• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 2003

이 연구에서는 안전관리체제(ISM Code) 실행지원 모듈개발중 하나인 ISM Code 운영평가 모듈 개발을 위한 기초적 연구를 수행하였다. 특히 ISM Code 운영평가 모듈 개발을 중심으로 AHP의 운영평가 분석과정과 설문지 설계, 운영평가 모형 기준의 위계 구조를 정립하였다는 것에 대해 그 의미가 있겠다. 또한 경영과학 분야의 주요 의사결정 하나인 AHP 기법을 운영평가 모듈 개발에 적용을 시도했다는 것에 대해서도 한층 가치가 있겠다.

• 해양환경안전학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 해양환경안전학회 2003년도 추계학술발표회
• /
• pp.93-97
• /
• 2003

이 인구에서는 안전관리체제(ISM code) 실행지원 모듈개발중 하나인 ISM Code 운영펑가 모들 개발을 위한 기초작 연구를 수정하였다. 특히 ISM Code 운영평가 모듈 개발을 중심으로 AHP의 운영평가 분석과정과 설문지 설계, 운영평가모형 기준의 위계 구조를 징립하였다는 것에 대해 그 의미가 있겠다. 또한 경영과학 분야의 주요 의사결정 하나인 AHP 기법을 운영평가 모듈 개발에 적용을 시도했다는 것에 대해서도 한층 가치가 있겠다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권spc1호
• /
• pp.525-554
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to seek out the problems influencing on the operation of Institution Evaluation(IE) in Korea and suggest a better way for the evaluation based on the findings, expecially focusing on Government Research Institute(GRIs) in the field of Science and Technology. Unlike previous studies on IE of GRIs, this research is more oriented toward actual practices than design and theories of IE. Three categories are 1) purely system aspect, 2) system-operation aspect, and 3) environmental aspect. These three categories are classified into eight sub-categories: 1) the legal support and the legally enforceable provision, 2) the target area of evaluation, 3) the means and process of evaluation, 4) the criteria and indices for evaluation, 5) the expertise of evaluators, 6) the use of evaluation findings, 7) GRIs' support for IE, and 8) public support for IE. Summing up the findings of this study, the main factors that hamper the successful operation of the existing IE of GRIs in the field of Science and Technology was illuminated and the better way for the operation of IE was suggested.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.277-284
• /
• 2008

Recently, the long-term operation of a nuclear power plant beyond its licensed term has become a worldwide trend as long as the safety of the plant is maintained in the extended period. Kori Unit 1, the oldest PWR in Korea, is the foremost example of this type of long-term operation in Korea. Comprehensive technical evaluation of the long-term operation of this plant was completed to confirm the overall safety of the plant. The technical evaluation included a review of PSR results, an assessment on aging management programs and time limited aging analyses, and a statement of radiological impact on the environment. Based on all of the results of the technical evaluation activities, Kori Unit 1 was approved to operate for an additional 10 years beyond its original design life of 30 years.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 2005년도 학술발표논문집
• /
• pp.429-435
• /
• 2005

This study attempts to develop indices in order to make an objective and effective evaluation of achievements in the first stage of operation of the Rural Village Development Project(RVDP) (the first 3 years of its operation). The results are as follows 1. Evaluation purposes are expansion of income-generating bases, improvement of living environments, strengthening of village's competence and establishment of an effective project's management system. 2. Evaluation items for the first three evaluation purposes, which are income-generating bases, improvement of living environments and strengthening of village's competence, are record of performance and substantiality in project's operation, results from operation, and capability in managing the project. Those for establishment of an effective project's management system are participation of habitants and the projects's management system. 3. As this study aims to develop the indices which can evaluate the state of operation in the interim of the project's operation and outcomes generated by then, the evaluation indices are selected by considering those criterions of representativeness, accessibility, usefulness and reliability. 4. As the indices developed in this study efficiency evaluate the process of project's operation and thus evaluate basically the project's operation on the basis of its efficiency. But, considering the purposes of the RVDP, it is included for the overall project's management system and plans for managing activities of the project to be evaluated on the basis of effectiveness.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.133-157
• /
• 2022

현재까지 여러 분야의 주제기록관이 설립 및 운영되고 관련 연구들도 꾸준히 진행되어왔으나, 주제기록관의 특성을 반영한 평가지표는 아직 개발되지 않은 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 문헌연구를 통해 주제기록관 운영평가 지표(안)을 개발하고, 델파이 조사를 통해 주제기록관 운영평가 지표를 제안하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 국내 주제기록관 설립과 운영에 대한 연구와 국내·외 기록관리 평가지표 및 국내 유사기관 평가지표를 분석하여 주제기록관 운영평가 지표(안)을 개발하였다. 다음으로, 5개 분야 주제기록관 기록관리 업무 담당자 10명을 대상으로 3차에 걸친 델파이 조사를 실시하여 최종적으로 '주제기록관 운영', '자원관리', '주제기록물 관리', '기록정보서비스'의 4개 평가범주와 10개 평가항목, 28개 세부항목으로 구성된 주제기록관 운영평가 지표를 제안하였다. 본 연구는 국내에서 처음으로 주제기록관의 운영평가 지표를 개발 및 제안하였으며, 본 지표는 주제기록관의 운영에 대한 평가 및 환류를 통해 주제기록관 업무의 전문성과 효율성을 증진시키고, 주제기록관의 기록관리 환경을 개선하며, 운영 및 업무 수행 시 도달하여야 하는 표준적이고 일관적인 기준을 제시한다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.93-105
• /
• 2022

연구목적: 본 연구는 교내에서 실시하는 임상실습의 효율적인 운영을 위한 운영관리 평가기준을 개발하고 타당성과 신뢰성을 검증하였다. 연구방법: 본 연구의 평가기준 초안은 CIPP 프로그램 평가모형을 기반으로 도출하였으며, 내용의 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 5년 이상 임상실습 교육을 담당했던 치위생과 교수 및 임상현장 치과위생사 30명을 대상으로 델파이 조사를 실시하였으며, 실기교육을 담당하는 교수 및 임상현장 치과위생사 252명을 대상으로 본 조사를 실시하였다. 연구결과: 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 7개 요인으로 총 36문항을 확인하였으며 최종 평가 기준의 내적 일관성을 확인한 결과 내적 적합도는 0.914였다. 결론: 이상의 결과에 따라 교내 임상실습의 운영 및 관리를 평가하기 위한 평가기준의 타당성과 신뢰성이 적절함을 확인하였으며, 향후 이에 관련된 후속 연구에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.37-54
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to present an evaluation model to measure the clarification level of stakeholder requirements of public sector software projects in the Republic of Korea. We tried to grasp the quality of proposal request through evaluation model. It also examines the impact of the level of stakeholder requirements on the level of system requirements. To do this, we analyzed existing research models and related standards related to business requirements and stakeholder requirements, and constructed evaluation models for the system operation concept documents in the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148. The system operation concept document is a document prepared by organizing the requirements of stakeholders in the organization and sharing the intention of the organization. The evaluation model proposed in this study focuses on evaluating whether the contents related to the system operation concept are faithfully written in the request for proposal. The evaluation items consisted of three items: 'organization status', 'desired changes', and 'operational constraints'. The sample extracted 217 RFPs in the national procurement system. As a result of the analysis, the evaluation model proved to be valid and the internal consistency was maintained. The level of system operation concept was very low, and it was also found to affect the quality of system requirements. It is more important to clearly write stakeholders' requirements than the functional requirements. we propose a news classification methods for sentiment analysis that is effective for bankruptcy prediction model.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.364-382
• /
• 2009

The purposes of this study were to develop the standard indicators to evaluate the food and nutrition systems in hospitals and to test the validity of those items scientifically. The results were as follows: First, the conceptual validity was examined with recognition degrees of importance from the hospital nutrition department managers. All of the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation standards and the indicators' conceptual validity tested were in the range of 3.71~4.93 out of 5.0, and the mean score was 4.36. Therefore, the conceptual validity was verified. Second, to verify the factor validity of the items of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation, the standards and indicators were analyzed as key-factors. Key-factor analysis after vertical rotation showed that four factors appeared and were composed of (a) facilities management, (b) sanitation management, (c) operation & foodservice management, and (d) nutrition management. Third, the reliability of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was analyzed and resulted in a score of 0.98, which showed good internal consistency. Fourth, the discriminative power of each item of the standards for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was tested by checking the differences between groups with first quartile and forth quartile of total evaluation scores. The indicators having low distinction power were modified into obligatory items or eliminated for better differentiation.

• 한국식품조리과학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.247-255
• /
• 2004

The foodservice industry is changing more and more from on-site foodservice management to contract foodservice management. However there are differences according to the level of management and operation of contract foodservice management company (CFMC). The necessity of certification on CFMC is increasing to enable fair discrimination of CFMC among most clients that want to contract with CFMC. This study was performed to identify the foodservice operation evaluation model's criteria items for certifying CFMC. The analysis research methods included literature review, content analysis, individual interview, Delphi technique, and brain storming. First, the following infrastructure items were prepared in the contractor's viewpoint: procurement, transparency of operation, menu development and operation system, nutrition service system, professional employee education, sanitation andsafety management system, customer satisfaction system, facility system, management information system (MIS), business and economics. Second, the evaluation criteria required by the contractor on the client's view point was similar to school foodservice, hospitalfoodservice, and business andindustry foodservice except extraordinary items of field. Third, evaluation criteria and detail categories and items were identified such as financial focus, customer focus, process focus, human focus, and renewal and development by grafting on intellectual capital evaluation methodology for CFMC.