• Title/Summary/Keyword: controlled low-strength material%28CLSM%29

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Correlation between Compressive Strength and Unit Weight of Lightweight Foamed Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Using Coal Ash (석탄회를 활용한 경량기포 CLSM의 압축강도와 단위중량의 상관관계)

  • Lee, Jong-Hwi;Lee, Hye-Jin;Chun, Byung-Sik
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.39-47
    • /
    • 2013
  • With the increase in the application of CLSM using coal ash, we performed a basic research on CLSM material, laying focus on the correlation between compressive strength and unit weight of lightweight foamed CLSM. The unconfined compression strength is a criterion for the judgment of the possibility of re-excavation and an important factor determining the economy, efficiency, and excavation character. However, to know the quantitative compression strength value takes a certain amount of time, because the applicability of unconfined compression strength of CLSM is judged by the standard of 28days. Therefore, in this study the relation between compressive strength and unit weight (foam slurry unit weight, apparent unit weight) is analyzed focusing on lightweight foamed CLSM. We also suggested a formula which can easily predict the 28-day compressive strength only using unit weight value without the need to cure the slurry for 28 days.

A Study on the Engineering Characteristics of CLSM (유동성 채움재의 공학적 특성 연구)

  • Jung, Min-Ji;Jeon, Byeong-Won;Kim, Byeong-Jun
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.40 no.2
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study explores the long-term decline in the uniaxial compressive strength of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) by preparing a sample with a 1:1 mixing ratio of CLSM and water. Uniaxial compressive strength tests were conducted after 7 and 28 days of curing. The results revealed that the compressive strength at 28 days was reduced by a factor of 2.85 compared to that at 7 days. Additionally, when expansion was introduced under the same mixing conditions, there was a significant reduction in compressive strength. Point load strength tests based on 7 and 28 days of curing indicated a disparity of 29.27 to 58.76 and 48.19 to 95.13 times, respectively, between the point load strength and the uniaxial compressive strength at 7 days. The differences observed in the findings of this study compared to previous studies may be attributed to variations in the precision of the test method and the sample production process. Therefore, it is essential to establish clear testing methods to accurately evaluate CLSM.