Reliability for Multiple Reviewers by using Loglinear Models

로그선형모형을 이용한 복수 평가자들간의 신뢰도에 관한 연구

  • Park, Byung-Joo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Im (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Jo (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hyun (Department of Social Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Jang (Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankuk University) ;
  • Bae, Jong-Myon (Department of Preventive Medicine, ChungBuk University) ;
  • Shin, Myung-Hee (Department of Preventive Medicines, SungKyunKwan University) ;
  • Ha, Mi-Na (Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankuk University) ;
  • Han, Sang-Whan (Institute of Occupational Health, Gil Medical Center)
  • 박병주 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이성임 (서울대학교 자연과학대학 통계학과) ;
  • 이영조 (서울대학교 자연과학대학 통계학과) ;
  • 김동현 (한림의대 사회의학교실) ;
  • 권호장 (단국의대 예방의학교실) ;
  • 배종면 (충북의대 예방의학교실) ;
  • 신명희 (성균관의대 예방의학교실) ;
  • 하미나 (단국의대 예방의학교실) ;
  • 한상환 (길의료원)
  • Published : 1997.12.01

Abstract

To guarantee the inter-reviewer reliability is very important in evaluating the quality of large number of clinical research papers by multiple reviewers. We cannot find reports on statistical methods for evaluating reliability for multiple raters in clinical research field. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the statistical methods focused on kappa statistic and five kinds of loglinear models for, which can be applied when evaluating the reliability of multiple raters. We have applied these methods to the result of a project, in which seven reviewers have evaluated the quality of 33 papers with regard to four aspects of paper contents including study hypothesis, study design, study population, study method, data analysis and interpretation. Among the five loglinear models including Symmetry model, Conditional symmetry model, Quasi-symmetry model, Independence model, and Quasi-independence model, Quasi-symmetry model shows the best model of fitting. And the level of reliability among seven reviewers revealed to be acceptable as meaningful.

Keywords