring tendon. However biodegradable interference screw and Endobutton with hamstring tendon showed weaker maximum tensile strength than above three fixation techniques (P<0.05).

  • PDF

Ankle Salvage Procedure without Internal Fixation for Large Bone Defect after Failed Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Report (실패한 족관절 인공관절 치환술 후 큰 골결손에서 내고정 없이 시행한 족관절 구제술: 증례 보고)

  • Park, Man-Jun;Eun, Il-Soo;Jung, Chul-Young;Ko, Young-Chul;Yoo, Chong-Il;Kim, Min-Woo;Hwang, Keum-Min
    • Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.2
    • /
    • pp.76-79
    • /
    • 2014
  • In treatment of failure in ankle joint replacement therapy, talar avascular necrosis with massive bone defect, talus fracture with severe comminution and bone defect and ankle dislocation, treatment of large bone defects is considerably important for ankle joint stability and union, therefore, the choice of treatment for large bone defects is use of femoral head or iliac crest bone graft and rigid internal fixation. Because first generation total ankle arthroplasty performed for the first time using a cemented fixation technique requires a large amount of bone resection during re-surgery and there is some possibility of a larger bone defect after removal of implants, in cases where prosthesis for the defect is needed, performance of palliative femoral head or iliac crest bone graft and rigid internal fixation can be difficult. We report on a case of a 48-year-old woman who had experienced ankle pain for 25 years since undergoing total ankle arthroplasty. Because the patient had little ankle motion and rigid soft tissue despite a large bone defect caused by aseptic loosening, a good outcome was obtained only for the femoral cancellous bone graft using allo femoral head without internal fixation.

Failure of Cross-Pin Femoral Fixation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Case Report - (전방십자인대 재건술후 대퇴골 경골핀 고정의 실패 - 증례보고 -)

  • Lee Kee-Byoung;Kwon Duck-Joo;Ji Yong-Nam
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.92-95
    • /
    • 2003
  • A 34-year-old man with ACL total rupture due to slip down injury, had received ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstrings tendon with cross-pin femoral fixation. Postoperative course was as usual. But postoperative 3 months later, he complained posterolateral knee pain, recurrent effusion and mild instability. He was managed repeatitive aspiration and nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs but was failed to relieve symptoms & signs. In CT scans, perforation of posteromedial femoral cortex of lateral femoral condyle was found. In second look arthroscopy, two pieces of broken femoral cross pin were found in between tibiofemoral Joint which was badly injured cartilage. We considered malposition of pins was the main cause of failure. We propose that femoral tunnel must be made more acute angle and femoral cross-pin guide must be positioned more external rotation 10-20 degree than transepicondylar axis made confirm the cross-pin tunnel position in order to avoid posterior cortex perforation and early failure.

  • PDF

Cross-Pin and Interference Screw Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Tendon -Technical Note- (슬괵건을 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술시 횡고정 핀과 간섭나사를 이용한 대퇴터널 고정술 -수술 수기-)

  • In Yong;Bahk Won-Jong;Park Jong-Beom;Hong Seung-Hwan
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.6 no.1
    • /
    • pp.60-63
    • /
    • 2002
  • Purpose : The purpose of this study was to introduce new femoral fixation technique using a cross-pin and a bioabsorbable interference screw in hamstring ACL reconstruction. Method : Semitendinosus and gracilis were harvested for quadrapled graft. After tibial tunnel had been made, femoral tunnel was made 35 mm in depth. Then the graft passed through the tunnels. Cross-pin was fixed through the drill hole which had been made through upper sleeve of the Rigidfix system. While pulling the graft, bioabsorbable interference screw was fixed through the anteromedial portal. Conclusion : We introduced the new femoral fixation technique using a cross-pin and a bioabsorbable interference screw as a good method with high fixation strength and tight graft-bone contact.

  • PDF