• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.221-233
• /
• 2021

이 연구는 교육정책의 반복적인 정책실패에도 불구하고 이와 같은 현상을 규명하려는 학술적 노력이 부족했다는 문제의식에서 정책학습이라는 관점에서 교육정책의 변화 내용을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 정책이 수립된 지 20여 년이 넘었지만, 여전히 정부와 교원단체 간에 갈등이 심각한 교원성과급 정책을 정책 분석사례로 삼아 분석하였다. 분석결과, 첫째 교원성과급 정책은 김대중 정부에서 문재인 정부에 이르기까지 총 11차에 걸친 정책 내용의 변화가 있었다. 정부가 새롭게 출범할 때마다 교원성과급 정책은 내용에 변화가 생겼을 뿐만 아니라, 동일 정부 시기 동안에도 정책변화는 지속되었다. 둘째, 각 정부별 정책 내용의 변화 단계에서 어떠한 정책학습이 있었는지를 분석하였을 때, 대부분 '정치적 정책학습'과 '도구적 정책학습'이 이루어졌다. 즉, 정책의 목표나 가치에 대한 근본적인 논의보다는 교원성과급 정책의 옹호를 위해 차등지급의 비율을 조정하는 정책학습을 이어왔다. 이와 같은 현 상황을 회복하기 위해 이 연구는 교원성과급 정책의 기본적인 가치와 전략을 검토하는 '사회적 정책학습'을 통해 경직된 교직 사회를 변화시킬 수 있는 대안적인 정책 제시가 필요함을 제안한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.59-68
• /
• 2015

This study was implemented for the purpose of analyzing the effects of Engineering Education Accreditation. Now, 15 years has passed adopting the engineering education system. We need to analyze the effect that this system has changed on the ground of engineering education, and it cultivated the human resource. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, the survey were done on the professors, graduates, and workers. The results and conclusions of this study are summarized as follows: First, it is urgent need to change the system of accreditation, and to get the public trust on assessment. Second, it is necessary to make circumstance that engineering education accreditation is advertised to the industries, and the industry can join the development, consulting, evaluation of curriculum. Third, government needs to make the policy that gives the incentive to the industries, if they give some merits to the accreditation graduates. Fourth, certificate of program graduate is desired to spread the accreditation proliferation. Fifth, government should systemize that accreditation program can get advantage to be selected for the public finance business(e.g. BK, LINC).. It will impact the quality Improvement and accountability of engineering programs.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.137-161
• /
• 2010

The aim of this study was to identify the most effective methods with which to revitalize Korean high school culinary education. To achieve this aim, a culinary recognition questionnaire survey of 616 students from 9 culinary high schools was carried out. The 9 surveyed schools represented the following of 7 regions: Chungnam, Busan, Incheon, Daegue, Jeonbuk, Gyeongbuk, and Gwangju. Collected data were subjected to descriptive analysis, $x^2$-test, t-test, and one-way ANOVA using SPSS(version 14.0). The results of this study are as follows. Culinary practice interest and learning demand of most students were high. 6.8% of students indicated that initial theory learning, followed by video education, and finally live demonstration is an effective teaching methodology. They preferred practicing on actual ingredients as the primary teaching and learning method, nominating technician cooking as the most favorite. As for areas needing improvement in culinary practice education, difficulties with material preparation and insufficient learning hours were identified as prominent factors by 66.8% of respondents. There was unanimous agreement that culinary practice education can be enhanced by highly skilled teachers, while interest for the discipline itself can be fostered by initiating and encouraging cooking participation in the home. Freshmen and special high school students suggested that a cooking related website is necessary to expand the current information interface, which is currently limited to colleagues and employers. In relation to culinary education revitalization, consistent promotion of departments, or high schools that have proven student satisfaction rates and effective culinary curriculum are required. Furthermore, teachers can also aid this process by more effective student pastoral care in order to improve school life satisfaction. However, teacher job satisfaction is an important component of this process, and better employment conditions and remuneration packages reflecting extra work must be considered as part of an attractive teacher-incentive employment policy.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.102-111
• /
• 2016

This study was implemented for the purpose of analyzing the Job Competency level of accredited and non-accredited program's graduates. And we were seeking way to manage realistic and effective way of Accreditation of Engineering education. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, survey and FGI were done. The study was: accredited program's graduates thought more positively than non-accredited program's graduates, and graduates felt that 11 Job Competencies Level of Work Performance were lower than the needs of job performance. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: First, between accredited and non-accredited program's graduates, we could see significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs of job performance. This was because Design curriculum were reinforced and accredited program's graduates had attended design program at accredited program. Second, accredited program's graduates felt higher than non-accredited program's graduates about the perception of level of work performance. This was because the efforts for curriculum reorganizing and teaching methods improvement were done. Third, we could not find significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs for job performance and work level. That was because accredited and non-accredited program were not dealed seperately. The conclusions of this study are summarized as follows: First, The efforts for analyzing job competence of industry and reflecting the program curriculum are needed on the accredited program for engineering education. Second, Government should make the incentive policy about the companies which give some merits to the accreditation graduates, and monitor constantly their real working. Third, in order that the accreditation results can be trustful on staff recruiting or school choosing, accreditation should make outcome-based-evaluation which guarantees competence of graduates.