• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Focusing on Supreme Court precedents, we intend to establish criteria for judging research misconduct. Research design, data and methodology: In addition, I would like to propose the criteria for judging research misconduct by the KODISA, which applies the court's standards well in practice, and guidelines for preventing research misconduct. Research design, data and methodology: After classifying the case of research misconduct into six cases, the court's judgment and practical application will be reviewed. Results: First, research misconduct that has passed the disciplinary prescription can be punished. This is because the state of illegality continues to this day. Second, even if there were no punishment regulations at the time of research misconduct, it can be retroactively punished with the current punishment regulations. This is because research ethics is a universal and common standard and does not change. Third, if there is a fact that infringes on intellectual property rights, it is presumed unwritten intentions. Therefore, the act of taking and using the work of another person without permission or proper citation procedure, even if it is unintentional and for the public interest, is a research misconduct. Fourth, if there is an inappropriate citation notation, the intention of research misconduct is presumed. It is the judgment of the court that even if a quotation is marked, if it is incomplete, it is recognized as plagiarism. Fifth, if the author uses the work of another person without proper source indication, it is plagiarism even if the other person who owns the copyright agrees to it. The understanding or consent of some parties does not justify research misconduct in violation of public trust. Sixth, it is a research misconduct to create a new work without citations for one's previous work. In addition, even if there is a citation, if the subsequent writing is not original, it is a research misconduct. Conclusions: Academia should clarify the scope of research misconduct by referring to the Research Ethics Regulations of KODISA, and deal with research results that lack the value as creative works similar to those of research misconduct.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.277-287
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 간호대학생들의 학습윤리를 고취하고 나아가 높은 직업윤리의식을 갖춘 간호사가 되도록 교육하기 위해 간호대학생들의 학습윤리에 대한 인식 수준과 실태를 조사하기 위해 수행되었다. 학습윤리인식을 조사하기 위해 학습윤리인식 도구를 이용하여 4학년 간호대학생 355명을 대상으로 설문조사를 시행하였으며, 최종 333부의 자료를 SPSS 22.0을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 학습윤리인식의 평균점수는 1.71점으로 중간정도로 나타났으며 수업에서의 부적절행위가 학습윤리인식이 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났고, 환자존중 또는 기밀보장에 위반하는 행위가 학습윤리인식이 가장 높은 영역으로 나타났다. 또한 학습윤리인식은 대인관계가 좋은 경우가 보통인 경우보다 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 간호학과 입학동기가 성적이나 적성 및 흥미 등의 이유로 입학한 경우가 취업률인 경우보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이에 학생들의 학습윤리인식 고취를 위해 지속적으로 관심을 가질 필요가 있으며, 반복연구를 통하여 학습윤리 교육이 강화되어야 할 부분을 파악할 필요가 있다.

• 한국임상수의학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.174-179
• /
• 2015

정직성과 신뢰는 수의사의 전문직업성(professionalism)을 구성하는 핵심요소일 뿐만 아니라, 수의학교육에서는 수의학 전문교육 결과의 정당성을 보장하는 근거가 되는 중요한 가치이다. 의학교육에서는 의과대학에서의 학습부정 경험이 추후 의사로서 일할 때 발생하는 비윤리적인 행위와 관련이 있다고 밝혀져 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울시내 수의과대학 학생 528명(A대학: 184명, B대학: 344명)의 학습부정과 학습윤리에 대한 태도를 조사하여 분석하였다. 학생들은 학습윤리가 향후 학문윤리에 중요한 영향을 미칠 수 있다고 평가하였다(88.4%). 가장 흔하게 발견되는 학습부정행위는 보고서 작성시 표절(A대학: 71.7%, B대학: 69.5%)과 실습 시 데이터 위조행위(A대학: 40.2%, B대학: 31.7%) 등이었으며, 학생들은 학교 내 학문윤리 문화의 부재가 학습부정행위의 원인이 된다고 지적하였다. 회귀분석 결과 학습윤리에 대한 지식과 동료 학생들의 학습부정행위에 대한 인식이 수의과대학 학생들의 학습부정행위 빈도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 수의과대학 학생들의 학습윤리 교육이 저학년부터 전 과정에 거쳐 보다 유연한 형식의 프로그램으로 진행되어야 하며, 교수진과 학문 커뮤니티의 학문윤리 환경 조성이 중요하다는 점을 도출하였다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.565-580
• /
• 2015

이 연구에서는 R&E 등을 통해 연구 수행과정을 경험하고 있는 영재 고등학교에 재학 중인 과학 영재 267명을 대상으로, 이들이 연구윤리를 잘 준수하고 있는지, 또 연구윤리를 잘 알고 있는지의 여부와 연구윤리를 학습하고 싶은지, 만약 그렇다면 어떤 내용을 배우고 싶은지를 설문을 통하여 알아보았다. 그 결과, 과학영재는 위조, 변조, 표절, 부당한 논문저자표시, 연구부정행위의 묵인 항목에 대하여 45.31%가 경험이 있다고 응답하였으나, 과학자의 연구윤리에 대해서는 90% 내외의 학생이 제시된 항목에 대해 자기표절을 제외하고 모두 문제가 있는 행위라고 응답하였다. 즉 이들은 연구부정행위에 대해 알고 있음에도 불구하고 절반 가까운 학생이 연구윤리를 위반한 경험이 있음을 알 수 있다. 하지만 연구윤리를 배우고 싶다고 응답한 학생은 28.83%뿐이었고, 이들은 좀 더 실질적이고 구체적인 준수방법을 알고 싶다고 응답하였다. 따라서 과학영재들이 책임감 있는 연구수행을 할 수 있도록 하려면, 영재교육연구자들은 이러한 과학영재들의 목소리를 반영하여 연구윤리교육방안을 마련하여야 할 것이다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제6권
• /
• pp.191-215
• /
• 1994

The concept of 'wilful misconduct" was initally used in article 25 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929. The concept was defined in the Hague Protocol, 1955, as having the following two differing concepts: i) "with the intent to cause damage" and ii) "recklessly and with the knowledge that damage would probably result." The concepts contained in the Hague Protocol were used in various international Conventions on carriage by sea, such as Article 2(e) and Article 3(4) of the Protocol adopted at Brussels on Feb. 23, 1968 to amend the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading, signed at Brussels, Aug. 25, 1929(Hague-Visby Rules), Article 13 of the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, Dec. 13. 1974, Article 4 of the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976, Article 8(1) of the U.N. Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 1978(Hamburg Rules) and Article 21 (1) of the U.N. Convention on International Multimodal Transport of Goods, Geneva, 1980. The same concepts were also adopted in Article 746, 789-2(1), 789-3(2) of the Korean Maritime Commercial Law, revised in 1991. As of yet, the legal system of Korean Private Law recognizes only the concepts of "Vorsatz" and "grobe Nachlassigkeit", as is the case with German Private Law. The problem is that the concepts in the Convention do not coincide precisely with the concepts of "Vorsatz" and "grobe Nachlassigkeit". The author has conducted a comparative analysis of the treatment of the concepts of wilful misconduct and its varied interpretations, that is, "with the intent to cause damage" and "recklessly and with the knowledge that damage would probably result" in the Anglo-American law and in the continental European law in the following manner: 1. Background in which the concept of wilful misconduct was introduced in the Warsaw Convention. 2. The concept of "dol" in French private law. 3. The concepts of "Vorsatz" and "grobe Nachlassigkeit" in Korean private law. 4. Analysis of the concept of wilful misconduct in Anglo-American case law. 5. Analysis of the cases interpreting the concepts of "with intent to cause damage" and "recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result" in various jurisdictions. 6. The need to incorporate the concepts of "with the intent to cause damage" and "recklessly and with the knowledge that damage would probably result." 7. Faute inexcusable in French private law. Based upon the comparative analysis, the author points out the difference between the concepts of "wilful misconduct" or "with the intent to cause damage" and "Vorsatz", and between the concepts of "recklessly and with the knowledge that damage would probably result" and "grobe Nachlassigkeit" in the Convention and that of the Korean Private Law system. Additionally, the author emphasizes the importance of the unification in the interpretation of the provisions of the Conventions world wide.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제51권5호
• /
• pp.447-451
• /
• 2008

It is fair to say that there are many ethical issues concerning the publication of medical papers. To define the best practice in the ethics of scientific publishing and a proper understanding of appropriate reporting in medical papers, this review should be useful for authors dealing with ethical issues which involve the protection of human and animal rights, the protection of confidentiality and informed consent, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, author and authorship, copy right transfer, duplicate publication, conflict of interest, and dealing with misconduct cases.

• Applied Microscopy
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2016

Research ethics are mainly of two fields; research integrity and publication ethics. Research misconducts can occur at both areas. Examples of the research integrity violations are falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism; and those of the publication ethics violations are duplicate publication including self-plagiarism, and improper authorship. In this paper, concepts of research misconducts defined in Research Misconduct-related Rules of The Korean Society of Microscopy are explained and discussed.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.10-31
• /
• 2008

Recently, 'Juvenile' is associated with the 'Misconduct', for it becomes an object of public concern. Therefore in this study, we suggest counterplan about the group traits connected juvenile-life intimately. First, parents promote conversation among the family and are concerned about their children. And they find out the problems in the bud to educate beforehand Second, the counterplan by school attaches great importance to individual contact. Third, in the counterplan on social aspects, adults' unwholesome ideas, bad effects of the mass communication, the lack of teenager's association, negative activity, leisure facilities and lack of opportunity for juveniles bring about negative facts for education of teenagers. Therefore we need positive counterplan to enlighten the young and purify the social environment. And the nation establish righteous values for the younger generation to not commit a crime and punish severely as well as must prepare the realistic and clear policy for the young to bear the responsibility for their role.

• Journal of information and communication convergence engineering
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2012

The cyber class has many advantages because it removes the limitations of sharing the same time and space of a class in a classroom. However, most instructors still hesitate to use it because it is more vulnerable to academic misconduct than a faceto- face class. To overcome this problem, we identified suspected cheaters out of a group of test-takers through several objective data, and verified whether or not the suspects were actually cheaters. By investigating the status of academic cheating, we also implement our assessment system with Skinner’s reinforcement theory in order to eliminate or reduce cyber misconducts.

• 과학기술정책
• /
• 제16권1호통권157호
• /
• pp.64-71
• /
• 2006

Fabrication, falsification, plagiarism (so-called FFP), and other unethical acts damage the trust of public in science and scientists. Scientific communities, governments and research institutions should take the appropriate countermeasures. With the increasing visibility and importance of problem, funding agencies and policy-makers find that they must have a better understanding of this phenomenon, and take steps to prevent it. Science is often said as a borderless activity. In these days, many scientific misconduct cases have been emerging almost simultaneously and worldwide. Thus, the immediate actions should be taken internationally as well as nationally. From these points of view, we, Japan, proposed a new international joint-study at OECD Global Science Forum in February 2006, and the proposal was approved with supports by many countries including Korea. OECD would seek an international perspective to address this worldwide problem, bringing together the representatives of science communities, publishers, funding agencies, and policy makers, and exchanging their experiences.