• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.6
• /
• pp.143-150
• /
• 2016

This paper's aim is to suggest the Expert System for analyzing relative combat power in ground operations. Since relative combat power analysis in terms of comparing combat power of friendly forces with one of the enemy can determine how the commander and staffs operate their unit afterwards, it requires fast and rational decision-making process. However, it has relied on manual method so far though Tactical Information Communications Network(TICN) into which numbers of applications can be loaded has been developed over a decade. 3 methods for analyzing relative combat power were expressed as mathematic rules to be used knowledge in the expert system after reviewing previous studies, and it studied how intangible power as well as tangible were reflected on total combat power. The expert system that will be built using EXSYS Corvid tool is expected to lessen error rate, provide faster decision-making, and reflect both intangible combat power and tangible one by using an appropriate weights in analyzing relative combat power. Next research filed includes how to build expert systems related with military personnel and intelligence areas for fast and rational decision-making processes.

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.61-96
• /
• 2023

Amidst the ongoing instability and military tensions between North and South Korea, it is essential for us to comprehend and assess North Korea's military capabilities, while preparing for potential contingencies through military reinforcement. However, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the military balance on the Korean Peninsula, it is imperative to move beyond simplistic quantitative comparisons of combat capabilities and embrace a broader perspective, which includes qualitative comparisons of military strength, operational capabilities, and a nation's ability to wage war. To address this need, this study employs the method of "Net Assessment" to evaluate the relative combat power of South and North Korean conventional naval forces, with a particular focus on surface combatants. This evaluation involves both quantitative and qualitative comparisons of military assets (personnel and equipment) and intangible factors (naval strategies, geography, etc.). By conducting a holistic assessment, the research aims to identify and analyze strategic asymmetries that may exist between the two navies.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.15 no.6_1
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2015

It depend on relative combat power, patriotism and cohesion of citizen to victory in the battlefield. This stu dy try to analysis why the Germany army fail 'the Battle of the Bulge'. The Germany army plan of maneuve r to attack the France army was surprise attack in the beginning of World War II. The Germany army have initiative to make breakthrough Ardennes Ridge. The operation of the Ardennes Offensive Operation and the Battle of the Bulge is the typical features of blitzkrieg shock. However, the results are extremely different. In the course of the operational planning and decision the course of action, military security is most important fa ctor. We can see the truth in 'the Battle of the Bulge'.