• Title/Summary/Keyword: UBIFS

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

I/O Performance Analysis about Memory Allocation of the UBIFS (UBIFS 메모리 할당에 관한 I/O 성능 분석)

  • Lee, Jaekang;Oh, Sejin;Chung, Kyungho;Yun, Taejin;Ahn, Kwangseon
    • Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.9-18
    • /
    • 2013
  • Flash memory is mostly used on smart devices and embedded systems because of its nonvolatile memory, low power, quick I/O, resistant shock, and other benefits. Generally the typical file systems base on the NAND flash memory are YAFFS2, JFFS2, UBIFS, and etc. In this paper, we had variously made an experiment regarding I/O performance using our schemes and the UBIFS of the latest Linux Kernel. The proposed I/O performance analyses were classified as a sequential access and a random access. Our experiment consists of 6 cases using kmalloc(), vmalloc(), and kmem_cache(). As a result of our experiment analyses, the sequential reading and the sequential rewriting increased by 12%, 11% when the Case 2 has applied vmalloc() and kmalloc() to the UBI subsystem and the UBIFS. Also, the performance improved more by 7.82%, 6.90% than the Case 1 at the random read and the random write.

Performance Analysis of Flash File System for the Efficient I/O on Smart Device (스마트 기기의 효율적인 I/O를 위한 플래시 파일 시스템 성능 분석)

  • Chung, Kyung-Ho;Kim, Yong-Hwan;Kim, Sang-Jin;Jung, Young-Seok;Kim, Sung-Soo
    • IEMEK Journal of Embedded Systems and Applications
    • /
    • v.10 no.3
    • /
    • pp.171-178
    • /
    • 2015
  • Recently NAND flash memory has been found to be the primary cause of low performance in the smart device. NAND flash memory is different from each other the execution time of I/O operations that flash file system is required. Therefore, it is necessary to compare and analyze the flash file system I/O performance for the efficient I/O on smart device. In this paper, it was tested and analyzing the I/O performance of the YAFFS2, JFFS2, UBIFS. Experimental results most read I/O performance is good, but the writing I/O performance is not good. For UBIFS, showed a more good I/O performance compared to other flash file system.