• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.25-49
• /
• 2014

We wanted to show the different group dynamics of factors for success and failure cases for technology commercialization in small technology-based firms. Existing studies are based on product level, project level, division level or firm level. We deal with technology level, and at small-technology-based firms. This is a longitudinal case study based on 8 cases from Korea. Our study on technology level is a first trial in success and failure studies unlike all existing studies. As a first step, we introduced new categories and factors such as technology attributes and CEO reflecting data, and especially a new concept of launch readiness level. Finally, we adopted correspondence analysis to show the group dynamics. The results are as follows; Technology factors are the most important factors. Second, resource-based factors are more critical in failure cases than success cases and technology factors are more critical to success.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.650-676
• /
• 2005

It is important to identify the mid and long-term strategic technologies and evaluate technology level for the establishment of national R&D policy to upgrade technology level in Korea. This paper summarizes the result of technology level evaluation for 99 key technologies of 'National Technology Road Map', which consists of 5 visions, of Korea. The technology level, the technological gap between Korea and world-top country, the role of government to upgrade technology level, etc. were investigated by the survey (total 1,067 respondents) and the interview with experts related to key technologies. The average technology level of Korea was $65.1\%$ of that of world-top country and average technological gap was 5.8 years. The technology level of vision I 'Building an Information-Knowledge-Intelligence Society' was $71.6\%$ and highest among 5 visions. The highest technology level among 99 key technologies was $85.6\%$ for 'Digital Broadcasting Technology' and the lowest was $20\%$ for 'weather Control Technology'. The major reasons of technological gap were investigated as the lack of R&D personnel ($23.8\%$), the shortage of R&D funds ($17.8\%$), and the insufficiency of basic research ($15.4\%$), in sequence. The average technology level of USA was evaluated to highest in the world. It was presented that the technological power of China increased rapidly in the expert interview. The result of technology level evaluation would be primary information for various national S&T planning, such as S&T basic plan, S&T foresight, technology road map, etc.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.61-75
• /
• 1999

This study is focused on acquiring through understanding of the S&T level of Korea to serve as an important basis for the government policy-making and to make available basic information for promoting the National R&D Program effectively. the survey of S&T level is a comparison of the highest level in the world to that of korea in 3 digit of the technology tree table. And survey of technological gaps is determined by year which Korea is able to reach the current level of the advanced countries. The results of the surveys should be applied to strategic technology planning for solving or nar-rowing the technology gap and the major criteria for resources allocation in national R&D Pro-grams. The results of he surveys should be the fundamental information for establishing strategic S&T policy in government.

• Journal of Computing Science and Engineering
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.20-28
• /
• 2015

General purpose computing applications have not yet been thoroughly explored in procedure level speculation, especially in the light-weighted profiling way. This paper proposes a light-weighted profiling mechanism to analyze speculative parallelism characterization in several classic general purpose computing applications from SPEC CPU2000 benchmark. By comparing the key performance factors in loop and procedure-level speculation, it includes new findings on the behaviors of loop and procedure-level parallelism under these applications. The experimental results are as follows. The best gzip application can only achieve a 2.4X speedup in loop level speculation, while the best mcf application can achieve almost 3.5X speedup in procedure level. It proves that our light-weighted profiling method is also effective. It is found that between the loop-level and procedure-level TLS, the latter is better on several cases, which is against the conventional perception. It is especially shown in the applications where their 'hot' procedure body is concluded as 'hot' loops.

• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.253-273
• /
• 2001

본 총론에서는 원격탐사를 사용한 지구관측분야(Level I)의 기술들에 대한 계층적 분류를 수행하였다. Level II 기술들을 추출하기 위하여, 방법론 관점과 응용 관점에서 구성한 2차원 표를 사용하였고, 이 결과 수신관제와 대기/해양/육지분야의 자료 응용, 그리고 공통기술과 GIS(Geographical Information System) 기술들을 선정하였다. 각 Level II 기술들에 대하여 수개의 Level III 기술들과 약 20-30개 가량의 Level IV 기술들을 추출하였다. 각 Level IV 기술들에 대하여 국내 확보현황, 미확보 기술의 확보 방안, 미확보 기술의 해외 확보 기관, 국내에서의 기술필요시기 등을 정리하였다. 또한 Level IV 기술들 중 공공성과 경제성에 근거한 우선 확보 기술들을 추출하였다. 기술분류 결과와 국내 연구동향에 관한 자료는 국내 연구진들간의 상호 이해와 협력을 촉진하며, 원격탐사분야를 새로이 시작하는 연구진과 학생들에게 기초자료를 제공하고, 정책수립을 위한 참고자료로서 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제20권42호
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 1997

How to measure technological level has concerned research analysists for a long time. Many methods exist, and they all have their advantages and disadvantages according to how they are used. The purpose of this study is to develop qualitative indicator to measure industrial technological level, in particular manufacturing capacity. In this indicator, the two basis of technology classification and the concept of the technology competitiveness were introduced. First, the types of technology are classified as three classes : material technology, processing technology and product technology. Second, the characteristics of technology are divided into the three categories : core technology, peripheral technology and sprouting technology On this basis, the qualitative technological level was made in terms of the competitiveness of it's manufacturing capacity. This study should be a practical approach for application of measuring of technological level.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제47권6호
• /
• pp.247-267
• /
• 2022

Since the Korea-Vietnam FTA was signed in 2015, trade between the two countries has increased rapidly, accounting for 6.8% of Vietnam's exports and 17.9% of its imports in 2020. The two countries show differences in import and export items. Vietnam has a high export ratio of agri-food products or products with the low-middle level of technology, while Korea has a high export ratio of products with the upper-middle level. The purpose of this study is to present implications by analyzing changes in trade competitiveness between Vietnam and Korea by technology level (2002-2020). For this purpose, statistics from UN Comtrade were used, and methodologies such as market share, Export Market Share (EMS), Trade Specialization Index (TSI), Intra-Industrial Trade Index (IIT), Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), and BCG Matrix were used. The results of the study are as follows. First, when looking at Vietnam's trade structure with South Korea by technology level, it was analyzed that the trade deficit widened as it showed a competitive disadvantage in high-tech, ICT, middle- and low-level technology items, excluding low-end technology items. Second, in terms of market share, the market share of Vietnamese products in the Korean market is continuously increasing, while the Korean market share in Vietnam is gradually decreasing from 2017. Third, Vietnam's export competitiveness to Korea by technology level shows that low-level technologies are competitive, but they are inferior in competitiveness in all other technology level, and especially in areas with high technology level, the level of inferiority is high. In conclusion, the trade relationship between Vietnam and Korea has maintained a mutually complementary rather than competitive relationship, which is expected to continue in the future.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.143-164
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 구가차원의 국가기술로드맵 활용도와 개선사항에 영항을 미치는 요인들에 대해 실증 분석함으로써 향후 국가기술로드맵의 활용도 제고와 발전방향을 제시하고자 한다. 국가수준 기술로드맵의 작성과 활용이 증가함에도 불구하고 실제 과학기술 전문가들의 활용도 현황이나 개선사항에 대한 체계적인 조사분석은 상대적으로 미흡하였다. 본 연구는 국내 320명의 과학기술 분야 전문가를 대상으로 수행한 설문조사를 바탕으로 국가수준 기술로드맵의 활용도와 개선방향에 대해 분석하였다. 분석결과, 국가기술로드맵 활용도에는 전반적인 기술수준이 높고 기술로드맵 참여 경험은 활용도에 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 중장기 기술전략의 세부목적에 따라 활용도에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 국가차원의 기술로드맵은 크게 기획과정, 작성과정, 결과활용에서 개선이 요구되며, 기술수준 참여경험 및 중장기 기술전략의 세부목적에 따라 서로 다른 측면에서의 향후 개선사항을 요구하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 의의와 향후 국가차원의 국가기술로드맵의 활용도 제고와 발전방향을 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

• 제어로봇시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.112-119
• /
• 2014

A force support system is composed of capital components such as combat equipments, supplies and so on to enable constant fighting power capability. Private technology level evaluation is on the rise as an important spin-on method in force support systems, which requires 92% of total munitions requirements, to obtain superior private technology. The evaluation of the private sector technology level on Korean force support systems has been conducted for the first time as follows: this research chose 38 items to be acquired within 2-3 years and grouped either identical or similar technology among those 38 items. A technology evaluating method was established based on the analysis of domestic and foreign technology level evaluations. Evaluation was performed by a Delphi survey from 180 private and military experts. To obtain an objective index and raise political availability, a technology system map and standard document were developed and applied to all 38 items.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this paper is to discuss possibilities of applying growth curve models, such as Logistic, Log-Logistic, Log-Normal, Gompertz and Weibull, to three specific technology areas of Fishery Science and Technology in the process of measuring their technology level between Korea and countries with the state-of-the art level. Technology areas of hazard control of organism, environment restoration, and fish cluster detect were selected for this study. Expert panel survey was conducted to construct relevant panel data for years of 2013, 2016, and a future time of approaching the theoretical maximum technology level. The size of data was 70, 70 and 40 respectively. First finding is that estimation of shape and location parameters of each model was statistically significant, and lack-of-fit test using estimated parameters was statistically rejected for each model, meaning all models were good enough to apply for measuring technology levels. Second, three models other than Pearl and Gompertz seemed very appropriate to apply despite the fact that previous case studies have used only Gompertz and Pearl. This study suggests that Weibull model would be a very valid candidate for the purpose. Third, fish cluster detect technology level is relatively higher for both Korea and a country with the state-of-the-art among three areas as of 2013. However, all three areas seem to be approaching their limits(highest technology level point) until 2020 for countries with the state-of-the-art. This implies that Korea might have to speed up her research activities in order to catch up them prior to 2020. Final suggestion is that future study may better apply various and more appropriate models respectively considering each technology characteristics and other factors.