• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회(1)
• /
• pp.806-806
• /
• 2005

• 한국지리정보학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.36-51
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 기후변화에 따른 도시홍수 리스크 평가를 위해 베이지안 확률통계 모형과 GIS를 연계 활용하였다. 리스크는 재난발생가능성과 영향 크기의 곱으로 평가될 수 있다. 본 연구는 베이지안 모델을 기반으로 침수발생가능성을 추정하였고, 기후변화 시나리오 정보를 반영하여 미래 침수발생가능성도 평가하였다. 침수로 발생할 수 있는 영향은 인명피해와 재산피해의 측면에서 살펴보았다. 서울시 서초구를 대상으로 분석한 결과, 현재 침수발생가능성은 하천에 인접하고, 주변지역보다 고도가 낮으며 불투수면 밀집지역인 서초동, 반포동 일대가 높게 나타났다. 미래 침수발생가능성 추정결과, 2050년의 위험지역 면적이 2030년보다 1.3배 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 추정된 발생가능성을 활용한 리스크 평가 결과, 인명피해 리스크는 일반 및 고층 주거지역을 중심으로 높은 리스크를 보인 반면, 재산피해는 상업지역을 중심으로 리스크가 높게 나타났다. 2050년의 재산피해 리스크는 2030년의 재산피해 리스크보다 약 6.6% 증가하는 것으로 평가되었다. 본 연구에서 제안된 도시홍수 리스크 평가 기법은 상세한 공간결과 값의 제공으로 지역맞춤형 재해저감 전략을 위한 중요한 의사결정 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국인공지능학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2022

In this paper, a study was conducted to predict natural disasters in Afghanistan based on machine learning. Natural disasters need to be prepared not only in Korea but also in other vulnerable countries. Every year in Afghanistan, natural disasters(snow, earthquake, drought, flood) cause property and casualties. We decided to conduct research on this phenomenon because we thought that the damage would be small if we were to prepare for it. The Azure Machine Learning Studio used in the study has the advantage of being more visible and easier to use than other Machine Learning tools. Decision Forest is a model for classifying into decision tree types. Decision forest enables intuitive analysis as a model that is easy to analyze results and presents key variables and separation criteria. Also, since it is a nonparametric model, it is free to assume (normality, independence, equal dispersion) required by the statistical model. Finally, linear/non-linear relationships can be searched considering interactions between variables. Therefore, the study used decision forest. The study found that overall accuracy was 89 percent and average accuracy was 97 percent. Although the results of the experiment showed a little high accuracy, items with low natural disaster frequency were less accurate due to lack of learning. By learning and complementing more data, overall accuracy can be improved, and damage can be reduced by predicting natural disasters.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제37권3_4호
• /
• pp.34-47
• /
• 1995

It is experienced fact as a regular annual event that the structure to he designed on unreasonable flood for the agricultural structures including reservoirs have been brought not only loss of lives, but also enormous property damage. For the solution of this problem at issue, this study was conducted to develop an optimal runoff hydrograph model by comparison of the peak flows and time to peak between observed and simulated flows derived by linear time-invariant and linear time-variant models under the condition of having a short duration of heavy rainfall with uniform rainfall intensity at nine small watersheds which are within the range of 55.9 to 140.7 square kilometers in area in Han, Geum, Nagdong and Yeongsan Rivers. The results obtained through this study can be summarized as follows. 1. Storage constants and Gamma function arguments were calculated within the range of 1.2 to 6.42 and of 1.28 to 8.05 respectively by the moment method as the parameters for the analysis of runoff hydrograph based on linear time-invariant model. 2. Parameters for both linear time-invariant and linear time-variant models were calibrated with nine gaged watershed data, using a trial and error method. The resulting parameters including Gamma function argument, N and storage constant, K for linear time-invariant model were related statistically to watershed characteristic variables such as area, slope, length of main stream and the centroid length of the basin. 3. Average relative errors of the simulated peak discharge of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using linear time-variant and linear time-invariant models were shown to be 0.75 and 5.42 percent respectively to the peak of observed runoff hydrographs. Correlation coefficients for the statistical analysis in the same condition were shown to be 0.999 and 0.978 with a high significance respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the accuracy of a linear time-variant model is approaching more closely to the observed runoff hydrograph than that of a linear time-invariant model in the applied watersheds. 4. Average relative errors of the time to peak of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using linear time-variant and linear time-invariant models were shown to be 16.44 and 19.89 percent respectively to the time to peak of observed runoff hydrographs. Correlation coefficients in the same condition were also shown to be 0.999 and 0.886 with a high significance respectively. 5. It can be seen that the shape of simulated hydrograph based on a linear time- variant model is getting closer to the observed runoff hydrograph than that of a linear time-invariant model in the applied watersheds. 6. Two different models were verified with different rainfall-runoff events from data for the calibration by relative error and correlation analysis. Consequently, it can be generally concluded that verification results for the peak discharge and time to peak of simulated runoff hydrographs were in good agreement with those of calibrated runoff hydrographs.