• Title/Summary/Keyword: Fisherina

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Fisherina Activation Plan for the Development of Marine Leisure (해양레저 발전을 위한 피셔리나 활성화 방안)

  • Kim, Sung-Gil
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
    • /
    • v.28 no.2
    • /
    • pp.224-234
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study is conducted to propose an activation plan for fisherinas by analyzing in depth the needs for fisherina development. For this purpose, the result is derived through the analysis of literature, in-depth interviews and Delphi methods. As a result, the need for fisherina development is shown as follows: first, the saturation due to the increase of maritime recreational vessels; second, the possibility of economic development; third, the activation of the fishing village economy. Accordingly, the problems of the fisherina are derived, first, the conflicts with fishermen and recreational vessel users, second, the financial difficulties, third, the lack of infrastructure. The activation plans for fisherinas are as follows: first, forming a consultative body centered on stakeholders; second, ensuring financial soundness; third, building infrastructure by linking businesses; and fourth, systematic supplementary plans. These results will play an important role in expanding the underdeveloped domestic fisherina business and will be another step in activating the maritime leisure industry.

South Korea and Japan's fishing Villages law and Sea Port law Analysis and the Development Direction of Fisherina (한국과 일본의 어촌·어항법 분석과 피셔리나 개발방향)

  • Yang, Young-Cheol;Lee, Jae-Hyung
    • Journal of Navigation and Port Research
    • /
    • v.36 no.1
    • /
    • pp.81-87
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study is enabled our country to compare and analyze Korea's and Japan's marina development related fishing villages in the sea ports, sea port law's systematical research, approved permissions, and operation related ordinance enactments. Henceforth, the results of the research regarding the fisherina development model appropriate for domestic circumstances are as follows. First, the fisherina must be developed in a way to create a new source of income in the fishing villages. The initial steps must be taken in improving the fishing industry and revitalizing the marine leisure sports. Second, there must be a development of a system to reduce its development costs. Third, the existing sea port's unused equipments must be developed in a remodeled form.

Marina Development on the Importance of Optimum Demand and Location Selection Study (마리나 개발 적정수요와 입지선정의 중요도에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Jae-Hyung
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
    • /
    • v.18 no.5
    • /
    • pp.406-415
    • /
    • 2012
  • The research aims to provide its results to each municipal corporation after an in-depth analysis of its optimum demand and also the significance of post-development location selection. The research results, related to the future development of Marina from the municipal corporation, are as follows: There are approximately 49 proper domestic demands after the Marina development. In further detail, there must be a development of the coastal zone Marina concept after classifying the regions to their Metropolitan areas and networking the Marina to each section. Moreover, the classification of the Marinas to small, medium, and large size is of absolute necessity. Regionally, 10 large Marinas must be developed for metropolitan area (2), Chungcheong area (1), Jeolla area (2), Gyeongsang Provinces (3), Gangwon area (1), and Jeju (1). The 17 mid-sized leisure sports Marinas must be developed for metropolitan area (3), Chungcheong area (2), Jeolla area (2), Gyeongsang Provinces (6), Gangwon area (2), and Jeju (2). The rest of 22 small Marinas must be developed for metropolitan area (2), Chungcheong area (1), Jeolla area (6), Gyeongsang Provinces (9), Gangwon area (2), and Jeju (2). In addition, there is an evident result of significant importance in the domestic positions of appropriate Marina development. A group of professionals suggested five key factors contributed to the importance including accessibility, marketability, usability, validity, and natural environment. The results, aimed to show comprehensive importance based on the five factors, ranks in the following order from highest to lowest: usability, accessibility, natural environment, marketability, and validity.