• Title/Summary/Keyword: lab safety

Search Result 498, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Management Architecture With Multi-modal Ensemble AI Models for Worker Safety

  • Dongyeop Lee;Daesik, Lim;Jongseok Park;Soojeong Woo;Youngho Moon;Aesol Jung
    • Safety and Health at Work
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.373-378
    • /
    • 2024
  • Introduction: Following the Republic of Korea electric power industry site-specific safety management system, this paper proposes a novel safety autonomous platform (SAP) architecture that can automatically and precisely manage on-site safety through ensemble artificial intelligence (AI) models. The ensemble AI model was generated from video information and worker's biometric information as learning data and the estimation results of this model are based on standard operating procedures of the workplace and safety rules. Methods: The ensemble AI model is designed and implemented by the Hadoop ecosystem with Kafka/NiFi, Spark/Hive, HUE, and ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana). Results: The functional evaluation shows that the main function of this SAP architecture was operated successfully. Discussion: The proposed model is confirmed to work well with safety mobility gateways to provide some safety applications.

Development of a User Experience Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab (스마트안전 리빙랩 환경에서의 사용자경험 평가를 위한 방법론 개발)

  • Choi, Jae-Rim;Ryu, Do-Hyeon;Kim, Kwang-Jae;Yun, Jung-Min;Kim, Min-Sun
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.49 no.2
    • /
    • pp.127-143
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose: Smart Safety Living Lab is a Living Lab facility, constructed and operated by KITECH in Korea, to support the user experience(UX) evaluation, planning and certification of smart safety products and services. The purpose of this study is to develop a UX evaluation methodology that accommodates the characteristics of the Living Lab and smart safety products and services for a systematic and efficient UX evaluation in the Smart Safety Living Lab. Methods: A generic model of UX evaluation was first derived based on a review of related literature. Then, the generic model is revised to accommodate the characteristics of the Smart Safety Living Lab and smart safety products and services, resulting in the UX Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab (SSLL-UXEM). Results: The developed SSLL-UXEM consists of a structured process for UX evaluation, a guideline for conducting each step of the process, and a set of forms for recording the major evaluation results in each step. Conclusion: SSLL-UXEM can help to enhance the efficiency of the UX evaluation process and the consistency of the UX evaluation results. SSLL-UXEM is also expected to serve as a basis for UX evaluation in various living lab environments in the future.

A Study for Rationalization of Appointment Criteria to Laboratory Safety Managers in Universities and Colleges (대학의 연구실 안전환경관리자 선임기준 합리화 방안)

  • Kang, Mee-Jin
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
    • /
    • v.27 no.2
    • /
    • pp.127-133
    • /
    • 2012
  • This paper shows survey result on safety management status of laboratories in Korea. In Korea, many studies and reports on laboratory safety have been published since the ministry of education, science and technology (MEST) enforced the Act on Establishing a Safe Environment of Laboratories (Lab Safety Act) in 2006. The MEST has surveyed status of safety management in institutions subject to Lab Safety Act in 2008 and 2010. According to the survey result, safety management status of universities and colleges has been improved on several factors such as establishment of safety manual and implementation of safety inspection; while the number of safety managers of universities and colleges have increased. However, the difficulties in performing duties of safety managers has increased because the number of exclusive safety managers has decreased. This paper identifies the similarities and differences between Occupational Safety and Health Act and Lab Safety Act on assignment and duties of safety managers; therefore, this paper suggests a standard to determine the number of safety managers and decide whether or not their duties should be exclusive. Besides current standard that is based on the number of researchers, the number of individual laboratories should be considered. The new method would be helpful to determine the number of exclusive safety managers because the amount of safety managers' duties generally do not depend on only the number of people who may be exposed to any risk but also the number of facilities that may be cause of any accident.

Effect of University Lab Manager Safety Leadership on Student Safety Behavior : The Controlled Mediating Effect of Individual Safety Motivation (대학 연구실책임자 안전리더십이 학생의 안전행동에 미치는 영향 : 개인 안전동기의 조절된 매개효과를 중심으로)

  • Jo, Han Jin;Lee, Hwang Won;Lee, Hyun Ju;Roh, Young Hee
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
    • /
    • v.37 no.2
    • /
    • pp.54-68
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to provide implications for improving the safety behavior of university lab students by grasping the relationship between leaders' safety leadership, the lab's safety climate, and individual safety motivation variables. To this end, a survey was conducted on nationwide university laboratories, and the main results are as follows. First, transformational and transactional safety leadership had a positive effect on safety behavior, while the laissez-faire one had a negative impact.Second, it was found that the laboratory safety climate plays a mediating role in the relationship in which safety leadership affects safety behavior. Third, it was found that individual safety motivation was governed by the laboratory safety climate's effect on safety behavior. Fourth, individual safety motivation was found to control the mediating effect of the laboratory safety climate in the relationship between safety leadership and safety behavior. The conclusion of this study is the following: to strengthen the safety behavior of university laboratory students, the laboratory manager must operate the laboratory with a transformational and transactional safety leadership. Additionally, educational institutions must effectively operate their own safety-day programs to create a safe climate for each laboratory and improve students' safety motives.

Comparison of Regulatory Systems for Safety and Health Management in Research Laboratories - Case Review between Korea and Germany (연구 실험실 안전보건 관리제도 비교 - 한국과 독일 사례 고찰)

  • Park, Jihoon;Sung, Baeckkyoung;Altmeyer, Matthias Oliver;Kim, Young Jun
    • Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.99-108
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objectives: This study aimed to compare the regulatory systems for laboratory safety and health management between Korea and Germany and discuss the implications. Methods: Laboratory safety and health regulations for legal enforcement and relevant technical guidelines in Korea and Germany were reviewed. Results: Lab safety and health management is enforced by the Act on the Establishment of Safe Laboratory Environment in Korea. Most provisions focus on supervisory control, that is, the principal's liability is emphasized. In addition, there is a lack of laboratory-specific procedures for safety and health management in the act since it is stipulated that other relevant regulations apply to some technical contents. Non-compulsory technical guidelines for lab safety and health management are also provided by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) in order to enable researchers to follow safe procedures. There is no independent regulation for lab safety and health in Germany, and it is also governed by several regulations. The German Social Accident Insurance Institute provides technical guidelines on lab safety and health, and these contain more specific content to allow them to be followed more easily compared to the KOSHA guidelines. The most remarkable differences between the regulation of each country were contents of the risk assessment and specific protect measures from hazardous agents. Conclusions: Regulatory control is an essential way to prevent accidents, but it is more important to create an environment in which all stakeholders, including individual lab members, are allowed to participate actively in safety and health management activities.