• Title/Summary/Keyword: Selection Criterion of Physical Computing

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Development of the Selection Criterion of Physical Computing Teaching Aids for Middle School SW Education (중학교 SW교육을 위한 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구의 선정 기준 개발)

  • An, Deukha;Kim, Yungsik
    • The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
    • /
    • v.22 no.5
    • /
    • pp.39-50
    • /
    • 2019
  • In this study, we developed the selection criterion of physical computing teaching aids for middle school SW education. Literature analysis, Delphi survey, and AHP methods were applied to develop the selection criterion. First, seven characteristics for physical computing teaching aids have been set up by the literature analysis. The contents are suitability for curriculum, safety, durability, economy, general availability, attractiveness, and ease of management. Based on these characteristics, the Delphi method is used in developing 31 criteria in 7 areas for the selection of physical computing teaching aids. Next, the AHP method was applied to identify the relative importance between 7 areas and between 31 detailed criteria. And then the final criterion for the selection of physical computing teaching aids was developed by calculating scores for detailed criteria.

Development of the Evaluation Criteria of the Physical Computing Based Learning Tools for SW Education in the 2015 Revised National Curriculum for Elementary Education (2015 개정 초등 교육과정의 SW교육을 위한 피지컬 컴퓨팅 기반 교구 평가 준거 개발)

  • Jeon, HyeongKi;Kim, Yungsik
    • The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.37-48
    • /
    • 2018
  • The 2015 revised national curriculum includes SW courses to improve computational thinking, and a variety of physical computing tools for learning are on sale for use in education. The purpose of this study is to provide a basis for selecting physical computing tool for learning suitable for learning situations and learning purposes, and to provide a reasonable basis for judging the choice of tools in the field. Delphi survey method was used as a reference method for developing evaluation criteria through 25 expert panels. As a result, the criterion of evaluation of the learning tool composed of 40 essential and 11 selection criteria for 7 domains was presented. In addition, the evaluation results of five kinds of learning tools commercialized through the evaluation criteria of the learning tool were analyzed. The evaluation criteria for the learning tools developed through this study are expected to help teachers select rational learning tools and help learning tool developers develop learning tools.