• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.454-465
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 무등산국립공원의 서석대 탐방구간(Seoseokdae Trail Section: STS)의 탐방객수 관리 상태 진단 및 관리방안을 제시하기 위해 시행되었다. 이를 위해 서석대 정상부(Seoseokdae summit area: SSA)에서의 조우수 측정 및 조우수에 대한 평가기준(허용 가능 조우수) 설정이 이루어졌다. 데이터는 2019년 6월 중 편의표본추출에 의해 선정된 263명의 STS 탐방객을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 통해 수집되었다. SSA에서의 평균 조우수는 18.7명으로 조사되었으며 대부분의 응답자(95.4%)가 SSA에서 다른 탐방객을 30명 이하로 본 것으로 나타났다. SSA에서의 15분 간격 평균 동시 최대이용객수는 13.4명(범위 3-31명)으로 나타났다. 시간대별 동시 최대이용객수는 13-14시(21.0명), 11-12시(19.8명), 14-15시(15.5명), 12-13시(15.3명), 10-11시(12.3명), 8-9시(10.8명) 등 순으로 많았다. 두 가지 평가기준 설정방법, 즉 긴 질문 형식(Long-question format: LQF)과 짧은 질문 형식(Short-question format: SQF)을 적용한 결과, LQF에 의한 SSA에서의 허용가능 조우수(Acceptable encounter number: AEN)는 59.2명, SQF에 의한 AEN은 55.1명으로 나타났다. SSA에서의 현재 조우수인 18.7명과 동시 최대이용객수(범위: 3-31명)는 LQF 및 SQF에 의해 각각 산출된 AEN보다 적었다. 응답자의 83.0%가 STS에서 '진정한 자연경험에 가까운 경험'을 선호하였으며, 단지 10.0%의 응답자만이 '유원지/관광지와 같은 경험'을 선호하였다. '자연경험에 가까운 경험'을 선호하는 응답자의 AEN은 27.5명으로 '유원지/관광지와 같은 경험'을 선호하는 응답자의 AEN(46.6명)보다 적었다. 응답자의 78.4%는 SSA에서 전혀 혼잡을 느끼지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 응답자 대부분(92.3%)의 SSA에서의 조우수에 대한 개인 허용기준은 그들이 실제로 현장에서 느끼는 지각 조우수(Perceived encounter numbers: PEN)보다 높았으며 응답자의 조우수에 대한 개인기준과 그들의 PEN의 차이는 혼잡 지각도와 부의 상관관계를 나타냈다.

• 대한간호
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.59-71
• /
• 1990

Although the usefulness and importance of clinical application of nursing diagnosis are well recognized by the academic circle, it is not yet generally practiced. In order to provide data for establishing a policy for clinical nursing diagnosis; a study was made at a seminar, sponsored by the Department of nursing, Severance Hospital, with participation of 190 nurses from 33 hospitals. The objective of the study was to find out; 1) if the nurses agree with the academic community in recognizing the benefits and problems of clinical application of nursing diagnosis; 2) how the nurses evaluate their ability to carry out nursing diagnosis; and 3) if educational programs would help enhance ability of nursing diagnosis among nurses. The summary of findings by the study is as follows; 1. While all nurses responded positively on the question of benefits improving science and quality of nursing, thus elevating credibility and position of nurses, some expressed concern on the practicality of the system in setting up nursing objectiveness, confirming the nursing problems and utilizing patient information. For the 20 questions and the scale of 1~5, the lowest average score was 3.223 and the highest 4.066. 2. The study attempted to find out the opinion of the nurses on the problems that 'would make difficult to adopt the nursing diagnosis in clinics. The result of the study indicates the nurses believe the major problems are the fact that the subject of nursing diagnosis are not well defined and that the form sheets do not match with the ones that are currently being used. However, comparing it with the result of the previous study on the same question (inadequate manpower and insufficienf time allocated for the job were two major problems pointed out then.), it can be said that the opinion of the nurses studied this time was much more positive and it suggests that they believe the system can be adopted without increasing manpower and only by giving additional training and by adjusting the format of nursing record sheets. It suggests that the future for adopting a clinical nursing diagnosis is very bright. 3. As the most urgent problem to be solved for adopting clinical nursing diagnosis, 38. 5% responded that it was "education of nurses, "and 34.2% responded that it was "staffing adequate number of nurses". 4. For the 10 questions asked for self-evaluation of ability to adopt the system, with the scale of 1~5, average score was lower than 3. This indicate that they evaluate their ability to adopt the system is low. 5. The results of study taken before and after the educational programs for clinical nursing diagnosis were compared with overall score in order to determine if such program would cause changes in the response to the effect of clinical application of nursing diagnosis, and it was found that there was statistically significant changes suggesting that the education contributed to positive change in the response. 6. The results of study taken before and after the educational programs for clinical nursing diagnosis were compared with overall score in order to determine how the proble~ ms for adopting nursing system would be effected by such educational programs, and it was found that those problems be not soived with a short course of training. 7. The results of study taken before and after the educational programs for clinical nursing diagnosis were compared with overall score in order to determine if such programs would bring changes in the self-evaluation of nurses on the ability of nursing diagno sis, and it was found that program improve score of self-evaluation their ability of the nursing diagnosis. As seen in the above reports, it was found that the nu'rses are very positive about the clinical nursing diagnosis, that educational program for the clinical nursing diagnosis helps nurses for positively changing their attitude for ,the nursing diagnosis, for their self-confidence on their ability to perform nursing diagnosis. With improved know-how and self"confictence of nurses gained through educational and .training programs, the future of clinical application of nursing diagnosis is very bright.diagnosis is very bright.