The Surgical Results of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - Open Versus Endoscopic Method -

수근관증후군의 수술방법에 따른 성적 - 내시경수술과 개방절개술 -

Objective : The goal of this study is to present whether endoscopic release(ER) is superior to open release(OR) for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome(CTS). Method and Material : Fifty-nine wrists in 43 patients who had clnical signs and symptoms consistent with CTS, not responded to non-operative management, were entered into the study. Authors retrospectively compared 27 wrists treated with ER(February 1999-June 1999) with 32 wrists treated with OR(October 1997-March 1999). We performed conventional open surgery in 25 patients(mean age ; 46 years) and Brown's two-portal technique in 18 patients(mean age ; 53 years) under intravenous regional block or general anesthesia. Results : Sixteen patients had CTS on both hands and left hands were affected more frequently than right hand, 34 and 25 respectively. Successful and poor results of ER were similar to those of OR. For patients in OR group, mean duration of symptoms was 5 years(range 1 month-30 years), and postoperative outcome was good in 27(84.4%) of wrists and poor in 5(15.6%). For patients in ER group, mean duration of symptoms was 7 months (range 2 months-25 years), outcome was good in 23(85.2%) of wrists and poor in 4(14.8%). The average time for complete relief of pain was 1.3 weeks and 7.6 weeks, respectively for OR and ER groups. No complication was noted in either group. Conclusion : This preliminary analysis suggests that faster relief of pain was achieved when the endoscopic method was used, although there were no significant differences in their efficacies regarding the improvement of symptoms.