• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.177-188
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 2006년도부터 2008년도 까지 2,608개의 기업-년도 표본을 이용하여 경영자 소유구조와 부채선택간의 관계를 조사하였다. 경영자 지분율은 주식보유분과 미행사된 주식매수선택권을 이용하여 측정하였으며, 부채는 공적부채와 사적부채로 구분하여 경영자 지분율과 차별적인 부채선택간의 관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과 경영자 지분율과 사적 부채의 차입은 유의한 양의 관계가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 신규 차입 부채와 경영자 지분율간의 관계를 분석한 결과 기업이 추가적인 부채를 조달할 때, 경영자 지분율이 증가할수록 사적 부채에 대한 의존도가 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 사적 부채를 금융기관부채와 비금융기관부채로 구분하여 경영자가 특정 형태의 부채를 선호하는지를 분석하였다. 분석결과 경영자 지분율이 증가할수록 금융기관부채를 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 경영자의 소유구조와 부채선택간의 관계를 실증분석 함으로써 본 논문은 다음과 같은 공헌점을 가지고 있다. 첫째, 기존연구에서 다뤄지지 않은 경영자 소유구조와 부채선택간의 관계를 파악하였다. 특히 경영자 소유구조를 측정함에 있어 주식 지분율 뿐만 아니라 스톡옵션도 고려하였다. 둘째, 경영자 지분율의 증가에 따라 사적 부채 차입이 증가하며, 특히 금융기관 부채가 선호되는 실증적 증거를 제시하였다. 마지막으로 경영자의 소유구조와 부채 구조(debt mix) 뿐만 아니라 신규 자금 조달원천에 대한 폭넓은 분석을 수행함으로써 경영자 소유구조와 부채선택 관련 연구에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study is to investigate the effect of managerial ownership level in distribution and service companies on the stock price crash. The managerial ownership level affects the firm's information disclosure policy. If managers conceal or withholds business-related unfavorable factors over a long period, the firm's stock price is likely to plummet. In a similar vein, management's equity affects information opacity, and information asymmetry affects stock price collapse. Research design, data, and methodology: A regression analysis is conducted using the data on companies listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) between 2012-2017 to examine the effect of the managerial ownership level on stock price crash risks. Results: Logistic and regression results indicate that the stock price crash risk was reduced as managerial ownership levels are increased. The managerial ownership level has a significant negative coefficient on stock price crash risk, negative conditional return skewness of firm-specific weekly return distribution, and asymmetric volatility between positive and negative price-to-earnings ratios. Conclusions: As the ownership and management align, the likeliness of withholding business-related information is reduced. This study's results imply that the stock price crash risk reduces as the managerial ownership level increases because shareholder and manager interests coincide, thereby reducing information asymmetry.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.5-16
• /
• 2016

Purpose - This study was to empirically validate the mediating roles of psychological ownership and learning goal orientation in the relationships of managerial coaching behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors/creative behaviors of employees. Research design, data, and methodology - A total of 270 employees in the Korean distribution industry were surveyed on-line, and the results were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equational modeling. Results - The study confirmed prior research results that managerial coaching behaviors were related positively to employees' psychological ownership and learning goal orientation, both of which were associated positively with their organizational citizenship behaviors and creative behaviors respectively. It revealed the complete mediating effect of psychological ownership between managerial coaching and organizational citizenship behaviors and that of learning goal orientation between managerial coaching and creative behaviors. Conclusions - Psychological ownership was found to play an important role in the relationship between managerial coaching behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors. It gives some practical implication regarding the higher turn-over intention rate of the distribution industry, in that promoting psychological ownership through managerial coaching behaviors could reduce the turn-over intention rate.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권7호
• /
• pp.199-208
• /
• 2020

This study investigates the direct and indirect effects, mediated by audit committee quality, of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and profitability on intellectual capital (IC) disclosure. The object observed of this study is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2014-2018 period that are classified as high intellectual capital-intensive industries. Based on the sampling method, purposive sampling, 51 companies were selected as samples. This study used path analysis techniques with IBM SPSS version 25 to study the direct and indirect influences of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and profitability toward IC disclosure. The results of this study show that managerial ownership, profitability and audit committee quality have a significant positive effect on IC disclosure whereas institutional ownership has significant negative effect on IC disclosure. This study also provides empirical evidence, supported by the sobel test, that the audit committee quality is able to mediate the effect of institutional ownership and profitability on IC disclosure. However, the audit committee quality is not able to mediate the effect of managerial ownership on IC disclosure. These findings develop and strengthen the results of prior studies related to the implementation of signaling theory and agency theory in devoting more understanding about IC disclosure.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권7호
• /
• pp.323-331
• /
• 2021

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and level cash holdings in an emerging country, namely, Saudi Arabia, by constructing a corporate governance mechanism (foreign ownership, family ownership, institutional and managerial ownership). This paper uses data from 100 listed firms at Saudi Stock Exchange (TADAWUL) from 2011 to 2019. The firm's decision to hold cash has come to the fore in the last two or three years as a result of the recent global financial crisis, and the impact that this has had on the firms' ability to raise funds from external sources. Using the random-effect generalized least square (GLS) regression model, the findings reveal that foreign and family ownership negatively influences cash holdings, while managerial ownership has a positive association with cash holdings. Further, institutional ownership did not have a direct effect on cash holdings in Saudi Arabia. Our results suggest that ownership structure include foreign ownership, family and managerial ownership is an essential vehicle to promote the performance of cash holding of all the 100 public-listed non-financial firms in Saudi Arabia. We recommend that sound policies should be targeted toward foreign ownership, family, and managerial ownership since they are essential to improve cash holding in Saudi Arabian firms.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.107-115
• /
• 2020

This study is concerned with the relationship between firm's ownership structure and the co-movement of the stock return with the market return. Four different types of firm ownership, including managerial ownership, state ownership, foreign ownership, and concentrated ownership, are among the main features of the company's governance mechanism and have been separately documemented in the previous research to understand their impact on stock price synchronicity. We constructed the regression model, using stock price synchronicity as the dependent variable and the above four components of ownership structure as explanantory variables. The pooled OLS, the fixed effects model, and the random effects are employed to investigate the outcome of the study. Data used in the reserch are of public firms listed on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange (HOSE) during the five-year period term from 2015 to 2019. The data sample contains 235 companies from 10 industries with 1135 observations. The results revealed by the fixed effects model, the large ownership and the managerial ownership are found to have adverse effect on the stock price synchronicity, whereas the foreign ownership model is revealed to have positive influence on the stock return co-movement. The effect of the state ownership on the stock price synchronicity is not confirmed.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.365-376
• /
• 2022

This study aims to look into the causal relationships between corporate social responsibility and firm value, corporate social responsibility and institutional ownership, and firm value and institutional ownership. This study develops a triangle model of causal relationships among the three endogenous variables. Samples for this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2018. The model is operated in the system of simultaneous equation models using the generalized method of moments technique to estimate parameter coefficients. After controlling the effects of trade-off/balancing capital structure and managerial ownership, the research findings show a positive causal relationship between CSR and firm value and firm value and institutional ownership. Institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR, while the effect of CSR on institutional ownership is negative in the firms without managerial ownership and positive in the firms with managerial ownership. This study finds that the causal relationship between CSR and firm value is stronger after the trade-off/balancing of capital structure is included in the model. Capital structure has a convex effect on firm value and positively impacts institutional ownership. In addition, an independent commissioner has a negative impact on CSR but has no direct impact on firm value.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.91-97
• /
• 2021

The disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an important part of the company. CSR disclosure (CSRD) is interesting to study because CSRD in the annual reports is very important in terms of attaining company objectives to satisfy the interests of stakeholders; protect employee's interests; clarify the extent of contribution of the company in both CSR activities and CSRD; assist appropriate investment decisions. This study examines the structure of share ownership and company size as determinants of CSRD in the banking industry. We use a quantitative approach in this approach, in which researchers start with hypotheses and then collect data that can be used to determine whether empirical evidence to support that hypothesis exists. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling so that the research sample was 14 banking companies that are listed on the Indonesian Capital Market Directory from 2015-2017. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression determined the relationship between research variables. The results of the study state that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership, and company size affect CSRD. This demonstrates that the role of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and foreign ownership have an impact on CSRD and are deemed necessary for the corporate environment. Besides, company size determines the activities of CSRD so that it can increase public confidence in the company's operational activities.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.317-328
• /
• 2021

This study aims to determine the factors that affect dividends initiation by initial public offering firms in Malaysia. The ownership structure is examined from a corporate governance theoretical perspective in order to evaluate the impacts of managerial, institutional, and family ownership on the dividend's initiation decision of IPO firms. This study employs a quantitative pooled cross-section of 372 Malaysian IPO companies active during the period of 2002-2013. The number of firms that went public each year varies, thus the pooled cross-section data takes place in this case rather than the panel data. The logistic model was employed to test the proposed hypotheses. The results revealed that the presence of institutional investors in the ownership structure make it more likely for IPO firms to initiate dividends. On the contrary, the presence of a family ownership structure in IPO companies as the controlling shareholder makes these companies less probable to initiate dividends. Managerial ownership was found to have no effect on the decision of initiating dividends by IPO firms. The findings of this study suggest that the existence of institutional and family ownerships are agency cost mitigators, as these ownership types could prompt IPOs firms to initiate dividends to overcome the agency conflicts.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.71-76
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 중국 상장기업을 대상으로 경영자지분율과 부채만기 사이에 음(-)의 상관관계가 존재하는가를 분석한다. 중국은 자본주의의 경험이 짧아 전문경영자의 역할을 분석한 연구는 아직 미진한 상황이다. 이러한 상황에서 본 연구는 미국과 같은 선진국에서와 마찬가지로 경영자지분율이 부채만기에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써 인센티브시스템으로서 경영자에 대한 주식부여의 효과를 검증한다는 데 의의가 있다. 본 연구의 실증분석 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중국 기업의 경우에도 미국기업과 같이 경영자지분율과 장기부채비중 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 음(-)의 상관관계가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 전체 표본을 정부지배기업과 민간지배기업으로 나누어 분석한 결과에서는 정부지배기업은 경영자지분율과 장기부채비중 사이에 유의하지 않은 양(+)의 상관관계가 존재하는 반면에 민간지배기업은 경영자지분율과 장기부채비중 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 음(-)의 상관관계가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다.